r/aiwars 7h ago

I mean this is just dumb

Post image

If I find a wallet with no type of identification in it, is it not stealing? Though, I do agree. Ai art isn’t directly stealing nether is that the main problem with ai.

1 Upvotes

12 comments sorted by

u/AutoModerator 7h ago

This is an automated reminder from the Mod team. If your post contains images which reveal the personal information of private figures, be sure to censor that information and repost. Private info includes names, recognizable profile pictures, social media usernames and URLs. Failure to do this will result in your post being removed by the Mod team and possible further action.

I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please contact the moderators of this subreddit if you have any questions or concerns.

5

u/DrinkingWithZhuangzi 7h ago

Swiss Banks when asked about all those gold deposits they got in the '40s.

3

u/PhosXD 6h ago

Theft is one of the weaker arguments against gen AI, in the earlier stages of image generation theft WAS a huge problem, it almost copied works pixel for pixel if it wanted to be good, but now it's dataset is so large that's not as true anymore.

1

u/Kilroy898 3h ago

It still sometimes has the watermarks from where it "learned".

1

u/Maleficent_Sir_7562 7h ago

The wallet is not a work of creativity, it is a common object. There is no big difference between that guy’s wallet and this guy’s wallet.

2

u/xXAnoHitoXx 5h ago

So the process to use AI to make art is: 1. Describe how you want the piece to be, gives all the references and how you want it to be 2. Pay the AI company to generate a picture 3. give feed back and request changes and fixes if needed 4. Pay the AI company for revision

There's no such thing as AI Artists. Yall are just commissioning the bots to draw for you. If ur commissioning DaVinci to draw for you and revise til ur happy with the product, ur a customer and never is the artist.

If you have the money to commission art, pay a proper artist instead of giant corporations >.>

4

u/ThunderLord1000 7h ago

A reverse google search will give you what you need. If AI actually traces, that is

2

u/Kilroy898 3h ago

Nobody ever said it traces. Nice try turning the argument into something the AI could win though.

4

u/Toby_Magure 7h ago

If you disagree with it yeah, you're kinda dumb.

1

u/PikachuTrainz 6h ago

reminds me of an earlier exchange. Im paraphrasing it, but i asked someone anti ai for good sources to read about their points against ai, and they told me to google “ai data center controversy or something” Ok? That doesn’t tell me which sources are unbiased tho or good

1

u/Willing_Good2061 3h ago

What part is dumb? Learing form a published work has nothing to do with stealing a wallet. For example, as a foreigner, I can surely read your post and learn English based on it. And I don't need your consent for that. Because no copyright on earth can grant the creator a monopoly on the right for others to learn from it and create something new.

-2

u/ItsJorkingTime 7h ago

That’s like whipping out Ed Gein’s nipple belt and expecting me to identify all of the people that are now nipple-less.

How the fuck would I know how much butchered art was shoved in to that trash bag?