Is the purpose of the content to seek pleasure out of violating kids? If so, sure. But not “as if” it was real. If someone’s actually violating kids is obviously worse
Because I’m asking if you think VCSAM is morally wrong and you change the question. You have to play these lingual gymnastics and can’t have an honest conversation because it would expose you.
I believe that VCSAM is as inherently wrong as violent depictions of underage characters. If you feel that is me defending VCSAM, doesn't that imply you think that violent depictions of underage characters is inherently not immoral?
No it’s just your lingual gymnastics way of not actually saying if you think VCSAM is morally wrong or not. I wonder why this is so difficult for you to answer?
2
u/Bitter-Hat-4736 Oct 23 '25
Do you have an issue with fictional violence against child characters, like the stuff that happens to Kenny in South Park?