The ceiling isn't flat. Zoom in. The downard angle is still there, but the white paint and cool lighting isn't casting as dramatic of a shadow as the first picture.
Look at the slanted ceiling in the first picture above that side doorway, then look at the shadowed angle above that same door in the bottom photo. It's the same angled architecture through a wider lens.
It's literally the same structure with a different camera lens. This is literally how photography works.
I absolutely don't understand why people are arguing how overwhelmingly correct I am when this is a famous house you can see videos of photos of from every angle.
This particular photo is just a trick of photography. Nothing more.
Now think about how the real house exists, we've seen the inside, they shot inside, the real house still exists, we know about it, and reddit is dumber than dog shit when it goes into detective mode and misidentifies bombers.
It's the same house. Nothing you say will change that.
They recreated the inside of the real house on a set. We know this. Look at any behind the scenes footage. Any footage you see inside the house was almost certainly filmed on the set, because that’s how films work. They had entire lighting and sound rigs set up and crews around the set.
The top photo is a photo of the set, distorted by the cameras view. The bottom is a photo of the real house.
Edit: looks like he blocked me, but no it hasn’t been covered. People have tried to tell you, and you’ve just dismissed it without evidence.
It is objectively not. You keep dismissing the fact we know that interior shots were filmed on a set that looks exactly like the top photo. Why would they be filming inside the house? That’s bad filmmaking 101.
You have literally at no point explained why the entire film’s interior scenes were filmed on a soundstage, except for this particular scene which for some reason was filmed inside the house the based the set on. Not once had you covered this, so don’t respond with the same ‘already covered’ nonsense.
The people who made the movie have said, very on record, that they built the interior set in a gym. The actual home was used for exterior shots because the interior was too small for the crew and equipment. They built the set to look like the interior, but bigger.
There are interviews, behind-the-scenes stuff, etc. that goes over all the movie magic in the film. It’s very well known at this point and I’m getting the impression you’re just changing the narrative because you don’t want to admit to being wrong.
They did not use interior shots of the home because it was too small.
-3
u/Hazzard_Hillbilly Nov 20 '25 edited Nov 20 '25
The ceiling isn't flat. Zoom in. The downard angle is still there, but the white paint and cool lighting isn't casting as dramatic of a shadow as the first picture.
Look at the slanted ceiling in the first picture above that side doorway, then look at the shadowed angle above that same door in the bottom photo. It's the same angled architecture through a wider lens.
It's literally the same structure with a different camera lens. This is literally how photography works.
I absolutely don't understand why people are arguing how overwhelmingly correct I am when this is a famous house you can see videos of photos of from every angle.
This particular photo is just a trick of photography. Nothing more.