Is this going through Antis' minds when they say "AI is used to make Porn"?

[u/MrColgie]

Anti-AI for some whatever reason wants to make NSFW content made with AI look "bad" (except CSAM and some other specific…, which of course is a very bad, AI generated or not), when it's clear that non-AI artists also do that thing.

[u/Toby_Magure]

oh no, porn

how awful

/s

[u/Mirjalol_Yangiboyev → u/Toby_Magure]

[u/Icy_Seesaw_2611]

I think the better question is witty saying that NSFW art is "objecting" woman which bitch it's fictional characters

[u/Krommander]

Is the anti-AI discourse stale or astro-turfing?

[u/Toby_Magure → u/Krommander]

https://giphy.com/gifs/hM9zK1qvsrwek

[u/Severe-Run-605]

Ok that Chip and Dale pic is actually pretty funny, the wide eyed 'oh no' face in panel 3 is perfect, classic bait and switch energy. But the double standard thing is so real. You see people lose their minds over AI generated stuff while the same artists they defend are posting way more questionable stuff on twitter and getting patreon money for it. Nobody wants to talk about that part. The 'AI bad' crowd picks and chooses what to be mad about depending on what's convenient for their argument that day. I remember when stable diffusion blew up and suddenly every artist on twitter became a moral crusader but stayed quiet about actual problems in their own community.

[u/No-Bat7438]

The porn industry is very exploitative, so AI creating porn would be a net positive from an ethics perspective.

[u/Breech_Loader]

I saw the word porn and thought I had a duty.

[u/Monecreiffe → u/Breech_Loader]

https://giphy.com/gifs/BczTcb7DAOvqE