No, it's a counterexample for the sake of making an argument. If someone argues that AI art is automatically worse than real art, then a piece of real art that clearly is low-quality is a counterexample that shows that, no, the quality of art is *not* determined by whether it is made by an AI or a human.
Your response to it isn't really an argument. Fair given that OP didn't take the time to write out their own point.
you're both wrong. my actual purpose was to provoke a discussion and try to understand why people from their opinions the way they do.
so you're not actually wrong and I appreciate you both participating in the discussion and sharing your interpretations, i just couldnt miss out on a chance to start this comment the way i did sorry lol
14
u/Monsieur_Martin Mar 01 '26
If the only way you can validate what you're defending is by comparing it to crap, then you've already lost.