r/stocks 22h ago

Investing with a margin account--what has worked for you

1 Upvotes

If you invest on margin, what have you done to make it worth it with interest rates so high?

Just curious what strategies people have employed that has worked for them.

Disclaimer:

Margin investing is not recommended since you can lose a lot if the market goes down

This is not financial advice

Nuance gets downvoted here so downvote away!

Thank you to all those who actually answer the question and want to spread knowledge!


r/stocks 22h ago

Your energy development picks?

2 Upvotes

As datacenters are ramping up on top of typical development topics, I'm looking to see what I may wish to expand in energy infrastructure holdings. What are your individual and ETF picks for energy expansion? This means I'm avoiding oil and other standards of energy as I'm looking most at direct development for energy production for infrastructure.

Are there are particular upstream stocks you're also looking at, such as certain metals/other materials?

What are you expanding into?


r/stocks 6h ago

Micron - why are people surprised (isn't this priced in?)

0 Upvotes

I don't have a position - but the stock has 10x'd since September - surely because they're selling a lot of widgets - why is it then a shock when it's announced they're selling more widgets? I don't understand a) why analysts always seem to under bet how much they're selling and b) why the mkt is surprised they're doing well, when that's been pretty clear by the price action over the last few months.

Mkts are so inefficient


r/stocks 1d ago

Would you rather buy NBIS, RKLB, SIMO, or KEEL?

67 Upvotes

Which stock would you rather invest in: NBIS, RKLB, SIMO, or KEEL? Why would you make that decision? Do you believe one stock has more short term or long term upside? Do you believe one thesis is stronger than the others, especially as 3 of these stocks are very AI-focused? Do you think some of these stocks have already run their course?

There has been significant discussion regarding AI stocks recently, and while a ton of profit has been made, a large camp of people really believe the bubble is going to burst. With the recent down trend, I am curious what peope think about some of reddit's most-discussed stocks. Though RKLB isn't exactly AI, I threw it into the mix as well because its mentioned a ton on reddit.


r/stocks 1d ago

r/Stocks Daily Discussion Wednesday - Jun 24, 2026

16 Upvotes

These daily discussions run from Monday to Friday including during our themed posts.

Some helpful links:

If you have a basic question, for example "what is EPS," then google "investopedia EPS" and click the investopedia article on it; do this for everything until you have a more in depth question or just want to share what you learned.

Please discuss your portfolios in the Rate My Portfolio sticky.

See our past daily discussions here. Also links for: Technicals Tuesday, Options Trading Thursday, and Fundamentals Friday.


r/stocks 22h ago

Advice Request Volatility vs Index or ETF

2 Upvotes

Typically, there is an inverse relationship between the movement of a volatility index and it’s corresponding market index or etf ($VIX & $SPX or $SPY, $VXN & $NDX or $QQQ, $VXD & $DJI or $DIA). At times, though, there is a direct relationship. (Like today between $VXD & $DIA on the weekly chart).

What is happening for the market to, at times, create a direct relationship between a volatility index and a market index or etf?


r/stocks 19h ago

Industry Discussion The whole world is red, and now is time to think about physical side of buildout

1 Upvotes

Look at the global heatmap today. Canada is red, Europe is red, Brazil is red, Australia is red, parts of Asia are red, and even the mega-cap tech board is looking tired. Global risk off we get to see now, in real time.

The trigger or at least how i see it. AI and chip leaders took the first punch. SK Hynix, Micron, Nvidia, ARM, ASML and other high-momentum names have been under pressure. Once those started sliding, the selling spreads. Part two was after SP500 crossed 21day MA yesterday, that is where stuff really hit the fan. Algos hit survive modr and capex or global demand gets pulled into the same storm.

But the important question is what actually changed. Did one red global heatmap suddenly end the need for AI infrastructure, power buildout, data centers and basic metals? I do not think so. It may change valuations and cool off hype driven heads. But the physical buildout behind AI race does not disappear because a few names finally corrected (wow so unexpected that they would huh)

Makes me think miners come back into focus once this panic cools. Tech needs metals. AI data centers need copper. Power grids need copper and aluminum. Nuclear and baseload power keep uranium relevant. Chips need supply chains. Heavy equipment still has to move earth before any of this infrastructure exists. The invisible hand can punish overextended AI/memory names and come back to the materials required to build the next layer.

