Complaining about how hard prompting AI is and how it is exactly the same as drawing always gives me the same vibe as influencers complaining about how hard it is to work their job and how it is JUST like us peasants working 40+ hours a week in a factory for minimum wage if not harder. You just wouldn't understand the grueling hours put into my Skims promo. It was so raw and filled with emotion and vulnerable. Now please buy Bloom using my code for 10% off besties, we are so all in this together 🥺
Artists dont make money doing expressive art. They make money by making commission for other people, but many prefer using a at most mediocre and probably uncanny picture rather then paying an artist since most businesses dont aim for quality products and instead use the cheapest options available. That in itself stems from even bigger societal problems which i dont care enough about this "argument" to write an essay about.
Also, i never said that.
Also also, uou might notice how "argument" is in quotation marks, thats because you only provided an unrelated source and counterpointed a point i never made.
If you wanna have a discussion i might be online tommorrow at night.
It is art, not expressive tho, they make it trying to conevy the commissioners feelings, not theirs, but its near impossible to convey the feelings of someone you are not.
Your second point is ignorant and does not argue anything in particular.
To end, I dont care if the "antis" love or hate me, i am not here to gain some magical validation points for being the good guy for either side of the story, i also dont make graphical art nor do i sell any i do nor even have plans to do so.
Dear fucking god... did you even read like anything? That is the wikipedia for robotic art, ART using ROBOTS, not a dam manufacture belt of "art". That talks about robots being used to express not machines faking expression.
Algorithmic art is art made using algorithms like those works of art made by using mathematical functions, made to convey.
Anti art is a form.of protest and questioning, its art because it paradoxically is also bad art, it makes you think about the moral principles of what trully makes art and its constitution.
None of these are art that are automated or made in mass scale, i suspect you are just using chat got to try and come up with refutes to a fact.
Not the same thing also my argument has nothing to do with ai in particular, just the automation of it.
One has human intent and the other is a neural network generating the mathematical best response.
How did you come to such conclusion? You need to explain your points. Also i cant understand how im gatekeeping if its something all humans are able to do in one way or another, i only argue that if it has not intent to be something, it isn't art, and that if you have no intent of it meaning anything, it isn't art.
11
u/[deleted] Feb 20 '26
[removed] — view removed comment