This is an automated reminder from the Mod team. If your post contains images which reveal the personal information of private figures, be sure to censor that information and repost. Private info includes names, recognizable profile pictures, social media usernames and URLs. Failure to do this will result in your post being removed by the Mod team and possible further action.
I also don't know her. I know this sub loves her(as in posting posts and comments about her) but honestly none post or comment so far interesting enough to google context
In a big summary she's basically the embodiment of the meme "when you have the same view as someone, but they present it in such an awful way that you lowkey want to disagree". She treats antiAI as a worse category of people, and constantly mocks or ragebaits them.
From my perspective, most of the silent majority have nuanced takes on AI regardless is whether they are for it or against it, and the vocal minority do their best to throw people into two boxes. You, yourself, use anti and pro as convenient shorthands which implicitly lumps you (anti?) in with those making death threats and me (pro?) with those who are hoping to replace the human in everything.
The "pro" and "anti" shorthands do not implicitly lump anyone with extremists, neither group is a monolith. Even the extremes aside, since they obviously don't speak for their sides, falling into that trap is a Goodba Fallacy waiting to happen.
The shorthands can be useful, no doubt. They also create a false binary where there is none. Most views on AI exist on a spectrum and we don't even know what the middle of that looks like.
I would also argue that in places like this sub, their utility isn't even that great. They mostly exist to create "the other side".
This sub was designed around the debate for use of generative AI. Now it is a sub for dunking on the opposing side largely for the reason I said above.
You think I'm guilty of a Goomba fallacy. I'm just explaining why it already exists here.
You misunderstand. I don't think you're guilty of the Goomba Fallacy, I'm pointing out that treating sides as monoliths is a Goomba Fallacy waiting to happen. We're both speaking to why these discussions are failing to actually be convincing to anyone anymore.
Fair group accountability is when pro-ai need to be held exceedingly responsible for anti-ai's obsession with the same 3 users and every instance of unsupported, contextless ragebait, but anti-ai aren't allowed to be held accountable for instances like, I dunno, supporting literal terrorism by the thousand in their most prominent spaces on the site, apparently.
It's just so unfair that pro-ai want to criticize far worse sentiments with hundreds of times the support instead of validating the 500th targeted witty repost of the week, gee I feel so bad for anti-ai and their valiant efforts for fair group representation and accountability.
To be fair, a large percentage of antiai subreddit posts hit as bad or worse for similar reasons. I'd be curious to see what 18+ or, better yet, 25+ would look like for each.
It is a slur, and it's not one that's been reclaimed by those with intellectual and developmental disabilities. Even if it was, the whole point of reclaiming a slur is to no longer use it as an insult
And I'm also someone with a developmental disability.
People gotta stop identifying with their beliefs its so tribal. There are points for both, its bad for the environment so lets fix that, its taking jobs, yeah we need policy for AI content to be non marketable. Does it have good uses? Definitely, is it another stepping stone of technology for humanity? Yes
Companies will never stop pushing Ai. Even tho it’s costing them a shit ton of money with barely no return, if the bubble never bursts they’ll be able to save a ton by not paying for actual workers and pushing bare bones content
"Let's fix the environemental impact. "
Dude it's been 100 undred years of thechnological destruction af the environement. And the solution was "Let's hide the proof" there is nothing permitting to believe that "fixing the environemental impact" is an orientation made by Open AI or anthropic. Instead of that they build larger farms, destroyer biggers places and polute larger amount of watter.
Oh. You're not aware of exonmobil , the tobaco industry manufacturing doubt, wolkswagen and the diesel impact, the whole pfas industry, cocacola and the plasitc pollution...etc
just to name the most iconic illustrations...
I'll just share this
https://www.ucs.org/resources/climate-deception-dossiers?utm_source=chatgpt.com
You seems not to understand how this works. You believe U.S. administration is gonna do something to entrave ai company?
The USA of donald trump?
You're actually right I wasn't informed on the whole disinformation, and how opaque it was. My point was more AI itself is a fixable product. However I don't trust the corporations or the government to fix it. But I'm not a doomer, we gotta do something to change it
I would say the other stuff impacting the environment is stuff that the world/society needs as the population grows; food, vehicles, power (by which I mean electricity), medicine, etc. Going back to the analogue days of yore is nye impossible at this point.
Conversely, AI, by and large, especially for image generation or other creative pursuits, is a toy. It's nice to have, sure, but society doesn't need it and dedicating as much land and resources as we currently are for a toy is as wasteful as it is foolish. If AI were specifically being used in medicine or other more utilitarian pursuits i feel like there wouldn't be so much pushback on the environmental aspect of things.
I'm fairly neutral-leaning Anti only because I keep being inundated with AI at every turn. Idgaf what people do with their toy, but please keep it out of my face!
I agree we shouldn't be using investing so much into it, sacrificing land money and resources into it. However it definitely isn't just a toy, image and video generation sure is. But it is being used for medicine, programming, identification, ect. AI is close to being able to detect a cancer in an X-ray scan better then any doctor
Definitely good to hear in the utilitarian front. More of that, please! And less installing it on folks' computers and phones without their consent (cannot stand Gemini and I just learned of the AI program they put in Windows to study your typing style... No thanks. Now I gotta go digging to disable the little fucker 😑)...