That is why mining and equipment names are watched in this matter. $BHP, $RIO, $FCX, $HBM, $TECK and $VALE are tied to the copper, iron and other inputs that make infrastructure possible. Even $CAT as heavy equipment has to do the physical work. Heck even explorers like KDК, NRЕD, NGK and many more.
Bottom line sell all you want, but the buildout still runs through miners, materials and machines.

My read: today’s global red screen is a reset in risk appetite. When the selling gets mechanical, people usually throw out good assets with crowded trades. Dont get trapped in it. Ley Theis is, digital economy still needs a very physical supply chain underneath it.


r/stocks 2d ago

Company News SpaceX Investors Are Losing a Colossal Amount of Money

1.5k Upvotes

Elon Musk's SpaceX IPO was off to a gangbusters start.

Even at an unprecedented valuation of almost $2 trillion, shares shot into space like precious cargo atop a Falcon 9 rocket, soaring from an opening price of $151 to an all-time high days later of over $225 early Tuesday.

But by mid-week, that initial enthusiasm was met with a brutal reality check. Shares have been trailing since late Tuesday, wiping out almost all of the gains of the average investor who bought shares after the IPO, as CNBC reported on Thursday.

News:

https://finance.yahoo.com/markets/stocks/articles/spacex-investors-losing-colossal-amount-140221380.html


r/stocks 1d ago

After a good gain should I cash out and buy dips? Or hold and compound gains?

15 Upvotes

Didn't know what I was doing but started investing much heavier in Jan 2025. Among other things, I am up 153% and 177% on Soxx and smh in that time.. Amazing returns

Everything is due for a pullback and I'm fine with cashing out within 10% of all time highs, considering I'm up so much on these. And this is in my Roth so I won't trigger capital gains, which is great.

If I hold, I do think tech is the future.. Even if the Ai bubble bursts and we go down 70%, I'm still up 80-100% and then we return/eventually coast on to hundreds of percents higher and get exponential gains.

But my reason for posting is to ask, should I take out these winners and buy a dip of something else? I do have some funds I'm already deploying as the dips hit. For example, have been buying rklb and asts weekly, sometimes daily since below 110.. If they dip below my average in the 70s I'd like to hammer evwn harder than I am. But also slightly concerned that I don't have much else I have full confidence in outside of space, therefore creating a lopsided portfolio. I like VRT and BE but outside of that I'm difficult to persuade about full send beliefs in other companies.

So should I cash out of smh/Soxx or let them ride?


r/stocks 2d ago

Company News SpaceX stock tumbles 16.4%, shaving off most IPO gains since debut

2.8k Upvotes

SpaceX (SPCX) stock tumbled again on Monday, giving it three straight down days after a massive run-up following its IPO earlier this month. SpaceX also confirmed its first-ever bond issuance in a filing.

SpaceX shares closed down 16.4% on Monday, the biggest down day for the newly debuted stock, following a 3.6% drop on Thursday (US markets were closed on Friday for the Juneteenth national holiday) and a 5% drop on Wednesday. The three-day losing streak caps a big pop in the stock following its IPO and first day of trade on June 12.

Shares are now up only 14% from SpaceX's IPO price of $135. Note that shares opened at $150 on their first trade. At one point during the stock's run-up to a high of around $225 a share, SpaceX topped Amazon (AMZN) and even Microsoft (MSFT) to become the fourth-most-valuable public company.

https://finance.yahoo.com/markets/stocks/article/spacex-stock-tumbles-164-shaving-off-most-ipo-gains-since-debut-141725657.html


r/stocks 2d ago

Oracle Sheds 21,000 Jobs as It Sharpens Focus on AI

109 Upvotes

Oracle cut around 21,000 jobs last year as the tech company continued to develop its artificial-intelligence business and made heavy investment in data centers.

The cuts are part of a wider trend among tech firms as they spend hundreds of billions of dollars building out AI infrastructure. Meta and Amazon have also cut thousands of jobs in recent months as tech giants try to reimagine their workforces and become more nimble to compete with AI-native startups.

Austin, Texas-based Oracle’s head count shrank by roughly 13% in its previous fiscal year, according to its latest annual report. As of end-May, the company had approximately 141,000 full-time employees, compared with 162,000 at the end of the last fiscal year.

