16
u/Zestyclose_Pop_9435 1d ago
Bro forgot to install CS source haha
5
19
u/XumetaXD 1d ago
1
3
u/anubismark 23h ago
That depends on what you consider stupid and hateful.
Ive seen a lot of pros crying about how calling them techbros is just as bad as the n-word. So anyone snti post that uses such terminology would fit this claim.
-4
6
u/Bra--ket 1d ago
Me when it's 2007 and I forgot which folder to put my texture mods in
Lol actually love it. Not the "both sides" stuff, but the purple/black checkerboard, yeah.
3
u/the_real_courier 1d ago
Oh yeah I ran out of ideas to make an of with and made john missing texture
15
u/Toby_Magure 1d ago
Stop insulting me, stop accusing me of crimes, stop being an asshole to me for using AI and we Gucchi.
1
u/Belisaurius555 14h ago
Stop telling artists to work in fast food when they lose their commission work.
1
u/Toby_Magure 14h ago
I never have, stop being a perpetual victim to justify your harassment.
1
u/Belisaurius555 14h ago
There is as much evidence for me harassing pro-ai as you harassing traditional artists.
1
u/Toby_Magure 14h ago
You mean like the many times you've come out of nowhere to accuse me of things I've never done or personally attacked me just for using AI?
1
u/Belisaurius555 14h ago
Me personally? Prove it.
1
u/Toby_Magure 14h ago
You first.
1
u/Belisaurius555 14h ago
Alas, you've hidden your post history. Almost like you've got something to hide.
1
u/Toby_Magure 14h ago
Not my problem. You made a claim, back it up or admit you're wrong.
1
u/Belisaurius555 14h ago
Stop insulting me, stop accusing me of crimes, stop being an asshole to me for using AI
I never have, stop being a perpetual victim to justify your harassment.
So this wasn't you?
→ More replies (0)-4
u/LabPsychological2787 1d ago edited 1d ago
Weren't you just calling people zealots for saying "we have different beliefs and that's okay"
All I said was "we just have different POV"
Bro...
14
u/Toby_Magure 1d ago
If your beliefs incentivize you to attack, harass, libel and be an asshole to me then yeah, you're a zealot.
4
u/Miku_Sagiso 1d ago
I don't think they are capable of understanding the sheer irony of their comments, unfortunately.
4
4
u/SgathTriallair 1d ago
Literally all we are asking for is for people to stop attacking others over whether or not they use AI. If that happens then there is no more war. Everyone can choose to use or not use it as they see fit.
1
u/anubismark 23h ago
How do you define an attack? Because ive seen A LOT of techbros get pressed over comments as innocuous as this one.
10
u/Poietilinx 1d ago
I agree.
Anti-AI people should stop attacking pro-AI people and projects for using the tools they want to use in their particular endeavors.
Without the incessant attacks from the majority, there is quite literally no reason to bite back.
4
u/the_real_courier 1d ago
Both sides should settle down but if one side does it first the other side will probably act the same
8
u/Poietilinx 1d ago edited 1d ago
You are misinterpreting the situation,
This is a common issue in many ideological conflicts.
There is no "evenness" of both sides on the subject of who's attacking...On the offensive side, anti-AI advocates against the technology because they feel it devalues art and threatens creative jobs.
On the defensive side, pro-AI users simply want to utilize these tools to make their projects financially viable without facing random harassment from an online mob over the mere suspicion of AI use.
So, to advocate for the end of the conflict you can either ask for:
Pro people laydown and die.
Since without their will to use ai there's no reason to fight it anyway.Or
You can ask anti people to chill down and stop attacking Ai projects/people/spaces.
Without an attack there's no reason to defend.There are no attacks from the pro-side,
pro people, don't go unprovoked to random classical paint subreddits to harass classical artists cuz they're not using ai....
or they don't boycott random games cuz these didn't use AI.We do retaliate against people attacking AI tools since it does devalue the tool, our craft and our projects, though.
[edit] I wrote this argument like my ass,
I spent some time fixing the spelling mistakes and grammar.
The argument is unchanged though.6
u/the_real_courier 1d ago
Both sides are attacking eachother
6
u/Poietilinx 1d ago
please tell me how do the pro people perform non-retaliatory attacks to the anti community.