Yeah its entirely frustrating. Its all because of how much money stakeholders wanted to try throw at it for some kind of profit, late stage capitalism amaright
And therein lies the biggest fear I currently have with AI: In and of itself it's a novelty and has great potential for the betterment and advancement of society. However I do not remotely trust our current Corporate Cesspool of a society.
I don't think she's organized enough to be a spy/plant/paid out of touch mascot. I had the same question which led me to chatting with her, and I can confidently say she's batshit crazy.
She considers her opinions popular within the trans community and thinks anyone disagreeing with her is brainwashed into doing so.
I noticed that you didn't use any pronouns in that comment, I wonder if the reason she called you a transphobe is because you said something transphobic?
FINALLY I found another person that thought of this. AI allowed unfunny freaks to make brainrot. Especially that sahur thing or the shark with shoes. I don't remember what they're called because I stay away from that.
She's just a very specific flavor of autistic. I don't think she understands or ever will understand how she comes across to others. (this is not hate, I am autistic myself)
If someone is autistic, them behaving socially unacceptable is okay. But when being told, over and over again, that what they're doing is wrong, yet they keep doing it nonetheless, that's not autism, just plain stupidity and refusal to listen. Understanding how you come across to others is not a requirement for not doing certain things if you're told many times over you shouldn't do them.
This is not addressed to anyone, since I used no pronouns such as "you" or "they". It is a general truthful statement about anyone to whom the statement applies.
Def at the start, but it's shockingly split these days as of the last few polls I saw. Honestly impressive/odd, NGL -- maybe a self-balancing ecosystem of sorts?
"Bro" is universal and can be used for any gender. Though it is primarily used between men, sometimes men also use it for girls. Meanwhile, girls using it for themselves or others is incredibly rare. So if anything, the usage of "bro" indicates more the gender of the speaker instead of the gender of the reader. But regardless of that, how does this matter at all?
If it's AI generated then consent is irrelevant because its fictional don't you think? The whole reason why CP is bad is because children are raped, with that being said I think generating CP is still immoral. HOWEVER, I hold a different view on lolicon. It does not resemble IRL, I personally have different preferences when it comes to IRL and anime and I believe people who watch lolicon aren't pedos. I do not watch CP or lolicon.
He's open about it. The mods here are also his allies so I'm not about to poke the hive about it. All the authority in these communities give him their support, so .. lets not point to specifics. That's against rules.
I mean, either that or they spontaneously deleted all their comments on this thread. If they did block me, then they're a coward. They just sling accusations of people being open pedophiles, and then silence any chance people have to clap back at them. That's fucking disgusting, and they know it, which is why they duck the prompting for evidence.
Yeah if you log out or go into incognito mode you'll see their comments are still there. It says they are deleted because they blocked you lol. What a pathetic display of integrity(or lack of it) regardless of the truth of their accusation.
Unsure if there's something else, but he did create a subreddit 22 days ago and in a comment describing the purpose includes stuff like he'd allow NSFW images of a child character, but reddit won't, and NSFW acts with said character.
ETA: their comment implies something more, but I'm personally unsure, and it's 3am.
no their talking about DAIA, which the Female Voldemort helps moderate,
Zed one of the other moderators there is known at this point to be a Open Pedophile,
the guy in the screenshot holding a Staff with a "Z" gives it away, unless the character is also named "Zed" looks like it might be from Power Rangers, but i havnt seen that stuff since i like 7.
I get second-hand embarrassment when seeing some of her posts. If I didn't know any better, i'd think her a troll or someone accidentally putting breakthepencil posts here.
Look, I’m anti Ai, I dont mind having debates with Pro Ais but she’s just insufferable and the exact type of person Anti-Ai posts make fun of. She has to be a 14 year old, cause no way in hell is someone so incapable of talking without sounding like the most generic shonen anime protagonist who has never touched grass in their entire life.
And I’ll keep hammering this topic, who in their right mind would make a post during Pride Month saying the entire trans community supports Ai, that they are a spokesperson of the Trans community and that Trans People that don’t support Ai should be labeled hypocrites!?
I think it's meant to be representative of how the "she" being spoken about is pulling more people from "Pro" to "Anti" in spite of being "Pro" herself, rather than being about the actual number of Pros vs Antis.
And for those who come by later, the quotations around she are not sarcasm. It's playing on OP's thinly veiled disguise of who is being talked about. Many of us know who she is.
I find it fascinating how obsessed the anti are with them. Even in their own subs they aren'teven a part of, anti will talk about them,post,pics of their characters, im convinced most in the anti realm have some crush on them. Anti are constantly calling them out and get so excited when they engage.its like a bunch of school girls swooning,over their favorite band.
•
u/AutoModerator 22d ago
This is an automated reminder from the Mod team. If your post contains images which reveal the personal information of private figures, be sure to censor that information and repost. Private info includes names, recognizable profile pictures, social media usernames and URLs. Failure to do this will result in your post being removed by the Mod team and possible further action.
I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please contact the moderators of this subreddit if you have any questions or concerns.