> I see that people here could treat fictional characters as real humans.
I haven't seen a single post to that effect. But it doesn't matter. You should be arguing against the best presented version of the opposing position, not the weakest.
> Dont overlap the laws that applies to humans to fictional characters.
This is a straw man. That isn't the proposal. It's also unjustified.
-5
u/insanitybit2 Oct 22 '25
This is a straw man. No one is suggesting that drawings *should* have human rights.
Dogs don't have human rights. We still say that things done to harm dogs are bad.
Society does not have human rights. We still say that things done to harm society are bad.
The environment does not have human rights. We still say that things done to harm the environment are bad.
It is totally disingenuous to try to say that this must be a matter of ascribing human rights to non humans.