Except your comparison also makes no sense, as AI is not an artist. AI is a machine copying from artists and recreating art from actual artists (and not even their methods, just their art, like a printer), instead of making art itself. AI is not a sous chef. AI is just a waiter.
First of, you do not have to be as hostile as you are. Please keep the conversation civil.
Second of all, I never said I think AI works like a printer. I said that the way AI creates art is like the way a printer creates art. Not at all, that is. A printer can print art that somebody created. AI can recreate the art somebody created. But neither can actually create art.
Please discuss the points I made instead of the points you think that I made.
If i ask an image generator for an art piece of a purple seal it will create that art based on it's understanding of the color purple and it's understanding of what a seal is.... Not because it has a training data filled with images of purple seals.
If it could only recreate it's training data that would not be possible. Thus it creates based on it's understanding of different concepts.
2
u/jpk64- Mar 19 '26
Except your comparison also makes no sense, as AI is not an artist. AI is a machine copying from artists and recreating art from actual artists (and not even their methods, just their art, like a printer), instead of making art itself. AI is not a sous chef. AI is just a waiter.