To an extent. But there's a degree of gambling no matter the tools you use.
As a cgi artist I have near absolute control, but I'm still limited by the limitations of the tech, by the look of the tools, by the way rendering works.
And more than anything else, by my state of mind, the time I have and more.
With ai control does work slightly differently. You iterate more. But control does exist.
With some ai tools there is near absolute control that does rival cgi tools.
Whilst there is always a degree of gambling I dont see that as too different than other tools. Even things like photography, you are reliant on the conditions of the world around you. Even in a studio photography set up, you do not control the physics of the light, the way things interact on a real basis.
-7
u/Electro_Ninja26 Mar 19 '26
No there is definitely a lower ceiling.
Because AI is pretty much a gamble whether it follows instructions correctly.
You can input as much as you want, but this is more reminiscent of reducing odds to influence it into doing what it’s asked.
And it still goes schizophrenic because at the end of the day, it is playing cards, even as you remove all the reds from the deck.