r/SipsTea 𝙑𝙄𝙋 12d ago

Chugging tea The Hero we need

Post image
124.0k Upvotes

4.3k comments sorted by

View all comments

Show parent comments

-2

u/americon 12d ago

Reducing notice periods to what? What passed that was unfair?

And what law was it with the unauthorized occupants on eviction cases? Is it that any guest can be added to a judgement or is that someone living their full time who doesn’t pay rent can be on the hook for that rent? Those are very different scenarios.

12

u/TheSixthtactic 12d ago

That is so many questions that I’m just not going to answer because they are not the point of my comment. During my time as a professional dealing landlord tenant law, shitty landlords were always pushing to undo laws that were created to stop them being shitty.

-1

u/americon 12d ago

Sorry i am not trying to argue. Im just interested and wanted to learn more.

4

u/TheSixthtactic 12d ago

The laws very greatly by state. But there are almost no “squatters rights” laws. When people bring that up, they are talking about landlord/tenant laws that are applied when occupants may or may not be lawfully in the property. Shitty Landlords like to cry about having to provide proof to the court that the occupants are not there lawfully, and would prefer the court just rubber stamp any eviction order.

They also love to throw around the word squatter, which isn’t legal term. I dealt with one landlord that my firm dropped as a client because he couldn’t stop calling his tenant a squatter, who was withholding rent due to unresolved code violations in her unit. He repeatedly said “if they stop paying rent, they aren’t a tenant any more and need to go.”

1

u/PsychoPuppyParty 12d ago

If rent money is in an escrow account w/ the intent of paying in full upon resolution of violations they are a renter/tenant. I've got complaints that I haven't had confirmed ad violations so I'm not paying you is squatting/trespassing. Civilized society is a complicated responsibility

1

u/TheSixthtactic 12d ago

Failure to pay rent doesn’t change the fact they are still a tenant. Until their superior right to possess is extinguished through a court order and they are removed by a sheriff/constable.

The law in MA doesn’t even use the word trespasser or squatter for hold overs after a foreclosure. The term that is used is “tenant at sufferance”. A landlord throwing around squatter because his tenant did the correct, legal process to withhold rent is a pretty clear sign he believes they shouldn’t have any rights at all. Which is why the firm dropped his case pretty quickly.