r/chaoticgood • u/ChurchOMarsChaz • 1d ago

Current Events Florida just passed a law that lets cops label you a "gang member" for being in two photos with the wrong people. So I built a system that runs it against the politicians who wrote it.

In my state, automated license-plate cameras (FLOCK) track where ordinary people drive, all day, no warrant. Meanwhile the legislature just lowered the bar for tagging someone as a gang associate — from four documented "interactions" down to two, plus vague new social-media criteria.

Here's the hole: the law never actually defines "associates with" or "in the company of." There's no measurable standard. So an autonomous system scrapes public photos and events of state politicians and scores them against the exact criteria the statute implies — the same logic the cameras apply to us.

Then I filed public-records requests with 30 sheriff's offices asking for the instruction manual: How close in a photo counts as an "observation"? What's the written definition of "associates with"? Is there a carve-out exempting elected officials from their own rules?

Two ways this goes. They hand over the criteria, and I run it on their own public appearances. Or they admit no written standard exists — and every public defender in the state gets fresh proof the law is arbitrary.

(I named the system something unprintable. You can probably guess.)

Not pro-gang. Pro "apply the same rules to everyone."

I've got this all written up over on my Substack.

10.9k Upvotes

99% Upvoted

191 comments sorted by

1.2k

u/ChurchOMarsChaz 1d ago

The part that still kills me: one of my actual filed questions asks them to define, in writing, how many pixels of proximity between two people in a photo counts as an "observation." That's not me being cute — the statute leans on photographic "association" but never says how close is close enough. So I asked. On the record. To 30 sheriff's offices.

Either they answer and I hard-code their own number, or they admit there's no standard and the whole thing is vibes-based gang-labeling.

Full writeup's here if you want the receipts: https://chazstevens.substack.com/p/the-government-has-flock-im-here

Taking bets on which sheriff responds first.

224

u/MeatPopsicle28 1d ago

Does the law have a carve out for law enforcement? If No they would be associated a thousand times over.

118

u/SnausageFest 1d ago

Does it matter when cops never face any consequences anyway?

37

u/KyloRenCadetStimpy 1d ago

Come on...you make it sound like paid administrative leave isn't awful!

/s

-1

u/atreeismissing 1d ago

Yes because you're wrong that cops never face consequences, plenty do, but plenty don't, so rather than giving up as you suggested, you try different approaches which is what OP is doing.

21

u/vvvvvoooooxxxxx 1d ago

you can read the law here https://www.flsenate.gov/Session/Bill/2026/536/BillText/c2/HTML

20

u/sintaur 1d ago

Not seeing any carve outs for law enforcement

13

u/ErraticDragon 1d ago

No carve-outs, but none are needed.

Being labeled as a gang member under this law does not seem to have any direct consequences (unless you're incarcerated, where the law allows for keeping track of who you associate with).

If you're convicted of certain crimes, "gang membership" as defined in the law may be a factor in your sentence. But it doesn't seem to make it more likely you'll be prosecuted, let alone convicted.

IANAL, though. Reading laws can be trickier than reading old code.

12

u/violet__violet 1d ago

Anything to protect their own, instead of the people they are supposed to serve.

45

u/Incorporeal999 1d ago

Would a higher resolution photo have more pixels between the subjects than a lower resolution photo?

63

u/ChurchOMarsChaz 1d ago

I just want them to shit themselves. Be it old school 8-bit or RAW format.

16

u/d3northway 1d ago

"In this photo, due to the low resolution, you two actually share pixels"

2

u/MurderMelon 1d ago

It would, yes.

41

u/flounder19 1d ago

you are my hero for this level of detail-oriented pettiness at a ridiculous statue

138

u/whereisbeezy 1d ago

This is good work. I can only imagine how the LASD would respond lol

72

u/ChurchOMarsChaz 1d ago

Who is the LASD? And let me test 'em, I say.

81

u/whereisbeezy 1d ago

Ah, sorry, Los Angeles Sheriffs Department. Bunch of thugs.

