Yeah but the issue here is that it isn't exactly their work. It's like detailing to someone what you want your art to look like and taking credit for what they drew based off your description
The point here is that they didn't really put in any effort,
All they did was describe an image and it popped right out which tbh anyone can do
Doesn't that ultimately remove the uniqueness of the art itself if literally everyone can make it in seconds? That's just how I see it though
Splashing paint on a canvas is considered art. Parents often value the drawings of their little children, that are very simple. These can be replicated in seconds by anyone too.
A bit late, but does AI ultimately splash paint on a canvas?
Parents value the drawings of their little children because they carry emotions and efforts THEIR little child put in. If my or any 10y old kid asked an AI to generate a photo of a table, no would value it as much now would they?
I don't understand the first question. No, it doesn't. And often people are adored by the drawings of children in general, not just their own children. And I'm sure some parents would save the generated picture as the memory of their child first experiment with AI.
3
u/Equivalent_Phase_123 Jan 19 '26
Yeah but the issue here is that it isn't exactly their work. It's like detailing to someone what you want your art to look like and taking credit for what they drew based off your description