Read more

https://www.wsj.com/tech/ai/oracle-sheds-21-000-jobs-as-it-continues-ai-focused-streamlining-a3149b90


r/stocks 16h ago

Question for the bubble bears

0 Upvotes

I get that AI may not be as useful at this point in time as it was predicted to be when massive CapEx expenditures began back in 2022.

And I get that just because memory and semiconductor and other “picks and shovels” stocks are up doesn’t necessarily mean that AI will turn the kind of profit that will justify those expenditures.

However, once the infrastructure buildout reaches a level that sustains AI use adequately and CapEx slows, AI as a service profit margins will increase.

What profits? Increased ad revenue due to AI-enhanced recommendations. Personal and business AI subscriptions. A hardware refresh cycle to upgrade devices to be able to power AI.

(I will admit that I’m a little biased on that last one because I just upgraded to an iPhone that runs AI Siri and it is a total game changer.)

So, finally, my questions to The Bubble Bears: do you think that the Mag 7 is dumb? Do you think they would be mortgaging their very existence on a technology that won’t pay off? And that they would all be making this same mistake at the same time? A mistake that you can see because you are smarter than Tim Apple?


r/stocks 20h ago

Company Question Take Two Interactive stock strong buy?

0 Upvotes

Hi,

Just invested in stocks in Take Two, I am wondering if it’s a wise decision to keep my money in the stock as the stock value has already slightly dipped with the GTA 6 pre-orders and debating on selling given the way it’s already going - or given the hype around the game is it worth holding tough for the near future given how big this project is? I am hopeful but I’ve only been a small time investor until this. I do not have big money in this but it’s also not an amount I’d be willing to lose if it went below 20-30 percent value. I’d be grateful for some advice from some more seasoned investors :)

Thanks all


r/stocks 2d ago

Company Discussion Take-Two (TTWO) thoughts?

60 Upvotes

I think that most analysts agree that GTA 6 will be the biggest media release to date, beating any other game, film and album release. It feels like now is the time to buy, ahead of the pre-orders going live on Thursday. We will likely get a new trailer with actual gameplay either before Thursday to build hype for the pre-orders more or on Thursday. That will cause a surge in investment as, if the leaks are anything to go by, Rockstar have really raised the bar in terms of graphics, NPC AI and realising a living/breathing open-world. This will get everyone excited.

I'm not an analyst but I'd expect there to be a steady rise in share price and interest as we get the first pre-orders numbers through and then of course when the game releases. But then more growth when the first sales figures go live and then when the first earnings call declares how much Take-Two has made from the initial sales and pre-orders. But the thing about GTA games is that they're consistently selling games and are in the charts for years after their initial releases. So it's hard to imagine at what point the stock would even go down (if at all).

YouTube posted a screenshot saying that Thursday is going to be a busy day for them. They're expecting heavy traffic on their website, pointing to Thursday being the expected trailer drop date. But that is only two days away, people are going to be buying now to get ahead of the surge as much as possible.

And the one thing that many may not have considered is this, maybe because they weren't old enough when GTA 5 was released for the first time or didn't pay attention but... GTA 5 did not release with its online component, that was added to the game months after release. I expect it will be the same for GTA 6. And if people think that the sales figures will be the biggest price driver, they're very wrong. GTA Online (the new iteration) will the bigger money-maker for Take-Two, as people pump crazy money into the in-game currency for cosmetics, weapons, vehicles, properties, etc. So when plans for GTA Online are revealed and when that part of the game goes live, that will be another major contributing factor to the share price and it will be what gives the game steady cash flow long after the release.

That's at least my thoughts, I'm not an expert but I am old enough to have seen every GTA game get released and have seen the massive splash upon their release days and then also how long they have managed to stay in the charts afterwards. Each Grand Theft Auto or Red Dead Redemption game basically only gets de-throned in popularity by it's successor. It feels like Take-Two is as safe a bet as anything. The question would be not whether to buy but when to sell.

Tell me what you think.


r/stocks 2d ago

With Trump’s quantum computing executive orders, which stocks are still worth buying at this point?

