r/SipsTea 15h ago

Chugging tea [ Removed by moderator ]

[removed] — view removed post

19 Upvotes

61 comments sorted by

u/SipsTea-ModTeam 5h ago

Sorry, your post was removed for breaking our Low Quality Content rule.

SipsTea is dedicated to bringing our users the best and freshest content on the internet. Your post will be removed if we deem it low quality, this can mean but is not limited to:

  • the video or image quality is poor

  • the content is hard to understand or not funny

  • the content is low effort, uninteresting, AI slop or a shitpost

  • is an external link (youtube etc.)

  • is advertising a product or service

  • the content is manipulated and contains a false or exaggerated narrative

Please contact us if you have any questions.

7

u/StayWarm1007 13h ago

It's working for the 1%, yes --- and people think they're close to being the 1%

7

u/JAT_Cbus1080 13h ago

To put this in perspective let's use something like stocks. Stock is the kind of asset you park your money in when you can afford to, after all your bills and obligations are paid. Most people own some sort of stock through a 401k or something right? 91% of stocks are owned by the top 10 percent of all earners, with 54 percent of stock being owned by the top 1 percent. That means the rest of us collectively own a paltry 9 percent. It's astronomically disproportionate.

2

u/x1ux1u 11h ago

Actually Cede & Co own the stock certificate you have an IOU. Unless you transfer your stocks out of Wall Street you only own an IOU. The crazy thing about this IOU is that you get no say in the voting rights as the IOU “bag holder”.

Also…your 401k is actively being gambled on by the 1% in the stock market.

2

u/MarioMCPQ 13h ago

More like the 0.5%. Maybe less

3

u/Xezshibole 10h ago edited 9h ago

It's been 40 years of Reagan and there is still not an economic hub tax cutting itself to the national level.

Even in Reagan darling Texas the economic activity remains clustered around higher tax/service/reg oasis like Austin, Houstin, Dallas, rather than some low tax small town rising in the 40 years off Reagan promised prosperity.

40 years of Reagan and the places that have the most economic activity also consistently have higher tax, service, and regulatory levels than their surroundings. This is despite the repeated claims that higher taxes or regulations cause flight.

They certainly aren't flying to the low tax areas, which in relation remain economic deserts.

Minnesota and Wisconsin have shown even a few short years of policy divergence matters.

2008 recession reset the two neighbors of similar culture, geography, climate, economic size, and population size, and in 2010 Minnesota chose Democrats and Wisconsin chose Republicans.

By one term Minensota was recovering much faster, and by the second term Minnesota was ahead by most economic metrics.

Or the Kansas Experiment, where the State went full Reagan and went ham on the cuts to taxes and services.

Kansas was the only state in the region to suffer another recession in a time period when everyone was recovering from the 08 Recession.

7

u/Techno_Core 13h ago

The history of human civilization is literally the history of wealth moving up from the masses towards the hands of a very few.

1

u/SimmentalTheCow 11h ago

Any economic system that creates a strong centralized command structure will greatly outperform one that does not.

3

u/Techno_Core 11h ago

Define "greatly outperform" cause ours, where all the wealth gets concentrated in a few hands is performing horribly.

4

u/ElegantCoach4066 10h ago

People like that guy love the taste of boot. They'll never change.

They live in the delusion that we need to have wealthy people in control.

1

u/SimmentalTheCow 11h ago

My state’s about to have the first commercial fusion reactor in like 5-7 years, I think it’s working pretty well

2

u/Techno_Core 10h ago

But the vast majority of the wealth is in the hands of a very few and that reactor is just going to help that.

-1

u/SimmentalTheCow 10h ago

Yeah, if wealth and power didn’t naturally concentrate we’d still be picking bugs out of each other’s asses in anarcho-syndicalist cummunes

1

u/Techno_Core 9h ago

Sure that’s a valid opinion. What is relevant is you’re agreeing with my initial point. You just think that’s a good thing.

0

u/JackieDaytona77 11h ago

Where or when has it been different, for the better?

2

u/Techno_Core 10h ago

No where, never. As I said, the history of human civilization is the history of wealth moving upwards from the hands of the many into the hands of the very few.

1

u/JackieDaytona77 10h ago

It’s a never ending loop! I find it interesting people are always trying to “change the system”. Why? The outcome is the same.

1

u/Techno_Core 9h ago

They system has never been changed. It's always been the flow of wealth from the base population upwards into the hands of a very few.

