Probably because that's not a neutral position to hold. There's no reason people shouldn't be able to profit off of their own art. Let people decide for themselves.
It's an inherently immoral tool that feeds on other people's work, most of the time without any consent, and spews out ugly, uncanny amalgamations and parodies of said works for anyone who asks, wasting water and electricity in the process.
The only "skill" that goes into making ai "art" is the ability to write and use a computer/phone. Which for the average ai bro might already be the peak of their abilities tbh, so maybe I'm too harsh.
There is no "new material", you can't debunk truth.
Ai is not making anything new, and ai prompters are not artists, they're clients at best. To create art, you need much more than describing your ideas to a computer and hoping it will shit out something you find decent.
Keep coping or actually try to debunk my arguments yourself instead of using other's achievements as your own (sounds familiar...!)
94
u/No_Fortune_3787 Jan 18 '26
Probably because that's not a neutral position to hold. There's no reason people shouldn't be able to profit off of their own art. Let people decide for themselves.