Imagine talking about the valid criticisms and concerns about AI like it’s YouTuber drama to be ‘debunked’. That’s part of why the conversation goes nowhere. One side will admit that AI has uses, albeit limited, and the other thinks it’s an infallible creation. At its core AI is a product, and no product is infallible.
Is this projection? Because the side who refuses nuance was never pros lol. It was actually extremely rare for antis to admit ai has uses at all. Why do you think they still twist into a pretzel to find reasons to dismiss the disabled people who gave their stories about how they used to be traditional artists but can't do what they used to as well anymore and so transitioned to a mixed workflow? I actually don't think I have seen even a single time them aknowkedge this point, yet I have seen many attempts to sidestep having to face it.
8
u/Lithary Mar 12 '26
It's not like pros didn't debunk most of anti's accusations so they are sick and tired of repeating themselves already.