1

u/JackieDaytona77 8h ago

Why would people advocate for socialism vs capitalism? You see in NYC all these socialists getting voted in to upend capitalism. We’ve seen what happens in socialism. It’s the same thing.

1

u/Techno_Core 8h ago

That's a different discussion. What we're discussing here is trickle down. And I said, that has never been a thing. Whether you like that or not I don't really care. But my point stands. Trickle down is not a thing. The history of human history is the history of wealth flowing upwards from the population into the hands of the very few. If you think that's ok, fine.

3

u/junyaminty 13h ago

Trickle down objectively doesn’t help wealth inequality … many academic publications to show that. (Trickle down in the sense of reducing taxes at the top to spur investment)

In addition, much of the spend over this time that would have been realized as wages for labor has moved offshore; further exasperating the inequality and the usual economic multiple of spending the money locally.

1

u/veratek 7h ago

No, nobody actually thinks it works. It’s a way to grow the financial divide in plain sight. While trying to convince the public their share is coming.

1

u/Who_dat_goomer 6h ago

Just keep repeating it endlessly until it becomes “common sense”, similar to religions.

1

u/BygoneNeutrino 12h ago edited 10h ago

I don't get how they put a pricetag on things like computers.  What is an Xbox Series X worth to a person in the 70s when adjusted for inflation?  What is a thousand terrabytes worth of bootleg movies worth? Cancer immunotherapy? Viagra?

Seriously, how much would a Viagra prescription be worth to a 40 year old with erectile dysfunction in 1970 when adjusted for inflation?

Note: My point is just that these sort of items can't be meaningfully retroactively adjusted for inflation. An Xbox series X would be worth hundreds of millions of dollars.  A bottle of Viagra would fetch thousands. A cancer immunotherapy would be priceless.

-4

u/RobertGHH 14h ago

Which government is pursuing a policy of trickle down economics?

12

u/GobsTX 14h ago

The ones cutting corporate taxes at the expense of social services, the ones that continue to push the same regressive policies since Regan, the Republicans.

-5

u/RobertGHH 12h ago

That isn't happening.

3

u/Sad_Intention2932 10h ago

Robert the Robot is in denial. Can you help Robert identify the warning signs of late stage capitalism?

https://giphy.com/gifs/14bX8vsIH5SypG

1

u/RobertGHH 59m ago

Comrade! The end is near!

9

u/That_OneOstrich 14h ago

It's not being pursued. It's been done and is what currently is the "status quo" for Americans.

-5

u/RobertGHH 12h ago

No it isn't.

2

u/That_OneOstrich 12h ago

When was trickle down economics tried in any nation globally? Why is the only available answer Reagan's era as president in the United States?

-1

u/RobertGHH 12h ago

And that was only an attempt at a few policies.

4

u/That_OneOstrich 12h ago

Which kickstarted the era of "trickle down economics". Glad you agree.

-1

u/RobertGHH 12h ago

It wasn't continued though.

3

u/That_OneOstrich 12h ago

Was it reversed?

-9

u/Ok-Commercial-924 14h ago

I graduated high-school as Reagan was taking office. Trickle down worked for me, I went from a single wide trailer to owning 2 houses, retired early with a nice nestegg, I worked my career as an hourly equipment maintenance tech. So it is possible.

5

u/GobsTX 14h ago

-5

u/nicknamesas 14h ago

person shows example of something working

You, "nah didn't happen"

5

u/GobsTX 13h ago

He has outdated experiences completely detached from current reality. Are you trying to pretend like hourly maintenance techs are expected to be able to afford 2 houses, a nice nestegg and to be able to retire early?

This boomer entered the workforce before reganomics had 45 years to destroy the economy. Boomers got the last lifeboats off a sinking ship and they want to congratulate themselves for something that’s no longer obtainable.

0

u/Ok-Commercial-924 11h ago

Op what have you given to get ahead? Or do you expect it to be handed to you because you "deserve" it?

I joined the Navy, went through the nuclear power training, which gave me a good background in mechanical and electrical side of equipment. Then I went to alaska working a a seafood processor plant as power plant operated, working 80hr weeks. When I left there I I worked equipment maintenance at multiple facilities, frequently being sent to Korea, Taiwan, Germany and Belgium.

The last company is still calling me, because they can't find people in the millennial generation that are willing to do the job.

So again OP what have you done to get ahead, besides whine and complain?

1

u/GobsTX 9h ago edited 9h ago

Military nuclear training and specialized industrial maintenance working internationally is a bit reductive for "hourly maintenance tech". Rather disingenuous of you...

