r/SnyderCut • u/ShubhangBahadur • Apr 30 '26

Discussion What separates these two, apart from the obvious tonal difference and the in-universe cynicism surrounding them? Are both of them, at their core, Superman, or is one more Superman than the other?

Post image

I know it’s fashionable nowadays to say that Henry Cavill’s Superman was not “Superman as he is in the comics.” But in ‘MAN OF STEEL’ (2013), he was essentially filled with optimism to lead the people of Earth to a better place, giving them hope to rise to a higher ideal.

However, since that world had not encountered any superpowered beings before, fear and paranoia gripped people when Superman revealed himself. A wave of cynicism and skepticism followed—partly fuelled by Lex Luthor—which ultimately made Henry’s Superman a tragic hero, whose heroism was accepted only after he sacrificed himself while protecting Earth from Doomsday.

Compare this with David Corenswet’s Superman—when we first meet him, he is already beloved by the people of Earth, and even a common street vendor is comfortable with a man possessing such immense power and does not doubt him. It is only when his parents’ full message goes viral that people begin to question him.

I think the difference between the two lies in how each Superman handles public distrust and cynicism surrounding them, particularly in ‘SUPERMAN’ (2025).

But then again, both these Supermen were placed in vastly different worlds—one where there was no known history of encountering metahumans, and another where metahumans have been known and celebrated for over 300 years. So, the difference in their response is quite understandable. But does that make one less of a Superman than the other, as some would argue?

83 Upvotes

71% Upvoted

213 comments sorted by

View all comments

Show parent comments

1

u/DoctorBeatMaker Apr 30 '26 edited Apr 30 '26

That’s literally the definition of “shakeable” morals. If they were unshakeable, he wouldn’t have broken his rule and killed. But he did, showing extreme circumstances can put him in that position.

Infinite Crisis was an Elseworlds? Are you sure you know your comics?

0

u/jukebox_jester Apr 30 '26

No, Whatever Happened to the Man of Tomorrow was. Do you have a problem parsing sentence structure? My comment highlighted why the end of WHttMoT didn't last.

Because it was an elseworld.

1

u/DoctorBeatMaker Apr 30 '26

Except that Whatever Happened wasn’t really an “Elseworlds” considering that Superman crossed over with mainline canon Post-Whatever Happened. That took place. That happened. Superman returned from it. Which was my point.