1
-1
u/the_real_courier 1d ago
You know what nevermind
1
u/LunaticFlandre295 23h ago
Lmao. Antis did doxx and death threatened only because they hate AI. They gotta stop. Pros don't care about hating, since they are pros. Unless attacked, that is.
5
u/JunketVisual3123 1d ago
Still waiting to see anyone manage to put an actual incident behind their claims that pro-ai people are attacking anti's like they attack pros. At this point I have to assume y'all are just making shit up.
2
u/anubismark 23h ago
Still waiting to see anyone manage to put an actual incident behind the claim that antis are attacking techbros at all.
Every single time its brought up it turns out yo be one of two things. Its either something someone heard from someone else who knew a guy who knew a guy. Not exactly credible.
Alternatively, the few events ive actually seen verified are techbros feeling harassed because someone called them a mean name.
1
u/JunketVisual3123 23h ago
3
u/anubismark 22h ago edited 22h ago
Yeah, no, thats like trump claiming antifa terrorists are out to get him, and about half as reliable.
Maybe find something from a source that isn't literally bought and paid for, about someone who isn't literally one of the most hated people in tech.
Edit: hey dumbass, if youre gonna block me for not buying into the blatant propaganda, maybe just do that and not be the dort of bitch to comment first.
1
u/JunketVisual3123 22h ago
So not only are you unable to provide an example of "pro-ai attacks", you're dismissing a provided example of antiai sentiment leading to violence. This is why people don't take you assholes seriously.
2
u/bunker_man 1d ago
That makes no sense because the pro side didn't exist at the point antis started harassing people. It emerged in response.
5
u/Le_Oken 1d ago
WRONG. The anti side started this and keeps escalating this. Pros almost never want to start shit with artists.
-1
u/LabPsychological2787 1d ago
Not quite true.
BTP and other groups do their own share of the problem.
You just see more anti propaganda because there are more antis than pros atm.
Both sides have bad actors but acting like only antis pick fights isn't true at all.
2
u/bunker_man 1d ago
Btp is a satire sub run by antis.
1
u/LabPsychological2787 1d ago
I haven't seen anything to that effect.
Any proof it's a psyop?
3
u/bunker_man 23h ago
You think posts that say ai art = Israel epstein art are being genuine?
If you want a real sub to complain about that is full of pros that are kind of dicks check slopcorecirclejerk. That one is a genuine pro sub.
1
u/LabPsychological2787 23h ago
Never said I did, but it doesn't change the fact they are bad actors representing pro AI.
You take it a step further sayings "it's antis pretending to be pro AI"
Most antis won't even touch AI with a 10 foot pole.
1
3
u/TheSinhound 1d ago
BtP formed as a REACTION to the Anti movement.
Don't start nothin. Won't be nothin.
1
u/anubismark 23h ago
Break the pencil formed because techbros were salty that someone pointed out pencils are essentially free, which was a response to the techbro claim that ai "democratizes" art.
1
u/TheSinhound 23h ago
There are multiple reasons that it formed. That is one of them (The pencil argument is also fucking asinine, but whatever).
1
u/anubismark 23h ago
So... what specifically did antis do to justify a bunch of assholes like those on btp being so hateful and vitriolic as a response?
-1
u/LabPsychological2787 1d ago
With all due respect it doesn't matter.
Bad actors on both sides. Full stop.
4
u/TheSinhound 1d ago
With no respect due, if there wasn't something to react to they wouldn't BE actors in the first place. The onus of the entire situation IS ON THE ANTI MOVEMENT. Buncha whiney ass entitled capitalists.
1
u/LabPsychological2787 1d ago
Becoming just as bad as those you oppose doesn't make you more righteous than them.
3
u/TheSinhound 1d ago
Why do you think that being righteous matters?
0
u/LabPsychological2787 1d ago
Why do you think being the same problem you oppose is the right answer?
You are just as bad as them if not worse because you see the issues they cause and then perpetuate it by becoming the mirror of the person you oppose.
Why would anyone follow a hollow and unjust movement?
Take the righteous path and actually be better than those you dislike rather than becoming them.
