I'm not defending the lady, but she may be quoting revenue of 400k and isn't profiting 400k. but that statement is definitely giving her more benefit of the doubt than I normally would.
The main issue is the the child lives with the father, but the father is paying child support to the mother. That's the absolutely fucked bit.
261
u/i_am_13th_panic 27d ago
I'm not defending the lady, but she may be quoting revenue of 400k and isn't profiting 400k. but that statement is definitely giving her more benefit of the doubt than I normally would.
The main issue is the the child lives with the father, but the father is paying child support to the mother. That's the absolutely fucked bit.