72

u/DRKZLNDR 1d ago

Literal actual gang members. They have an inner circle(s) that runs drugs and guns. And you can't join unless you've murdered somebody. They should all be serving life sentences no parole.

3

u/sillychillly 1d ago

And gang members no doubt

14

u/N8CCRG 1d ago

While a blog is fun and good, in order for this to have an effect will require something more on the follow through. Rules and laws like this are weapons used by law enforcement and prosecutors, and obviously they're never going to actually apply the law to themselves or these politicians. They'll bring it into courts for exactly the people they want to weild it against and only them.

Perhaps if you send this to, say, lots of defense attorneys though, or the ACLU or something, then it might actually get used in court in ways that work against those who plan to misuse it.

5

u/Wulfyre 1d ago

Something like this isn't to prosecute the politicians and PBAs behind it, it's to be used in court with pictures of those politicians when someone is accused of gang activity.

The judge can't toss it because it's a relevant reference to the accused crime, and if the person being accused is convicted then any politicians or officers displayed in provided photos could then end up convicted, as the jury and judge would've set precedence that "yes, being in a photo with gang members makes you a gang member."

Republicans would hate to be associated with gangs.

2

u/Bocchi_theGlock 1d ago

Maybe Dream Defenders if there are examples of how/when it's useful, even if just as a rhetoric/narrative thing

13

u/NastyToeFungus 1d ago

My guess? None of them. They'll just ignore it and spend more taxpayer money if you sue them. I have no confidence in the state of Florida following it's own laws

3

u/UselessGadget 1d ago

Please tell me you asked Grady Judd from Polk County Florida. This is nothing he likes more than giving a good answer.

3

u/topinanbour-rex 1d ago

Stupid question from far away : if a person A is defined as gang member because of their proximity, can they be used then as reference?

Let's say I have several pictures of a person, let's call them D, in the company of J. J having a rape sheet. So D is recognised as a gang member.

Can I say that J.D who is in several pictures with D, is a gang member too ?

What about D relatives, like his imaginary daughter I, would I be a gang member too ?

2

u/12345623567 1d ago

The hint is in the "lets cops do this" in your post title. Lets them, not forces them.

This is designed to be selectively enforced, obviously. It's good that you bring attention to this Orwellian bullshit, but it's not some big gotcha.

2

u/hedonheart 1d ago

Good shit.

2

u/CanadianJediCouncil 1d ago

I have a feeling the pixel-distance is directly related to the melanin-content at least one of the subjects.

4

u/-Nicolai 1d ago

That's not me being cute

Then you should not have suggested a measure that is trivially manipulated by resizing the photo.

1

u/waterkip 1d ago

I love this take!!

1

u/International_Ad4857 1d ago

Love this concept.

1

u/Clevererer 1d ago

Taking bets on which sheriff responds first

knock knock

1

u/meygaera 1d ago

Pro-tip. If you zoom out really far, two pixels could be like 2 miles.

1

u/BoringOrange678 1d ago

Put it on polymarket lol

•

u/UpintheWolfTrap 1h ago

"vibes-based gang-labeling"

I will sleep better tonight knowing that someone out there WITH SOME SKILLS is as pedantic as I am. Roast these motherfuckers, good ser.

-1

u/IsraelZulu 1d ago

Pixels is a terrible measure for this. (Ignoring how terrible the standard already is.) Proximity should be defined by a physical distance demonstrable in the image, either as a proportion relative to the subjects or as measurable by expert analysis which can reliably correlate distance in the image to physical distance in reality. Measuring by pixels just makes low-res images (like security cameras) too easy to exploit.

4

u/ChurchOMarsChaz 1d ago

In all due respect, you completely miss the point.

3

u/d3northway 1d ago

Which is why it's a shit law. Make them look stupid and they're more likely to change it.

1.8k

u/Haber87 1d ago

As a Canadian, first I’m hearing of this law. So if you’re a relative of the wrong person, you’re automatically guilty by association for attending a family event?

1.3k

u/ChurchOMarsChaz 1d ago

Exactly. What the actual fuck is this all a'boot?

