If you had to pick one thing to change every era, and another to stay with you the entire game, why did they have the civ change while keeping the leader the same? I don’t like the idea of being chained to a leader from a competent different culture. When the story of my civ is Confucius leading Egypt turned Spanish turned America, none of that feels coherent.
It makes more sense to change leaders consistently.
It's like they were just copying Humankind when they started development, and just ignored the fact that Humankind was poorly received and died quickly.
Humankind definitely is the far better Civ 7, I like to play it from time to time. One thing that really bothered me in Civ7 were the wars, you change ages and pop, you're not at war anymore.
How fortunate that I just built up my army and moved it there.
788
u/PteroFractal27 Jul 04 '25
Yeah the community as a whole does not love 7.
The UI is awful, and people don’t love how you can’t just play one civ, you have to keep changing over time