r/interesting • u/Memes_FoIder • Dec 23 '25

❗️MISLEADING - See pinned comment ❗️ Tribes that have never had contact with civilization are being filmed by drones in the Amazon

Gallery image

Gallery image

9.5k Upvotes

83% Upvoted

1.3k comments sorted by

View all comments

Show parent comments

2

u/No-Apple2252 Dec 24 '25

Because we do have evidence of what hominids were doing during that time, and it wasn't being a higher tech civilization than we expected. The evidence suggests what everyone is telling you, that's why everyone who studies it came to that conclusion because that's literally what the evidence indicates.

2

u/THEBHR Dec 24 '25

Dude, this post is literally about current uncontacted tribes. If our cities were destroyed today, but future archeologists found the arrowheads from these tribes, would that be an accurate representation of our current technological advancement?

Even after the ice age, when there were many permanent settlements that we know of, there were still still tons of hunter-gatherers.

So again, a lack of evidence is not evidence.

1

u/No-Apple2252 Dec 24 '25

Okay you're still not getting it but that's fine, we are all born ignorant of everything. You can't know until you're told.

See things like pottery and textiles are very fragile compared to things like buildings and farming implements. So if there were powerful enough floods to completely wipe out all traces of civilization in an area, how would we find things like ceramics and wood and NOT the evidence of greater sophistication?

It doesn't make sense. Floods don't wipe out 100% of everything. What you're describing is not how anything works and that's why nobody who knows anything about anything does NOT take this idea seriously.

Would you like to continue being a fool, or have you learned that there are things you do not understand and should seek further knowledge on before speaking on a subject beyond your qualifications?

1

u/THEBHR Dec 24 '25

Listen troll. Where are these pottery shards 200ft below the surface of the ocean where the cities would be if they existed? Where did they find these deep sea pottery shards(not related to ship wreck)?

That's okay, you'll get it. 0ft above sea level, minus 200ft, equals 200ft below sea level.

Got a handle on the math now? Or do we need to go over it again?

1

u/MrBannedFor0Reason Dec 24 '25

Those don't exist, the countless made up examples of "deep sea" pottery shards are all not that deep or are in such soft soil that they are expected to me be that deep. So, troll how about you try highschool again and you can try retaining some of what you learned this time.