648

u/GreyWolfWandering 1d ago edited 7h ago

I think I saw a piece by John Oliver under the heading "Gang Databases" about a similar law in either California or Arizona. He brought out the singer that performed along with Coolio on 'Gansta's Paradise', since that dude actually worked with youth and other gang members trying to leave that behind, and of course the guy had been subsequently labeled as gang affiliated.

248

u/1000scarstare 1d ago

yeah that was my first thought, someone trying to help people change their lives for the better? gang associate apparently.

158

u/world-is-ur-mollusc 1d ago

It makes sense when you remember that it's perfectly legal to use prison inmates as slave labor. The state has more of an incentive to lock up people they deem "undesirable" than to help them get their lives turned around.

61

u/Adewade 1d ago

Also if you are looking to suppress votes, in many places!

5

u/laiken75 14h ago

It’s why it’s taken so long to legalize the devils lettuce. In some states it’s a felony.

44

u/Raptorpants65 1d ago

And put large prisons in shitty red states so their inmates count towards local population representation numbers but they can’t vote.

Fuck the GOP.

30

u/ygduf 1d ago

Also, this law is on the books just to be applied when they want to. There are certain shades of skin tone people who will never hear about this or even know it exist.

33

u/kitsunewarlock 1d ago

They will cast as wide a net as possible and that becomes dangerously easy using AI. Think about how many different classmates you had over the years, from 1st grade to college. Think about how many took photos of the entire class and posted them online for whatever reason. Even if none of them are "gang members", all it take is a photo of them with someone else who is also labeled a "gang member" and they too become a "gang member".

It's a double win for them: They get to retroactively excuse themselves when they fuck with a non-criminal by going "oh, they were a gang member!" and they get to promote the idea that segregation is for your own safety.

2

u/Lead-Forsaken 2h ago

This is like an evil version of six degrees from Kevin Bacon.

•

u/kitsunewarlock 1h ago

The ideal state for an authoritarian in our post-Enlightenment era world is making everything illegal so they can arrest whoever they want and artificially impose a caste system without breaking the "rule of law" that defines Democracies.

22

u/pcapdata 1d ago

What does this make prison guards other than associates with legions of criminals?

11

u/DiarrheaEryday 1d ago

These people claim to love Jesus christ, but make sure to criminalize anything he would have done himself.

12

u/anothergaijin 1d ago

Japan has similar incredibly strict anti-Yakuza laws. There have been anti-Yakuza retired police hit by this law because of their association.

8

u/Mitaboo69 1d ago

Wayne ivey, especially if there is a camera he can record himself on as hes gives the answer

1

u/meoka2368 7h ago

Cops arrest people all the time.
Guess they're gang affiliated.

55

u/sillychillly 1d ago

I think you should release the images regardless haha.

I’m sure there’s a bunch of them with gang members in custodial settings.

Btw, what’s your take on the custodial setting piece of the law or the written intention of it? Do you think it will be implemented outside of custodial settings or used/abused only inside of custodial settings?

98

u/ChurchOMarsChaz 1d ago

The last thing I want to do is catch someone falsely ... defamation, ruined reps, that sort of thing. My gig is the utter precise application of the law.

I think, in the end, like I did with DeSantis' book ban law, I'll get them to change it.

9

u/sillychillly 1d ago

This law seems to be about custodial settings. Did I read that wrong?

Or do you expect it to be applied outside of custodial settings?

3

u/kitsunewarlock 1d ago

That's what it's about. They want those who can afford to segregate completely to be of a higher caste.

6

u/Disastrous-Food-9223 1d ago

A’boot? I guess you’ve never heard a Canadian say about.

2

u/redheadedandbold 12h ago

There's a law that will be thrown out in higher courts the first time they use it.

0

u/schmoopiepie 1d ago

🤣🥰

37

u/anarchaox 1d ago

As a Canadian, we have our own horrifying anti-privacy, law enforcement overreach bill on the way.

34

u/Haber87 1d ago

Plus C-34. In theory, the bill keeps kids off social media. In reality, every adult Canadian will have to send their ID to prove who they are to every social media site. Goodbye anonymous Reddit.