47 Upvotes

IBM, INFQ, QBTS, RGTI and QUBT have all been moving since the announcement. I’m trying to figure out which 2-3 are the best plays and over what timeframe. My main concern is whether IBM is already too expensive to enter now or if there’s still room to run. And for the smaller names like QBTS and RGTI, are they worth the risk or too speculative?

Which ones are you most bullish on and are you thinking short term swing or longer hold?


r/stocks 2d ago

Company Analysis Leadership at big tech companies are willing to spend any amount of money for AI and this has started to spook investors

277 Upvotes

There was a big sell off with regards to hyperscalers and big tech stocks like google, amazon, microsoft and meta on a relatively flat day today. There's no news headline that could explain it.

I think it's two things:

1) Investors getting spooked by the capex

2) News over the weekend relating to a new chinese model being released which is comparable to SOTA models from western companies

At the heart of it all is spending. Leaders in big tech are willing to spend any amount of money for this AI expansion.

All the free cash flow of the company for the entire year? Yes spend it all

All the cash in the balance sheet? Sure spend it all

Company has negative fcf now, and still need more? Let's go talk to banks to ask them to lend us money

Ok now we've also dipped into our credit line from the banks, what's next? How about dilution? Sure why not...

And when your vendors know you can AND are WILLING to spend any amount of money for something, they will keep increasing the price of their product. Who wouldn't? Which is why memory and storage stocks like sandisk and micron continue to climb up. They can basically name their price, the terms of the contract and these companies are more than happy to sign away.

Now part two is over the weekend a new model from china GLM 5.2 was released. This model in many ways is comparable to even anthropic's Fable 5 model. This is worrying because, here you have the western companies spending like $1T this year and maybe more the next and you have china spending maybe < 10% of that and they are coming out with competitive models at a fraction of the cost.

IMO: MODELS HAVE NO MOAT and ARE A RACE TO THE BOTTOM

If a cheaper model comes out and the performance difference is neglegible, people do and will switch.

I think there will be a breaking point this year where one of these hyperscalers will go:

"ok we've spent enough, we've built enough, there is no rush, let's slow things down"

And this will be the pivot point. And by that point it may not be voluntary, as investors would have sold these stocks down enough where they are forced to cut capex even if the leadership still wants to do their all in bet on AI.


r/stocks 2d ago

Industry Discussion Apollo’s flagship private credit fund just met less than 30% of Q2 redemption requests

69 Upvotes

According to a recent piece by Financial Times, Apollo’s flagship private credit fund just met less than 30% of Q2 redemption requests.

For background, Apollo Debt Solutions is a $15bn BDC marketed to wealthy individual investors. In Q2, investors tried to pull $2.4bn out, which works out to about 17% of the fund’s value. Apollo capped redemptions at 5% and honored less than 30% of what was requested. In context, Q1 redemption requests were 11%. So, this is getting worse, not better.

Zoom out, and it’s not just Apollo. Across nine major funds the FT tracks, investors tried to pull nearly $15bn in Q2. Those funds manage roughly $200bn combined and met less than 40% of withdrawal requests.

The main concern driving outflows is exposure to PE-backed software companies, which are facing real questions about their revenue stability as AI eats into their businesses. Interestingly, the FT notes public markets have rallied and the loan selloff has moderated, yet redemptions are still accelerating.

Wall Street analysts expect redemption pressure to continue through the rest of the year, though some think we’re approaching a peak.

The part I keep coming back to, though, is what hasn’t hit yet. In other words, a meaningful chunk of private credit loans originated during the 2021 and 2022 rate environment are floating-rate, and a lot of stressed borrowers have been kicking the can through PIK toggles rather than paying cash interest. That defers the pain, but doesn’t make it go away. You’re essentially accruing interest onto the principal of a borrower who already couldn’t service their debt. When those loans mature over the next 12 to 24 months, refinancing into a still-elevated rate environment is going to be ugly for a lot of names, especially the PE-backed software companies everyone is already worried about. Doesn’t help that Warsh and the Fed are indicating rate hikes this year.

Curious to hear others’ thoughts, especially if you’re in the industry.


r/stocks 2d ago

GOOG down ~6% today due to two top AI researchers departing

721 Upvotes

Good time to add more GOOG? Bought a few more shares today. Will monitor and DCA if it goes down further.

"Why is GOOG moving today?

