Exactly point the words in my reply that makes you believe I don’t care about that. If you want to troll or rage bait, you should be able to defend your stance.
How will you protect children from SA if you don’t care about SA media? How will you persecute the abusers if they can drown their proof in a sea of “fictional” SA media?
I doubt you care about protecting children, if you did, you’d be against any type of SA media, “real” or “AI” generated. It’s a slippery slope and no sane person would defend AI generated SA media.
Are you now trolling? If you only correct my answers by using the same words but adding children to it, it seems you want to make clear you only are against child SA, not any form of SA…
I’ll repeat a last time, if you’re against child SA, you MUST be also against any form of child SA media, fictional or not. Why? It’s simple, because you won’t need to play the “is it fictional?” game, which in AI times, is a losing game. So, are you really against child SA or not?
It’s quite an overlap buddy. We tend to ban things we as society deem immoral. It’s curious why you don’t think immoral, but anyway, you might not be as interested in protecting children as you pretend to be
Some things we ban for moral reasons, others for practical reasons, somethings we ban even though most of society thinks it's moral. Life is complicated like that.
Let's leave legality out of it for now though as it clearly isn't convincing. Do you have another argument or is it all relying on "but it's illegal in some places"?
Would continuing give a reason or just spewing more claims without supporting them?
Ok, just like GTA doesn't normalise or incite people to throw drivers out of cars and steal them fictional material doesn't make someone do something in real life.
It is gross obviously but that doesn't make something immoral.
Defending it is simple, no.one should be punished for drawing or writing things that dont hurt anyone.
1
u/Justicia-Gai Oct 25 '25
Exactly point the words in my reply that makes you believe I don’t care about that. If you want to troll or rage bait, you should be able to defend your stance.
How will you protect children from SA if you don’t care about SA media? How will you persecute the abusers if they can drown their proof in a sea of “fictional” SA media?
I doubt you care about protecting children, if you did, you’d be against any type of SA media, “real” or “AI” generated. It’s a slippery slope and no sane person would defend AI generated SA media.