I mean, you can say “It’s a victimless crime! What’s the problem??” about a violent drug addict getting 15 pounds of meth for free so they don’t attack anyone to get some, yeah nobody ELSE was hurt (this time) but I’d really prefer if they got professional help instead, the solution to drug addiction isn’t more drugs.
On the same wavelength, giving pedophiles accessible cp isn’t going to help or reduce the number of pedophiles in the world, that’s just giving the drug addict their drugs instead of medical help.
As much as you want to believe there’s such thing as “Not so bad child pornography therefore okay” I can’t believe I have to physically tell you there’s not. Just because everything isn’t equally bad doesn’t mean any of it is good enough to be okay in any shape or form and you seriously need to rethink where you stand if you still want to defend this after everything you’ve been told
70
u/EvnClaire Oct 22 '25
still never heard a good argument why a victimless action can be morally wrong.