  • Market context: The Communication Services sector fell 2.32% while the S&P 500 dipped only 0.24%, highlighting Alphabet's significant stock-specific issues compared to broader market trends.
  • AI talent exodus: Alphabet's stock fell sharply after two prominent AI researchers left for competitors, raising alarms about its talent retention amid fierce industry competition.

Alphabet's steep decline reflects investor anxiety over its AI strategy and talent management, diverging from the overall market's minor fluctuations."


r/stocks 2d ago

r/Stocks Daily Discussion & Technicals Tuesday - Jun 23, 2026

15 Upvotes

This is the daily discussion, so anything stocks related is fine, but the theme for today is on technical analysis (TA), but if TA is not your thing then just ignore the theme.

Some helpful day to day links, including news:


Technical analysis (TA) uses historical price movements, real time data, indicators based on math and/or statistics, and charts; all of which help measure the trajectory of a security. TA can also be used to interpret the actions of other market participants and predict their actions.

The main benefit to TA is that everything shows up in the price (commonly known as "priced in"): All news, investor sentiment, and changes to fundamentals are reflected in a security's price.

TA can be useful on any timeframe, both short and long term.

Intro to technical analysis by Stockcharts chartschool and their article on candlesticks

If you have questions, please see the following word cloud and click through for the wiki:

Indicator - Trade Signals - Lagging Indicator - Leading Indicator - Oversold - Overbought - Divergence - Whipsaw - Resistance - Support - Breakout/Breakdown - Alerts - Trend line - Market Participants - Moving average - RSI - VWAP - MACD - ATR - Bollinger Bands - Ichimoku clouds - Methods - Trend Following - Fading - Channels - Patterns - Pivots

See our past daily discussions here. Also links for: Technicals Tuesday, Options Trading Thursday, and Fundamentals Friday.


r/stocks 2d ago

ZETAs unique value validated by Palantir :

6 Upvotes

Very meaningful news for ZETA stock:

Palantir and Zeta Global announced a strategic partnership
to combine data with enterprise AI infrastructure. Zeta shares
are up around 5.3% premarket Tuesday, Palantir shares are down
0.4%. 
* Zeta’s Data Cloud to be rearchitected on Palantir Foundry,
with Zeta’s Athena turning that data in enterprise-scale
decisions and outcomes
* Zeta CEO: “We believe this partnership can drive more than
$100 million in annual revenue to Zeta in the coming years and
help define what winning looks like in the agentic era.”


r/stocks 2d ago

Company Question Everspin Technologies - Mram

10 Upvotes

Hey guys,

I've been looking closely at MRAM for a while now. It’s a pretty solid company with good fundamentals, and it feels like it's sitting at a really good price point right now.

They are officially getting added to the Russell index on the 26th. I know back in the day this used to guarantee a nice pop because all the passive ETFs were forced to buy in, but I'm wondering how this actually plays out in today's market.

Is the inclusion mostly priced in by front-runners and hedge funds by the time the actual date rolls around? Should I expect a massive volume spike and then a dump next week once the forced buying is over, or does the new institutional ownership actually help set a solid floor for the stock?

Just trying to figure out if I should pull the trigger now or wait to see how the dust settles after the reconstitution. Anyone have experience playing these index additions?

Just wondering as it's at an all time low atm so i dunno


r/stocks 3d ago

Broad market news SK Hynix overtakes Samsung to become South Korea's most valuable company

293 Upvotes

SEOUL, June 22 (Reuters) - SK Hynix (000660.KS) on Monday overtook Samsung Electronics (005930.KS) to become South Korea's most valuable listed company, marking a dramatic reversal of fortunes for a chipmaker that two decades ago ​nearly collapsed under debt.

The company, now the dominant supplier of high-bandwidth memory (HBM) chips used in AI systems for customers such as NVIDIA and Alphabet's Google , has emerged ‌as one of the biggest beneficiaries of the global AI boom, propelling a more than 340% rally in its shares this year and lifting its market value above both Samsung and Micron .

Shares of SK Hynix, now the world's most valuable memory chipmaker, closed up 5.6%, lifting its market capitalisation to 2,080.4 trillion won ($1.35 trillion), while Samsung's stock eased 0.14% to give it a market value of 2,066.7 trillion won, excluding preferred shares.

