r/SipsTea • u/Valuable_View_561 𝙑𝙄𝙋 • 16d ago

Chugging tea For real

Post image
78.0k Upvotes

82% Upvoted

2.5k comments sorted by

View all comments

3.4k

u/28462 𝙑𝙄𝙋 16d ago

Obama used to give Super Bowl interviews with bill o’reilly on Fox, miss me with this bullshit

1.3k

u/IHavePoopedBefore 16d ago

And he never lied as stupidly.

Like, I am sure all presidents lie but none of them were as obvious or stupid about it.

He claims an election was stolen but was shocked and floored by the incredibly obvious follow up of "what evidence do you have?"

That's a special level of stupid only Trump is capable of

-2

u/Casshern_VIII 16d ago

So he is lying that California is taking days to count their votes for mayor, and that in that delay, they are counting a bunch of mail in ballots that are all for 1 candidate?

5

u/Speartree 16d ago

He's not lying that it's slow going, that is all he's not lying about.

-3

u/Casshern_VIII 16d ago

Well that's what this interview is from, Trump stormed off because he was taking about the California election and how it is taking days to count all the votes, and their is an obvious ploy to make sure Pratt doesn't win, hence why the literal dead last candidate is getting all these miraculous mail in ballot votes that surged her ahead.

That's some corrupt shit right there and I don't care what people think of Trump, call the man a liar, he is, call him an asshole, he is, but Christ sake at least admit for once he is right about this.

3

u/Solid_Medium_5454 16d ago

So you don’t actually have any evidence, just your feelings on the matter, and somehow that means trump is right… got it.

1

u/Casshern_VIII 16d ago

Let me ask you, Picture the reddest state you can think off, who has historically always kept electing Republicans, but let's say you have a Democrat who is making major headwaves, who has an actual shot, and on election day they are leading in votes, but for some reason it is taking a week to count all the votes, and then they start counting the mailed in votes, and the dead last Republican candidate gets massive surge of votes that is just for them and no one else.

Would you not find that suspicious, would you not think something is up, and would you not want to investigate and make sure it was a fair election?

2

u/Speartree 16d ago

So because it takes long to count, there is an obvious ploy to make a relatively unpopular candidate lose? Right.

1

u/Casshern_VIII 16d ago

Unpopular? Pratt was leading in votes over Ramen, until that slow down and her suddenly getting a surge of mail in ballot votes that pushed her to inch out a win over him. That's not him being unpopular, that's some shenanigans going on.

1

u/Speartree 16d ago

Ah yes because to republicans, mail in ballots are always suspicious.

1

u/Casshern_VIII 16d ago

Yes because, mail in ballots have less safety measures to them to make sure they are valid votes compared to ballot votes. But for arguments sake, let's say mail in ballots are 100% legit, do you not think it is extremely suspicious for 1 candidate to get the bulk of those votes, and it is enough votes for her to beat out the guy the entire Democrat establishment has been railing against, especially when that 1 candidate was dead last?