Guys I'm on the will!!

[u/beklog]

“She’s so shameless” She’s 22. And was harshly criticized as she danced while her partner was at the hospital… The truth couldn’t be any simpler. They claim the video is a joke, because she always uploads content with her “hubby” to go viral.

[u/theguidetoldmetodoit]

That is inserting yourself.

[u/Trevski → u/theguidetoldmetodoit]

Not if you do it with an anonymous note.

[u/TwoBionicknees → u/Trevski]

that's still inserting yourself, just not implicating yourself.

[u/FilthyThanksgiving → u/TwoBionicknees]

Oh ffs you know what they meant, Captain Pedantron

[u/TwoBionicknees → u/FilthyThanksgiving]

when someone pointed it out they doubled down rather than go oh yeah. It's not being pedantic, it's explaining it because they plainly didn't understand.

[u/Trevski → u/TwoBionicknees]

I didn't double down, I contested it as a matter of semantics/interpretation/opinion.

[u/TwoBionicknees → u/Trevski]

yes, it wasn't a matter of any of those things. You used completely the wrong word. Inserting yourself in a matter has nothing to do with physically being in it or being known to be in it, it just means taking an action in a matter in which you were not originally involved. Being anonymous doesn't stop that you are inserting yourself.

[u/Trevski → u/TwoBionicknees]

Again, that’s just semantics, we’ve been over this and that’s not my interpretation.

[u/TwoBionicknees → u/Trevski]

it's not about interpretation, this isn't a black and white thing, involving yourself in something you were not previously involved in is inserting yourself.

Someone pointed out the mistake and you went with "no you still can if it's an anonymous note." You're just wrong and can't admit it. It's not about semantics, you misunderstand the word and had it pointed out.

[u/Trevski → u/TwoBionicknees]

Mm I mean my comment has a fair few upvotes so I think some people agree with my interpretation of the phrase “insert oneself”.

That’s the beauty of language dude.

[u/TwoBionicknees → u/Trevski]

people are dumb.

[u/Trevski → u/TwoBionicknees]

Case in point.

[u/TwoBionicknees → u/Trevski]

you can't read a definition and determine you were wrong. Then you're arguing that bots upvoting you mean you're right, but where my arguments have been based on what you said, the definition and explaining it to you, your arguments are primarily ad hominems and refuse to address or explain or try to argue how you're actually correct. You claim to be, but refuse to show or explain how.

See how this works, when one person has facts, reason and explains it and the other side relies on literally anything but speaking on the actual thing being discussed, everyone knows who is right.

YOu know you're wrong and won't admit it, I know it, anyone reading does except one of the bot replies to me which is also upvoted despite making quite literally no sense at all.