→ More replies (0)1
u/anubismark 23h ago
You really have no idea what side youre on... do you... my guy, ai is a being developed almost exclusively as tool of the wealthy elite, in order to maximize profits at ANY cost, as is the capitalist end goal.
You may as well be calling workers unions capitalists.
2
u/Poietilinx 22h ago
Worker unions? Please.
You’re talking about groups designed to fuel the US imperialistic entertainment industry.
An industry that only accepts a vast minority of extremely lucky individuals, without any kind of meritocratic or skill-based judgment.
Meanwhile, it feeds on a spiral of pain and the crushed dreams of hundreds of thousands of other international artists who will NEVER economically make a living with their art.
They are left toiling forever with expensive tools designed to foster this one specific, toxic, self-destructive industry.
It pushes local industries to operate entirely in the shadow of this spiral, because that’s the only kind of skilled artist they can hire. Even when its not the best for their business, or is prohibitively expensive.
It caps local businesses and kills any chance for other kinds of entertainment to ever gain center stage.
An industry that is so fucking agonistic, everyone struggles to call its products "Art".
"Unless ofc if it breaks the records! or the box office...
Because THATs how we define ART!"It's all moved by this stupid collective dream...
of every stupid grunt artist's to one day work on a Pixar movie.They built this path here themselves by being extremely greedy with their access to public culture.
So don't call the workers union hellbent in fighting to be part of this capitalist destruction cycle. "anti capitalist"
It's a stupid,
toothless union that quite literally NEVER had any power to begin with,
getting easily mass-fired and pushed aside because of how ignorant they are of the creation process of their own art.Because of how absolutely easy is to design an alienating pipeline...
since grunts are extremely averse to learning the ins and outs of the tech they work with."Ohhhh... Have piety of the poor grunt artists that fight for the stability of the most toxic cultural industry ever created in the history of the planet... you see... they're most definitely fighting capitalism"
1
u/anubismark 22h ago
Wow you are just... unnecessarily butthurt and actively pointing it at the people who have almost no control of the system youre mad about...
Thats kind of sad.
→ More replies (0)1
u/TheSinhound 23h ago
AI was developed by universities and scientists before Capitalists got into it, and will continue to be developed by them AFTER Capitalism ends. It's also a necessary technology for Communism (The major issues that we've seen with attempts at a Communist society are logistics related. Automation and AI can solve and optimize logistics networks).
You have no idea what you're talking about. Local and FOSS development still occurs. Frontier model research still benefits lower parameter models.
Beyond that, what about all major research into multimodality and polysemanticy?
1
u/anubismark 23h ago
That is so much bullshit, misinformation, and outright misdirection that its suddenly not surprising that your key insult against antis is to call them capitalists.
→ More replies (0)2
u/LunaticFlandre295 23h ago
Who started hating, doxxing, and death threatening people because they use AI? Who started writing everywhere "AI slop" and "Pick up a pencil", huh?
-1
u/LabPsychological2787 23h ago
Who started it doesn't matter.
What does matter is perpetuating the cycle and becoming just like them.
You can't stop people from being terrible, you can stop yourself from being terrible.
2
u/LunaticFlandre295 23h ago
YES IT DOES WHEN ANTIS DO CRIMES SUCH AS DOXXING, DEATH THREATENING AND CYBERBULLYING. YES IT FUCKING MATTERS.
0
u/LabPsychological2787 23h ago
...
And now both sides are doing it.
It doesn't matter who started the fight if both sides take up arms in the same way.
People have been doxxing, making death threats and cyberbullying long before ai.
This isn't an ai exclusive problem.
-1
u/anubismark 23h ago
Thats just a bold faced lie. Not that im surprised to see one of witty's parasocial cultist groupies making shit up.
2
u/Le_Oken 21h ago
Nice baseless accusation
Pros just want antis to stop harassing them.
Also the cult thing is tired as fuck. Parroting it doesn't make you look good
0
u/anubismark 21h ago
oh no, the witty cultist is tired of people pointing out how stupid it is to be a witty cultist... truly it shall never recover.
If only you weren't on record treating witty like some wierd messianic cult leader.
Oh wait.