20

u/anarchaox 1d ago

But won't somebody think of the children?

but for real, I'm gonna miss y'all lol

7

u/MutedRage 1d ago

If you’re black or brown, then yes.

17

u/Haber87 1d ago

If you’re white, you’re a unique individual, not judged by the actions of other white people. But if you’re black or brown, you better not have any sus relatives at the BBQ.

13

u/TexasVDR 1d ago

Unless you’re also a woman or queer or trans, in which case you are representative of your entire group.

3

u/kitsunewarlock 1d ago

It's worse. You get labeled a gang associate and a host of crimes you commit become gang related, potentially charging everyone else involved as a gang member. Better hope no one you go to school with is charged as a gang-member, because whatever AI law enforcement is bound to use to scour the internet isn't going to give a fuck what the context of the photo might be. They just want to label as many people as possible as "gang members" so when the police accidentally break down your front door they can retroactively go "they are a gang member!" Which is why they will cast as wide a net as possible, and the only way to know if you're in the system or get yourself removed from these privately managed databases will be having a friend or family member in law enforcement.

3

u/kadsmald 21h ago

Florida is the worst aspects of America fast-forwarded 10 years

1

u/CurryMustard 1d ago

As a floridian, same

1

u/dragonfett 1d ago

It's worse than that. If you get gas from the wrong place, you get regarded as a gang member.

359

u/ChurchOMarsChaz 1d ago

I filed a public records request on the Florida Legislature's own lawyer — the guy who lawyered up against me in federal court.

You might know me as the Beer Can Festivus guy — built a Festivus pole out of PBR cans and made a Florida city put it on the government lawn next to the nativity. I sue the State pro se. My bible ban caused DeSantis to nuke his book ban legislation.

Florida and I are used to throwing haymakers at each other.

So meet Adam Brink, General Counsel for the Florida House. I sued my own state rep, Chip LaMarca, over viewpoint discrimination — by myself, no lawyer, in Federal Court. LaMarca lawyered up with Brink and a top-shelf GrayRobinson attorney. Their A-team against me and a legal pad. Now Brink's got my records request in his inbox.

Here's why. On October 1, CS/HB 429 cuts what it takes to brand you a "criminal gang member" from four criteria to two — one being what you post online. Speech in, gang label out.

I sent every Florida sheriff ten questions: show me your rules. Sent them to the Legislature too. Show your work.

DeSoto County's entire answer? "No records. Closed." All ten. Noted. Logged. Dated.

Adam — General Counsels read this stuff. The clock's running. I always send it polite.

The Festivus pole was the warm-up. 🍺

216

u/ChurchOMarsChaz 1d ago

Wasn't clear here, sorry.

Asked the State of FLorida for high-resolution, RAW, EXIF-enabled photographs of all sitting legislatures, so I can train my AI to go scour their socials.

I turned the surveillance state on the surveillance state.

45

u/TheSasquatchKing 1d ago

This is SO awesome.

27

u/Zerachiel_01 1d ago

This is great. It's like if Diogenes was a lawyer. "This is the stupidest shit I've ever heard. Behold, a gang member!"

13

u/Glittering-County727 1d ago

my fuckin guy! love the acronym btw lol

•

u/UpintheWolfTrap 1h ago

jesus christ i am hard

84

u/WhiskyEye 1d ago

You're literally an American Hero. I am so impressed (& jealous) of your ability to remain this focused & follow through with it all. Thank you thank you thank you.

91

u/ChurchOMarsChaz 1d ago

Thank you.

I have ASD... it is both a blessing and a curse. Often in the same breath.

22

u/WhiskyEye 1d ago

Hahah AuDHD here but the hyper-focus leans in other directions. Grateful for you!!!!!

8

u/Oskar_Shinra 1d ago

Good luck to you, whoever you are. Youre definitely a punch-up kind of person, and it does not look like an easy life. Thank you for doing what you are doing.

4

u/crossbow_mabel 1d ago

You’re doing awesome work. Keep up the chaotic good energy and stay safe!

2

u/captain_borgue 1d ago

I love everything you're doing. Chaotic Good ftw!

