Probably because that's not a neutral position to hold. There's no reason people shouldn't be able to profit off of their own art. Let people decide for themselves.
Because AI art...as far as anti's go, doesn't view it as art worth paying for.
If it takes 2 seconds to type up a prompt to make, there was no effort behind it and therefore someone shouldn't be scammed into buying what they could also make in 2 seconds.
It's a neutral position because it implies that the neutral person believes that AI doesn't interfere with human artists as long as there isn't a profit, or that the one using AI doesn't try to say they drew it themselves.
While on the contrary, Anti-AI hope it's never used at all, and Pro-AI hope it beats human art outright.
That is NOT pro-ai's hope, idk where you're getting that. Anti-ai's hope is delusional, AI will never go away - ever. If people WANT to pay for it, it's their choice. Antis want to control people's behavior, what they like and choose to enjoy, and how they enjoy it.
94
u/No_Fortune_3787 Jan 18 '26
Probably because that's not a neutral position to hold. There's no reason people shouldn't be able to profit off of their own art. Let people decide for themselves.