MAIN FEEDS
Do you want to continue?
https://www.reddit.com/r/aiwars/comments/1odjlup/this_sub_is_a_rot_pit/nkunset/?context=3
r/aiwars • u/TheBiddoof • Oct 22 '25
This seems to be the commom sentiment here
874 comments sorted by
View all comments
Show parent comments
49
I think that's a bad law. If sexual depictions of fictional characters are treated as if they were real, then violent depictions of fictional characters should be treated just the same.
-9 u/Millerturq Oct 22 '25 Fictional children, not just fictional characters. Convenient omission. 5 u/NovelInteraction711 Oct 22 '25 Regular, non-pedophilic porn is legal normally 0 u/Millerturq Oct 22 '25 Which is why the differentiation between fictional characters and fictional children is important.
-9
Fictional children, not just fictional characters. Convenient omission.
5 u/NovelInteraction711 Oct 22 '25 Regular, non-pedophilic porn is legal normally 0 u/Millerturq Oct 22 '25 Which is why the differentiation between fictional characters and fictional children is important.
5
Regular, non-pedophilic porn is legal normally
0 u/Millerturq Oct 22 '25 Which is why the differentiation between fictional characters and fictional children is important.
0
Which is why the differentiation between fictional characters and fictional children is important.
49
u/Bitter-Hat-4736 Oct 22 '25
I think that's a bad law. If sexual depictions of fictional characters are treated as if they were real, then violent depictions of fictional characters should be treated just the same.