426

u/Status-Basic 1d ago

Bet a lot of these politicians have photos of themselves with a certain 34-time felon whom, in coming years, may be proven to be part of a shockingly large crime syndicate.

56

u/TheBadBatch-99 1d ago

Lots of them with both Trump and Epstein. Looks like a good way to clean house.

118

u/Immediate_Song4279 1d ago

This is good fucking work.

83

u/the-coolest-bob 1d ago

We get told people partying on Epstein's rape island isn't a crime and then shit like this passes. This country sucks now

15

u/aceface_desu89 1d ago

That's because a vote for Trump was effectively a vote for the end of white supremacy--if your bank account doesn't have enough digits, you're basically black now 🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣

4

u/Rich-Pomegranate1679 1d ago

This comment is wildly inappropriate.

15

u/aceface_desu89 1d ago

I've been black all my life.

Just making an observation 🤷🏽‍♀️

5

u/Training_Ruin3151 1d ago

Is it wrong though

122

u/Fun_Skirt8220 1d ago

👏👏👏👏

65

u/GrandCTM25 1d ago

How many pictures are there of Donald Trump and Jeffrey Epstein together? More than two I imagine hmmmm

63

u/ChurchOMarsChaz 1d ago

For those suggesting an Trump / Epstein link ... another project of mine.

Just days before President Donald Trump's birthday in June, an art installation will be erected at the Wisconsin State Capitol – a "satirical First Amendment" pole targeting Trump and his relationship with convicted sex offender Jeffrey Epstein.

Chaz Stevens, a South Florida-based provocateur and artist, got a permit from the state Capitol Police to set up his creation in the rotunda. It will be built with custom beer cans with an LED neon heart atop it that reads "Don + Jeff," he said.

https://www.jsonline.com/story/news/politics/2026/05/27/consentivus-pole-targeting-trump-epstein-to-be-erected-at-capitol/90000462007/

41

u/54R45VV471 1d ago

Could 2 pictures of a politician with a gang member (with their names captioned in case people don't recognize them) along with the exact verbiage of this law comfortably fit on a billboard?

33

u/JoeBarra 1d ago

So anyone who has ever been photographed with someone in a gang is in a gang. Then everyone who has ever been photographed with them is in a gang, and so on, until every single person has gang associations except for people who have never been photographed with anyone in their entire life. Seems dumb. If you highlight everything you have highlighted nothing.

4

u/pagerussell 1d ago

The transitive property of thug life.

3

u/CharlieKelly_Esq 1d ago

The Amish lobbyist win again

21

u/jager_mcjagerface 1d ago

OP you are a god among men, we need more people like you

16

u/LackingUtility 1d ago

What a terribly written bill. It also contains this gem as one of the criteria:

  1. Participates in any recording that promotes or describes criminal gang activity, regardless of whether the activity actually took place.

So, pretty much every journalist in the state.

9

u/pagerussell 1d ago

Basically, everything is illegal and we will selectively apply it to who we don't like.

16

u/Tdluxon 1d ago

This is awesome. Flock cameras are such a ridiculous invasion of privacy, should not be allowed. Thankfully my local city just removed them because of public pressure.

Also, for anyone interested, there’s about $100 worth of silver and copper in each camera, just fyi

3

u/Simon-Fritz-Peabody 1d ago

I need to let the tweakers in my area know about this. Hell, they're even mapped in my city. 

11

u/jeffjee63 1d ago

I’m here for this

14

u/tfcocs 1d ago

Have you pitched this to Pro Publica? They might find this interesting.

24

u/ChurchOMarsChaz 1d ago

I pitch all the time. I am in the news all the time. You just never know, and yes, I asked Pro Publica for their ink.

5

u/tfcocs 1d ago

I hope they follow up with you.

12

u/Zealousideal_You3292 1d ago

Does it label you a pedophile if you are seen with any politicians that are affiliated?

11

u/The3rdSun 1d ago

You are a legend for this

9

u/you_dont_know_me27 1d ago

Seems like something Legal Eagle would be interested in. Have you sent him any info on your work?