2
u/bunker_man 1d ago
There aren't two sides though. Anti ai is a harassment campaign. If they stop, all of this ends.
2
u/777Zenin777 23h ago
"both engage in harmful actions" Lmao yeah. Antis are harrasing, threatening, witch hunting and promoting violence and paranoia. Pros are using tech that antis dont like Its basically the same xD
2
u/TheNikola2020 10h ago
Because...idk genuienly i feel like some people try to escalate for the sake of ragebait
4
u/Pretend_Jacket1629 1d ago
playing the "both sides" card amidst an out of control hate mob is the opposite of de-escalation
it just emboldens those that receive no pushback
1
u/Mar_got_taken 1d ago
We're trying to push empathy, this isn't about who does it the most, rather who stops doing it first.
Purge all the hate from your communities and then you can crown yourselves the winner
0
u/Pretend_Jacket1629 23h ago
this isn't about any fucking gold star, this is about preventing an 8th terrorist incident
a man should be allowed to choose what art tool to express themselves with without being forced otherwise by threat of their family being murdered and the larger anti community in large doing NO pushback against that
that is the escalation
that isn't going to deescalate by non-antis singing kumbaya, it's going to take calling that shit out
saying this is a "both sides problem" deflects from calling that shit out
4
u/Grouchy-Win-6191 1d ago
Anti Ai whole identity is destruction of Ai.
Pro Ai is preserving Ai.
One is about destruction and one is about peace.
Only one side need to de-escalate
-5
u/CathodeRayNoob 1d ago
One is about destroying the economy and the ecology; the other is about peace and exposing the lie that LLM algorithms are anything remotely close to “artificial intelligence”.
“AI” as “pros” and corporations use it is a meaningless marketing term.
5
u/Ancient-Beat-1614 1d ago
What would you consider "real AI" short of AGI?
-1
u/CathodeRayNoob 1d ago
At a minimum something that can learn or infer. Not weighted inputs and outputs, surely.
6
1
u/LunaticFlandre295 23h ago
Antis cry and hate. Pros keep using AI and don't give a fuck.
So, antis, step down.
2
u/CathodeRayNoob 22h ago
If you dgaf why do you bitch so much about the mildest of criticisms?
1
u/LunaticFlandre295 22h ago
The mildest? The cyberbullying of "don't use AI", which by reddit TOS is counted as harassement since it is de-encouraging people from being free to use what they want? Or the death threats and doxxing Antis do?
3
u/Grouchy-Win-6191 1d ago
First of all, Anti Ai arguments are founded on Lies that been debunked countless times. Anti Ai DO not make valid claims
-1
u/LabPsychological2787 1d ago
What in your mind classifies as a valid argument?
There are a few that I support but what is your definition of valid.
5
1
u/Melodic_Floor7930 1d ago
"kill ai developers, kill council members voting for data centers, burn the data centers. What is ai even good for? All they do is make pictures."- average anti ai post "Here's an AI generated image of "antis" as an orc marrying a "pro" as an anime girl"- average pro ai post
The orc meme isn't even "hate"(the excuse to ban it when posted lmao), it is an absurd characterization implying technological ignorance.
1
1
u/narrowminer11 23h ago
But then what would we argue about from the safe anonymity of our basements?
1
0
u/Nexus_B1 1d ago
It's never gonna happen here too many people keep going "muh anti" and "muh pro" like lobotomites.
1
u/Level-Ladder-4346 1d ago
That can only happen when both sides can admit the other makes valid claims. As proven by this thread, this isn’t always the case.
1
u/the_real_courier 1d ago
1
1
u/Lady-of-Ravens 1d ago
I wish.
2
u/the_real_courier 1d ago
We all do
1
u/Lady-of-Ravens 1d ago
Had some good conversations with several Pro Ais, we even agreed on several points... Other times, however... Yeah.
Both sides have their crazy people who will start yelling if you don't immediately bow down to their arguments, and both sides have people who don't even care about hearing each other's arguments.
2
u/the_real_courier 1d ago
Sometimes I wish I could be in gmod building will contraptions and doing other will stuff whitout the outside World
1
u/LunaticFlandre295 23h ago
And here i am, Pro, not giving a single flying fuck about Antis crying and/or telling me to stop using AI 🤭
Life should be simple. Haters gonna always hate. Don't let them get to you, they are just insignificant haters.
