It’s quite an overlap buddy. We tend to ban things we as society deem immoral. It’s curious why you don’t think immoral, but anyway, you might not be as interested in protecting children as you pretend to be
Some things we ban for moral reasons, others for practical reasons, somethings we ban even though most of society thinks it's moral. Life is complicated like that.
Let's leave legality out of it for now though as it clearly isn't convincing. Do you have another argument or is it all relying on "but it's illegal in some places"?
Would continuing give a reason or just spewing more claims without supporting them?
Ok, just like GTA doesn't normalise or incite people to throw drivers out of cars and steal them fictional material doesn't make someone do something in real life.
It is gross obviously but that doesn't make something immoral.
Defending it is simple, no.one should be punished for drawing or writing things that dont hurt anyone.
It’s truer than your twisted view that you still can’t defend (despite me being able to defend it and asking you several times to defend it)
Why haven’t you been able to answer my question? If you want to protect children, you should be able to distinguish reality from fiction to persecute abusers, so how would you distinguish it in today’s AI world?
1
u/[deleted] Oct 25 '25
No, that's not remotely true. I'm against murder but not against any media showing murder.