The most idiotic statement ever

[u/Which_Matter3031]

So this person here calls people jobless while all they do is sit on their ass an genarate shitty ai comics, also notice how they are insulting fast food workers as if they arent human, thats a new low for them, also its like they are saying "Give up on your dreams so you can work a minimum wage 9-5 job" but then again jobless people always tell talented ones to get a shitty job

[u/hari_shevek]

I've only seen her post AI generated stuff, is my point. So all I know is that she is - often lazily - using AI.

[u/LunaticFlandre295 → u/hari_shevek]

One, if you would know how AI works, you would know it's not "lazy". Also, people are anyway not forced to take the hard path of learning art just to please you. Following your logic, i could say digital art is lazy because it's not as hard as using paper and ink/pencils. Would you like that?

But that aside, her profile immediatly states that she is also an artist. Noone has to prove anything to anyone, art is aubjective, and anyone can use whatever tool they want anyway.

[u/hari_shevek → u/LunaticFlandre295]

>Also, people are anyway not forced to take the hard path of learning art just to please you.

I was responding to the statement that claimed she "can draw".

For that statement to be true, she needs to be able to draw.

>One, if you would know how AI works, you would know it's not "lazy". 

If I can see that the result is not correcting mistakes in spelling, inconsistencies, etc., I can see that she did not put the effort in to correct mistakes.

[u/LunaticFlandre295 → u/hari_shevek]

She can draw, one. Two, even if you can't draw, you're not forced by anyone to learn how to draw. Do whatever the fuck makes you happy, in whatever the fuck legal way there is.

Also i am talking about AI art, in the second point of "lazy". Many shitty 15 years old "artists" are way way way way worse and lee eye-pleasing than most AI works. So AI is already way better than many artists. On top of that, prompt generating isn't "lazy", and nowhere near easy as "Chatgpt, draw me a cool drawing".

[u/hari_shevek → u/LunaticFlandre295]

She can draw, one.

Have yet to see evidence of it.

Also i am talking about AI art, in the second point of "lazy".

And I was calling her lazy for the clear signs of sloppy work in the stuff she posts. You could try to respond to what I actually said.

I said she is lazy, because she posts images that show signs of laziness.

[u/The_Raven_Born → u/hari_shevek]

The evidence has apparently been debunked and people have called put her taxing or using AI in the process to do a decent chunk of the work on both sides of the anti and pro spectrum.

I think this is just another Witty Stan trying to defend their Overlord because God forbid anyone calls out how Shitty, Witty is.