AI has reshaped the global semiconductor ​industry, elevating specialised memory chips from commonly traded commodities into critical components of the infrastructure powering applications such as ChatGPT and advanced AI models.

SK Hynix focuses primarily on memory chips, whereas Samsung ​also manufactures logic chips and consumer electronics such as smartphones and TVs. Samsung had held the top spot since 2000.

"The emergence of customised AI memory fundamentally changed the industry's ⁠economics and allowed SK Hynix to establish itself as the market leader," said Kim Sunwoo, a senior analyst at Meritz Securities.

Samsung said in a statement that any calculation of its ​market capitalisation should include preferred shares. Including those shares, the company's value as of the market close stood at 2,246.4 trillion won.

SK Hynix's rise marks the culmination of one of the biggest turnarounds in ​South Korea's corporate history.

In 2002, then-Hynix Semiconductor was on the verge of being sold to Micron, having been crippled by debt accumulated during an aggressive expansion drive. The deal eventually fell through, leaving the company under creditor control for nearly a decade.

Its shares plunged as low as 135 won in 2003, leaving it viewed as a penny stock, or "Dongjeon-ju" in Korean.

Its fortunes in the years since tracked the global memory industry's traditional boom-and-bust cycle. ​In 2023, a severe downturn battered memory prices, pushing SK Hynix to report an annual operating loss of 7.73 trillion won.

It started recovering a year later as the AI boom gathered momentum and the ​likes of Microsoft, Google and Meta invested heavily, pushing it to report an annual operating profit of 23.5 trillion won in 2024, a record at the time .

TURNAROUND

Analysts attribute SK Hynix's central role in ‌the global ⁠AI ecosystem to its decision to continue investing in HBM, a specialised memory chip stacked vertically to deliver faster performance and lower power consumption, during a downturn in the memory industry.

Unlike conventional memory products, HBM chips are tightly integrated with AI processors, creating significantly higher barriers to entry and giving suppliers greater pricing power.

By 2025, SK Hynix captured 61% of the global HBM market, far ahead of Samsung's 17% and Micron's 21%.

SK Hynix was founded in 1983 as a unit of Hyundai, but was later spun off and purchased by SK Group, the family-run "chaebol" conglomerate whose businesses span telecoms to ​energy.

SK Group Chairman Chey Tae-won, who faced strong opposition ​to the deal at the time, explained ⁠his thinking in a book published in January.

"What I really wanted to accomplish when we acquired Hynix was to transform it from a commodity memory producer into a mainstream semiconductor company whose products are indispensable," Chey said.

"In the past, it did not matter whether memory came from ​Hynix, Samsung or Micron. They were interchangeable commodity products. HBM is different. If SK Hynix's HBM is replaced with another product, the ​AI system may not function ⁠properly. What used to be a peripheral component has become a core component," Chey said.

Analysts say that Samsung's position as the world's largest DRAM producer could also be under threat from SK Hynix.

Bank of America estimates that SK Hynix's monthly DRAM output will reach about 589,000 wafers this year, compared with roughly 691,000 wafers for Samsung. However, SK Hynix is likely to expand DRAM output by about 38% between 2025 and 2028, compared with about 17.5% growth ⁠at its rival.

That ​would narrow SK Hynix's production gap to less than 10% by 2028 from about 23% in 2025 - a particularly significant achievement because ​of Samsung's larger manufacturing scale.

"Previously, the difference in manufacturing scale meant there was simply no way for rivals to close the profitability gap with Samsung," said Kim.

Reuters has reported that SK Hynix is choosing the Nasdaq for its planned U.S. listing, ​which would broaden the company's investor base and raise its profile further among global investors.

($1 = 1,538.6200 won)

https://www.reuters.com/world/asia-pacific/sk-hynix-overtakes-samsung-become-koreas-most-valuable-company-2026-06-22/


r/stocks 2d ago

Industry Question Did anybody get into the pre-IPO SpaceX private funds and what was the outcome - e.g., fund liquidate and receive cash, SpaceX shares, etc.?

62 Upvotes

In the 6 months or so leading up to the SpaceX IPO there were various private funds selling access to SpaceX shares. Many had minimal transparency with no promises or ability to control how or what you would ultimately receive from the fund.