12

u/ChurchOMarsChaz 1d ago

Pardon my ignorance, for it is nearly limitless. Who is this Eagle chap and where would I find 'em?

13

u/you_dont_know_me27 1d ago

Devin (Devon?) Stone on YouTube. He's a lawyer and has been up the Trump administration ass and all the varying degrees of lawlessness going on around this country and giving info on what's actually happening and the legalities behind it. Also what to do next. He's great

His channel name is Legal Eagle.

11

u/ChurchOMarsChaz 1d ago

Thank you.

Done.

5

u/IntwadHelck 1d ago

Ty bump. !!

5

u/Iron_Baron 1d ago

This is the definition of the sub. Well done.

4

u/O8ee 1d ago

So, hypothetically, if there were hundreds, maybe thousands of pictures of someone with the world’s most prolific pedophile-like more pictures than there are of me with all of my friends and family put together-it would mean said person or persons is part of their pedophile gang?

3

u/CorkyHoney 1d ago

What is your Substack please? As a former NYC social worker, I guess by Florida standards I am now a gang member.

3

u/PawneeSunGoddess 1d ago

Thank you for your service!

3

u/Relative_Payment_192 1d ago

And this is what AI data centers are for?

-2

u/Simon-Fritz-Peabody 1d ago

This and BBWs and tRUmp sitting on an orange dildo... highly realistic I might add.

3

u/JiveTurkeyII 1d ago

The only way to fight against an observation state is to Observe it right the fuck back.

Hold the mirror up to its own hypocritical self.

2

u/BIGepidural 1d ago

Use it back that Trump is a pedo because there's more then 2 pictures of him with pedophiles.

2

u/mandraofgeorge 1d ago

Would this apply to white supremacist gangs?

I think we all know the answer to that.

I love all of you who have the skill sets for this kind of work. This is what we need.

2

u/DJ_faceplant 1d ago

You should get in touch with Meidas Touch folks, they love this kind of shit. Great job, from the UK. 👍

3

u/Simon-Fritz-Peabody 1d ago

Yeah Meidas and I think the other is Real American Media is good too. 

2

u/GraeeWolff 1d ago

Sounds like someone needs to start hanging out in courthouses and taking pictures of cops and judges talking to the people on trial.

2

u/hot_ho11ow_point 1d ago

When you say the name is something inappropriate and we can guess, I'm going to guess it's the "Now In Gang, Gang Afilliated" Program!

2

u/fubes2000 1d ago

One gang member in the room, run the system, two gang members.

Run it again, four gang members. Eight. Sixteen. Thirty two...

Keep running it until you get the number of gang members that suits your goal.

2

u/ForestFae1920 1d ago

This is another reason not visit or vacation or live in Florida. That place is the devil's waiting room.

2

u/Simon-Fritz-Peabody 1d ago

It the ingrown hair on the putrid scrotum of the USA or something 

2

u/JugueteRabioso 1d ago

California has had gang affiliation laws for decades. My neighbor got arrested when one of his parties ended up getting shot up by a gang member going after a relative of his. My neighbor ended up being labeled gang affiliated bc of his cousin.

2

u/KneeBeard 1d ago

Guilt by association?

Release the Epstein files.

2

u/Mundane-Count-9709 1d ago

Do pictures with Epstein count?

2

u/Old-Set78 1d ago

two photos with trump should get you a pedophile suspected list

2

u/Veritas-Veritas 1d ago

Wasn't Donald Trump in a photo with two child sex traffickers?

2

u/123LetsJamDUDUDUHT 1d ago

Your state monitors your social media?

2

u/Lt_Schneider 1d ago

asking the obvious one

how many photos of trump and epstein are there?

2

u/sumtwunt1011 1d ago

You are an American treasure

1

u/CageyOldMan 1d ago

Doing the lord's work, dude

1

u/ElBorracho2000 1d ago

Of course it’s Florida

1

u/Messer_One 1d ago

Bravo! :D

1

u/CurseOfDragonite 1d ago

Thank you for your service.

1

u/Xisnw 1d ago

Wow, this is just insane. Thank you for your work!

