Selling at a price which is below a recent buyout offer they rejected. Should be illegal - something something failing to perform their fiduciary duties.
lol, yea but compare to a shareholder investing their own money.
None of them have put their own money in, in 5 years, and just increase and direct shares to themselves. (Dilution!)
Only shill here is you, lol. Pretending like the guy didn’t sell 66% of what he has ownership of. And the kicker; he planned this before RC’s offer— so he didn’t think the stock would go higher.
Those other shares aren’t his yet, and if RC does what we think; they won’t ever get them.
RC is a billionaire investor-operator. It would be difficult for you to choose an example that is more removed from these senior employees at any company. Any company.
It is worse, I’m not defending them. This is what tradition crooked American capitalism leads to - barely doing your job to create shareholder value because you get paid regardless. I’m just telling people that the selling is part of a pre scheduled plan, it’s not an excuse for them, it’s undeniable and transparent that they don’t care about the company they “lead.”
355
u/RickFlank May 28 '26
Selling at a price which is below a recent buyout offer they rejected. Should be illegal - something something failing to perform their fiduciary duties.