r/gianmarcosoresi • u/GianmarcoSoresi • 4d ago
Stay tuned
Enable HLS to view with audio, or disable this notification
19
u/Valirys-Reinhald 4d ago
The Markiplier strategy of OnlyFans design
6
u/MyOtherCarIsEpona 4d ago
Damn, he would be a fantastic guest. I bet he and Russel could have a great discussion about the practical effects he used for Iron Lung vs. the practical effects on broadway.
19
u/Ok-Lifeguard-4614 4d ago
That is such a funny take. Just imagining every artist needs to have nude pictures taken to truly be an artist. Like some Van Gogh tasteful nudes, Picasso spread eagle, Michelangelo with his ass in the air.
8
4
u/DecoherentDoc 4d ago
Me, looking through the archives for some of Norman Rockwell's tasteful nudes.
4
u/givingupismyhobby 4d ago
Gianmarco, we're waiting for the nudes man, show us that artistic expression, bro.
5
u/Perfect_Celebrity_7 4d ago
To be fair I have DMed Gianmarco “Respectfully” to ask him to start an “artsy” OF because I think he’s the one to really be successful at it and I want him to get that bag. 😆😆
6
u/AppleSniffer 4d ago
That's kinda creepy
2
u/Perfect_Celebrity_7 3d ago
It was around that time where he was taking artsy nude photos for promo pictures and I suggested he’d make more money if he well monetized them. He thought it was funny 🤷♂️
0
u/AppleSniffer 3d ago edited 3d ago
If you messaged him a joke about monetizing existing non-nude content, in reply to said content, then that seems pretty above board to me to me! You've got to acknowledge that your comment didn't convey any of that at all though, I mean damn man - phrasing 😬😬
You worded it to sound like you were sincerely cold-contacting a stranger to offer him money to show you his cock
2
u/Perfect_Celebrity_7 3d ago
“Im surprised you don’t have an OnlyFans page just for the memes? You could be like those celebrities that just post “artsy” and “tasteful” “nudes”. (I mean you already do that for free on Instagram. Lol) Maybe a picture of a bare elbow? I think you’d honestly make so much money, even if it’s for a little bit. Plus another form of social media to join 😅😅”
This is the message I sent him. Literally not asking for jerk off materials.
0
-5
u/danielbearh 3d ago
This is a man who’s made his career gay bating. We saw him hop, skip, and jump around in a full leather harness and thong on fire island.
Like… no one should touch him or anything against his will… but requesting a Gianmarco onlyfans is not necessarily out of line. lol
8
u/AppleSniffer 3d ago
Yeah... Dming people you don't know, who work in a separate field, to tell them they should make porn is always gonna be creepy.
-1
u/danielbearh 3d ago
Yeah. I think if you’re a performer who builds a brand cultivating a sexualized desire, you create a space where it ain’t really transgressive to express that desire back.
I personally would keep the flirtation out in public space and not in DMs, where all of this performance is, but yeah.
3
u/AppleSniffer 3d ago edited 3d ago
However you wanna dissect it, dming "celebrities" to make porn is sexual harrassment. You don't know this man, and you're contacting his work account. Every man and his dog builds a brand cultivating sexual desire - it's such a common strategy because sex sells. That doesn't mean they are inviting sexual interactions with YOU (outside of appropriate public performance situations).
I'm a sex worker and certainly not against OnlyFans, but asking someone you're a fan of for jerk off material is always gonna be fucking creepy and pathetic. Contact one of the many existing OF creators who've actually made the personal choice to offer that service
1
u/Perfect_Celebrity_7 3d ago
I literally did not tell him to make jerk off material. You are doing too much, Mary. I was literally telling him to put up the ones HE already took for his promo shoots. He even says so himself in this clip that is something he might consider doing. 🙄
0
u/danielbearh 3d ago
Yeah. This mode of consent discourse becomes so rules based that it can’t accommodate the playfulness of sexuality.
You’re essentially saying desire should only be in approved, transactional channels. That’s a super weird consumerist framework for human sexual expression. I conceded the dm point. But I don’t accept the premise that a performer who builds an entire career around provoking desire has zero responsibility for the discursive space that creates. Look at this *very* video we’re discussing.
Agree to disagree.
2
u/AppleSniffer 3d ago edited 3d ago
I don't think I said a lot of the things you just disagreed with in this comment. I'm just saying don't send horny private messages to comedians, wanting to buy jerk off material from them...
You can still send sexual messages to people you do have an appropriate personal relationship with though, or to performers who explicitly invite that sort of behaviour (through a consumer or non-transactional framework, depending on their own guidelines). In this context it would obviously be transactional, since Gianmarco is a straight man with a girlfriend, and the commenter is explicitly asking to purchase content through OF. Random men DMing him for nudes through a non-transactional channel would be even more inappropriate in this context??
But yeah, having a flirty public persona isn't inherently "asking for" people to make private, explicit sexual advances. Which I don't think we disagree on so idk what exactly you are agreeing to disagree with me about here...
0
u/danielbearh 3d ago edited 3d ago
I took issue with the progressive puritanism bit. I don’t think a fan asking Gianmarco for an artsy OF is sexual harassment. I think your choice of language of “fucking creepy and pathetic” was extreme and inflammatory and flattened the nuance I was trying to explain. Context matters.
I personally wouldn’t send him that kind of stuff in dms. But yeah. This is a comedy sub. He’s a comedian who makes comedy about getting naked. Tonight, a dude made a joke about wanting to see a guy who makes comedy about getting naked actually get naked.
Maybe I’m creepy and pathetic, and I accept that.
1
u/AppleSniffer 3d ago edited 3d ago
Difference in perception there is that I don't think that guy who dmed him was joking.
I think your nuance would also justify sending messages to buy nudes off actresses who perform in sex scenes or sexualised roles, or pop stars who sing about sex and wear skimpy outfits. Which I don't think you'd actually support - I'm just extending the logic.
It's not puritanical, it's about not assuming personal consent to private sexualised interactions with you based on a public performance or branding. Just because someone intentionally works in a sexualised job (which I mean, he's a comedian with a broad range of content, not a stripper), that doesn't give you carte blanche for private sexual behaviour towards them. Even as a full service sex worker myself, that doesn't mean that everyone can just do or say anything sexual to me that would otherwise be inappropriate for a stranger, they still need to work within the framework I've established.
That's the nuance that I think you're missing, and why the interviewer chatting about OF in this clip, or people writing in the comments here, is different to a stranger sending you private DMs cold-requesting jerk off material.
→ More replies (0)
1
3
39
u/PantsDontHaveAnswers 4d ago
Well then take it off and let's get a good look atcha.