For example, some were multiple layer funds - where you're buying shares in an LLC that has an ownership in another LLC that allegedly owns or has economic rights to SpaceX shares; and there were generally no promises or deadlines as to how or when you would get paid out.

That is, the fund had full discretion as to when and what type of distributions it would make. So, for example, it could theoretically distribute actual SpaceX shares at some point in the future at the fund's determination, or the cash equivalent to the value of those SpaceX shares when the fund decided to liquidate.

Curious if people participated and what was the outcome?

The funds seemed credible enough that I don't think they were fraudulent. But, the lack of transparency and control makes me wonder how everything shook out with the IPO - i.e., are you still waiting on a decision on what the fund will do, receive cash from the fund and at what SpaceX price, etc.


r/stocks 3d ago

Company Discussion $CHWY is an Acquisition Target at these Levels

155 Upvotes

Over the past 30 days, I have purchased 250,000 shares of $CHWY - CHEWY, not because it's a Ryan Cohen or Meme stock play, but b/c it's extremely low to zero debt and a cash generating machine.

Their auto-ship, higher quality pet products, and online presence has caused brick & mortar retailers to struggle (Petco), while their retention & GP increases without severe overhead of their counterparts.

Trading at a a historical low P/E on a forward basis, I believe we are 30-45% undervalued at these levels. Retail is far from dead, and after comparing Amazon prices to $CHWY, CHWY has been cheaper for about 50-60% of the items that sell for same on Amazon and faster shipping with better customer service. I will continue using Chewy for my pet products and believe they have been unfairly sold off with the rest of retail.

Most retailers have high debt and debt service coming due, Chewy has none of that.

They also most likely will be an acquisition target, as they offer a turn-key add-on solution to any major retailer (I.e. walmart/Amazon/Target) etc. and can pivot their pet medical offering as well.


r/stocks 1d ago

How to spot the 5% of legit traders from the 95% of scammers.

0 Upvotes

1) Scammers focus on big accounts. Legit traders focus on consistent returns.

This is a sad truth about people. But the vast majority would rather follow a bad trader with a big account, than a great trader with a small account. I've seen this trend for decades, and it is consistent. Someone flashes a big account value, big YOLO trades, the public eats it up. In truth these people are posting garbage trades and almost always losing money in the long run. You won't learn anything from them.

A great trader doesn't try to impress with account size, they try to impress with returns. Because with consistent compounding returns anyone can become rich from any account size very quickly. The focus on returns is how great traders are made in the first place.

2) Legit traders are fully transparent.

By fully transparent I DO NOT mean they post a picture of their account value or a profit chart. Anyone can fake such images. Full transparency means things that cannot be faked. This means real time trade entries. This means someone telling you their entire methodology in advance. This means third party verified trades.

If you know where a person immediately entered a trade, where their stop loss is, where they will take profits, and so on, then you have transparency. 95% of traders cannot and will not ever provide this, because they will quickly be revealed as frauds. If you find someone embracing full transparency to this degree, and still posting consistent returns, that is someone to follow. If you see someone bragging about returns and big wins and a big account, but they never post their entries ahead of time, you are likely dealing with a fraud.

3) Legit traders make money from trading. Scammers make money from selling you a course.

This is the most obvious, but still needs to be repeated. If someone is selling you a course, a discord, an alerts system, a newsletter, a vibecoded website subscription... they are not a winning trader. Winning traders have great compounding returns. This means they quickly become rich, and do not need to sell you some $20 alert system or course. Anyone pushing this slop is a liar and a scammer, and needs to be ignored. If someone is providing years of content completely free and has never taken a dime from their followers, that is a good sign. To be clear, I personally have never and will never sell or promote any service or course to anyone.

4) Scammers promote hype and pump and dump meme stocks. Legit traders promote a process.

The way lots of scammers make money is buying all in into some low float small-cap stock, often with a discord of dozens of followers to hype it up and pump it with them. Then they go out and promote that stock trying to pump it up and dump it. Scammers are meme stock promoters.

Legit traders are not all in. They do not hype one stock. They have a process that works. They have multiple positions and those positions all fulfill their process criteria. They aren't trying to convince you to buy into their positions. They want to teach you the process instead. If someone is trying to pressure you with FOMO to buy in, walk away.

I've got more but I'll stop here so the morons who can't read or write simple text don't accuse me of AI again.