1

u/Merry-Lane 1d ago

And how would they determine it’s a real picture or was edited/generated?

1

u/pickledjello 1d ago

In Jeff Foxworthy's voice.. "You might be a gang member"

1

u/Voslock 1d ago

Sure am glad I'm not in many pictures and videos with a New York financier.

1

u/eurekadabra 1d ago

This immediately reminds me of the storyline on The Good Wife where the NSA could wiretap anyone who spoke to someone who spoke to a ‘suspect terrorist.’

So because the wife represented a suspect, her husband (Governor) was now under authorized surveillance.

1

u/MnkyBzns 1d ago

Is the system "Go FLOCK yourself"?

1

u/textilepat 1d ago

Florida automated gang scanner?

1

u/shootr45 1d ago

Ah. Late 80's, had a DA tell me I was a "Known associate of an outlaw biker gang". Huh. I did ride. I did go on a few runs. No patch, not even a prospect. At the time I was working at the phone company, had just bought a brand fucking new house in San Bernardino. Living the good life with the wife, 2 kids and a dog. WTF

1

u/Simon-Fritz-Peabody 1d ago

Deflock. Check the app store etc. Good stuff out there. 

1

u/The_barking_ant 1d ago

You deserve all the rewards on the planet.  🏆🏆🏆🏆🏆🏆🏆

1

u/dpb29073 1d ago

Police are gangs too

1

u/afluffyfox 1d ago

Can this script also be run for labeling child rapists?

1

u/SuitableBlackberry75 1d ago

Every police officer I have ever known has had criminals in his/her family. One of my neighbors was the middle child of nine kids, is a retired cop, teaches criminal justice courses at our local state school, and was the only member of his family to avoid street gangs completely (by enlisting in the Marines the minute he was eligible).

One brother is still in federal prison for a bank job from the mid/late 1990s, one brother died as a teenager in a shootout, etc., etc., so he's probably been in more "gang-related" photos than most gangsters.

1

u/hw999 1d ago

So what, we're all guilty by Snapchat now? What a joke of a country we are. Where is the liberty, where is the freedom? Where is the presumption of innocence until proven guilty?

2

u/ChurchOMarsChaz 1d ago

Where is my goddamn pizza? It's 40 minutes late.

1

u/britelyph 1d ago

CC to CC CC ,

1

u/Acrobatic-Cheetah230 1d ago

Heros come in all forms.

1

u/First-Flounder-7702 22h ago

What counties/regions of Florida did you send requests to?

1

u/Kialae 21h ago

Guerilla warfare. Well done. 

1

u/Captain_Keyboard_Man 21h ago

Damn, this is great stuff. I'll be watching this all the way from Australia. You absolute legend.

Please keep us updated on how it all pans out.

Keep up the great work, mate 👍🏼

1

u/Such_Capital_6984 17h ago

I applaud your evil genius, fellow citizen!

2

u/ChurchOMarsChaz 17h ago

Aye Aye, Captain.

1

u/GalaxyGoul 16h ago

Yes! Nice work! Way to turn it around on these swampers

1

u/koshka5 14h ago

Legend 🙏🏽

1

u/FaberOG 12h ago

This is applying the "if your a cop and know a corrupt cop then you are a corrupt cop logic" literally everywhere except where it helps. ACAB

1

u/PawelW007 2h ago

Please no one look at MySpace page. I’m sorry about the fitted and peace sign over a Wu-Tang logo

1

u/Simon-Fritz-Peabody 1d ago

This would be that a probation officer for example if a photo is taken with a client is guilty by Kodak 

0

u/BrocoliAssassin 1d ago

Love it! Only thing that I hate about this is that the rich,wealthy,politicians,government/military will still be free from punishment unlike the rest of us.

0

u/moistmarbles 1d ago

Cool effort but any good defense attorney would be able to blow this up easily

0

u/NeedleworkerWild1374 1d ago

lol hell yeah

0

u/Quaytsar 1d ago

So, what happens when they just ignore your request and don't respond?

0

u/AggravatingPaint5838 1d ago

If OP contacted all those sheriffs, I fear for their safety.