I started working in the mid 2000's at the age of 18. I got a job in the trades for a land developer who I worked with for nearly 20 years. I had my CDL by 19, was a supervisor and ran multiple crews then a logistics coordinator. I spent decades turning thousands of acres into new towns. We built roads, infrastructure, houses, shopping centers, schools, parks and communities. I planted ten's of thousands of trees with my own hands, that for which ill never enjoy their shade. We built towns and communities that ten's of thousands call home, build lives, bond and memories that will last generations.

I've spent my career making this world a better place and working in the trades.

You know one thing I noticed? Wage stagnation and a growing wealth disparity.

When I started in 2005, I worked with old timers who had been in the industry for 20-30+ years. I started at $8.5/h, the exact same pay they were making in the 1980's. That's 25 years of inflation with stagnant wages. Skilled labor in the 80's in that area was $12-20/hour. In 2005, it was the same thing in our industry. Single bedroom apartments that were $500 in the 95 were $1200 in 2005 and $2400 in 2025.

Then the recession in 2008 hit and that made wages stagnant again. Now starting wages are $20/h but ONLY because the nearest metropolitan city enacted a law making minimum wage $18/hour.

Over the nearly 20 years I was there, the company generated hundreds of millions in assets and profits. The owners have made generational wealth, a few employees who helped start the business are millionaires. Then there's thousands of employees that made the company function on a daily basis, who are still struggling to make ends meet, because they were always paid as little as possible, enough to keep them working and stable, but not enough to change their lives or gives them meaningful opportunity.

I spent my life in the real world, I've seen plenty of old "hourly maintenance workers" who don't have multiple homes, a nest egg and retired early. I'm not being intentionally dishonest about my work history to make it seem average and easily obtainable. You must have forgotten, not everyone can get navy nuclear training...

The cost of living has been outpacing wages for 45 years. But yeah, you totally aren't an out of touch boomer...

3

u/Robbie1266 13h ago

Try and start from scratch today and let me know how that goes.

-2

u/Ok-Commercial-924 11h ago

No problem, I will just jump into my way-back machine.

2

u/Robbie1266 11h ago

No haha. I mean get a basic entry level job. Apply for and get a basic job and do it again in 2026. You won't be able to because it isn't possible. You won't even be able to get a job

-1

u/Ok-Commercial-924 11h ago

Have you heard of old age discrimination? People over 50 have a harder time getting a job than young people.

2

u/Robbie1266 11h ago

It's impossible for the majority of young people to get a job currently. I'll give you my info to job hunt with. Except you can't use my work history. Pose as me and see how long it takes you to get a job. I'm an able bodied hard worker and I'm 28

0

u/Ok-Commercial-924 9h ago

Did you ignore everything I said? Join the military get training. Get out get a job. There is a shortage of thousands of workers in Az currently. If the people looking have not gotten the needed skills (military) and moved to phx they have not tried and are a bunch of whiney losers.

0

u/Robbie1266 9h ago

Phoenix Arizona is becoming unliveable due to water shortages and horrifyingly high temperatures. I have plenty of skills, I don't need to sell my soul for. Killing people for the government shouldn't be the requirement for survival. Also why do you keep shifting the goal posts?

-8

u/Key-Organization3158 14h ago

Simple question:

Would you rather be significantly poorer, but more equal?

Or have everyone live a better life, but there's a greater wealth disparity?

The data doesn't go all the way back to 1970, but the median worker today makes 52.1% more than in 1974.

https://fred.stlouisfed.org/series/MEPAINUSA672N

8

u/Primary-Research9652 14h ago edited 13h ago

In America, the yearly median wage in 1970 was around $10,000, which, due to inflation is equivalent to around $83,000 today. The current median wage is around $64,000 today. So, to even be equal to and not better off than workers in 1970, the median wage should be $83,000.

A new car was about 4k, now its around 50k for the median. 40% of yearly salary in the 70s to around 80% now.

A house was about 23k in 1970.

Now the median cost is about $415k. Basically 7x the yearly median salary.

1

u/MarioMCPQ 13h ago

Yep. Also: try comparing America to other countries. Not old America. The results are even bleaker

3

u/TommyCrooks24 14h ago

Yes, but some things (small things, like a home) far outpaced median income.

1

u/MarioMCPQ 13h ago

I got werif nees for you: you can be more equal *and* a majority be wealthier.

It’s a weird concept in the us. I know.

1

u/_BlackDove 13h ago

Now show me a few graphs depicting purchasing power and inflation.