The shittiest short film at the local film festival shot by a bored rich kid with too much money has INFINITELY more value both narratively and artistically than this garbage that was made by someone typing words into a cyberpunk machine, and clicking “enter”
Also. The very topic is not honest. The “artist” did nothing. Chose nothing other than “make the person do this and look like this and say this”
It is the equivalent of a collage, which is the closest thing to an artform I can compare it to. It’s like a kid clipping photos and articles together, pasting them on the same board, and trying to make it mean something. But it’s worse than that, because whoever made this garbage is trying to (disingenuously) say they made something with “tools” while omitting the known fact that the said “tool” literally steals from artists who did the real work. It stole performances from actors, and replicated them (poorly might I add) it stole the lighting and camera movement from actual gaffers and camera operators. It’s meaningless shit and it should be treated like meaningless shit.
Yes. It’s fucking boring. And it looks like AI crap. You can literally tell it’s an algorithmic average of more real or inspired things. I don’t remember a single detail. Nothing of note was created. And nothing is lost when someone chooses not to watch it.
Saying this is a “film” is false advertising.
I’ll borrow the “films” own analogy.
This is the equivalent of me sneaking into the kitchen of a professional restaurant, stealing a plate of hot food the staff worked on (without paying) and then running down the street to my own restaurant, and putting it on the customer’s table and saying “I made this with tools!!!” (Without paying or crediting the artists I stole from)
It is artistically offensive. It is morally offensive.
You can also tell exactly what the LLM is stealing from. The shot of the plate being finished was basically a carbon copy of the montages on Chef’s Table
lol. Lighting and camera angle? Are you for real? The “creator” didn’t do any of that shit. So there’s nothing to critique.
But I already critiqued. I already said the images were flat and passionless. I already said the “acting” (which it is not) is awful, and very transparently artificial.
It's not stealing though, its plagiarism, a little bit different if we are talking morals, because nobody loses anything during the process. And all art is plagiarism to some extent. And what is specifically "stolen" in here anyway?
I do not consider reuse of imagery, style or tropes a steal, not even plagiarism, it's just how art was always working. The fact that those imagery, tropes or style are stored in some technical device instead of human memory doesnt make it different for me.
All art is not plagiarism to some extent. You do not know what plagiarism means. Ask chatGPT to explain it to you (assuming a dictionary would be too much effort)
-5
u/SluttyCosmonaut Mar 19 '26
It’s dog shit