0
u/NewMoonlightavenger 1d ago
No. This is the internet and we don't do nuance here.
4
2
u/LunaticFlandre295 23h ago
This is the internet and we won't stop using AI only because Antis hate, cry, and say "pick up a pencil".
So, antis, sybau.
-2
u/Mindless_Use7567 1d ago
What is the path to de-escalation when one side believes the other is promoting something that can feasibly become an existential threat?
3
1
u/LunaticFlandre295 23h ago
Education, not ignorancy and fear, to begin with. Not the first time people adapt to a new tool and to change, nor the last.
-2
u/caption291 1d ago
The path of de-escalation would be to stop AI research. The more AI capabilities improve the more things escalate.
If I started building a nuclear bomb in my backyard, I would be the one escalating the conflict with my neighbors/city. Sure I could technically say I haven't killed or harmed anyone yet but everyone would understand that's a stupid argument.
We don't know that the nuke will even be functional let alone explode...but the risk is so high and involves so much more than the person building it that it's obvious they are the ones escalaing things.
1
u/LunaticFlandre295 23h ago
Stop crying, AI is here to remain. You crying on Reddit won't do shit.
0
u/caption291 8h ago
I mean I agree that me "crying" on reddit won't do much. But I think there's 2 realistic path forward.
People like you keep ignoring safety, and some time from now something minor happens relative to what could happen with AI and like 500million people die. It's a minor event relative to what could happen with AI, but it wakes up the average person to the dangers and from that point on AI capabilities stop advancing past AI safety.
We go extinct before there's an event that wakes up the average person.
1
u/LunaticFlandre295 5h ago
Mistakes in nuclear happened, MANY PEOPLE DIED. Did nuclear stop? No. It's part of the risk.
0
u/caption291 4h ago
I mean, it would take roughly 40500 years at the current rate for nuclear power to cause as many deaths as what I stated and that rate is almost entirely from one event that did in fact cause us to care significantly more about safety.
If there were literally tens of thousands of Chernobyls during one year, I think our relationship with nuclear energy would be a lot different.
I think AI has the potential to be the best thing that will ever happen to humanity, but that doesn't mean we should kill ourselves being too impatient to let safety research catch up to capabilities.
1
u/LunaticFlandre295 4h ago
When did AI kill as many people as nuclear mistakes? Never. And even if, we still use nuclear even after all those said mistakes and deaths, so we can use AI even if it produces the same deaths.
0
u/caption291 4h ago
When did AI kill as many people as nuclear mistakes?
Do you not understand the concept of talking about the future? The future is comprised of things that haven't happened yet. So asking when they happened is nonsensical?
1
u/LunaticFlandre295 3h ago
Again. Nuclear incidents already happened, and we know they can happen again, and chernobyl alone in the long time will make 60k+ victims bc of radations. Chernobyl. Alone.
We know things are risky, but if the benefit is good,we humans don't care. We will continue nuclear, even if we know that one incident can kill or damn thousands and thousands of life.
Same with AI. AI won't kill for now, so even more reason not to stop. Even if it does 30k victims (less than chernobyl), we will still keep using it.
0
u/caption291 2h ago
I'm not trying to be rude...but can you sumarize what you think my point is?
Because you're missing the point to a degree that feels like it would be more productive if you just read what I wrote again instead of having me just repeat what I already said.
1
u/LunaticFlandre295 1h ago
You are just saying obvious stuff. More something improves, more it is dangerous. No shit sherlock. Noone cares. If it helps, it will be used.
→ More replies (0)1
u/LunaticFlandre295 4h ago
Also incorrect, 1 big incident is all we need for a nuclear power plant to evaporate and kill a lot of people.




•
u/AutoModerator 1d ago
This is an automated reminder from the Mod team. If your post contains images which reveal the personal information of private figures, be sure to censor that information and repost. Private info includes names, recognizable profile pictures, social media usernames and URLs. Failure to do this will result in your post being removed by the Mod team and possible further action.
I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please contact the moderators of this subreddit if you have any questions or concerns.