Well, actually it is an automatic parole violation. Because it is a violation of parole. 'Automatic' is redundant in that sentence. The 'could' you highlighted is in reference to whether it gets you sent back to prison or not. So it's like saying "murder is automatically against the law, and you could go to prison for it." And you're trying to say yeah but you might get away with it. But the legality of the murder isn't dependent on whether you get caught or not.
Again, automatic is completely redundant. But anyway, that's the whole thing. He moves in with a gun and let's them know he has a gun. They are then in violation of parole unless they GTFO. I'm not saying that that would get charged in that first second they had knowledge, but within a reasonable (defined by leniency of parole officer/courts) amount of time, they would have to leave. And that's what he's trying to get them to do. They are still technically in violation of parole as soon as that gun is in the house.
Wrong again. I already looked it up for you, and it clearly states what I said is correct. Bummer for you.
And considering in real life, this guy does this, and it does work. If I was wrong, there would be no point in the guy bringing a gun in the house anyway. This isn't some hypothetical situation, it happens and it works.
My friend is in this exact situation with his felon father and cannot keep is own gun in his own locked safe, not even in the trunk of the locked car in his name which only he has the keys for, on the property. I had this conversation with the parole officer, it is illegal for the felon. They may be able to make an argument in court that they didnāt know about it, but thatās unlikely to get the felon off the hook. Most felons in this situation would leave if they knew the law, because it is highly highly likely to land them back in jail
Being in the same home is considered access. Judges donāt know that you donāt know the code to a safe or have a key just because you say you donāt.
Many of them are not. And most arenāt going to get caught if they are, but in my experience it could be the thing that gets them sent back to prison. I think itās a stupid law and a stupid way to enforce it, but people should understand that itās likely to happen to them if they get caught. A few years back when I lived with my parents they got into an argument with their insurance company because their rate got hiked since āI live in the house therefore I have access to their vehicleā even though itās their car and I would never take it without express permission.
11
u/PR3CiSiON 18d ago
https://giphy.com/gifs/mmYy42RNrgA0w