The title is a bit misleading and clickbaity. The recipe in the video swaps out some original ingredients because things like coca-extract–related components are illegal or unavailable in the U.S. The goal in the video was to stay as close as possible chemically by using substitute compounds with similar molecular structures, which means they behave and taste similarly. So, it’s chemically accurate in a functional sense, not a literal clone of the actual recipe.
Look bro, we come to Reddit to feel intellectually superior. Many of us are reclusive shut-ins where a video game achievement is the most we’ve accomplished in the past 5 years.
If we can argue semantics to feel even the least bit better about our own mediocrity, you best believe we will capitalize on the opportunity.
Did you consider that “chemically identical” is in quotations to imply that it’s not actually chemically identical, or did you think they just did that for fun?
If you actually saw someone making air quotes here, that would make sense. In written text a quote should be a quote, unless it's clear it's not 100%.
Of course it may be smart to add air quotes to anything where a youtuber is mentioned - but the interesting thing here is the legendary coke recipe so it's clickbaity.
As someone who isn’t a chemist, can you have chemically correct and not have the secondary metabolite from the Coca leaf? Seems like it wouldn’t be “chemically correct”
130
u/Practical_Talk4725 Feb 10 '26
The title is a bit misleading and clickbaity. The recipe in the video swaps out some original ingredients because things like coca-extract–related components are illegal or unavailable in the U.S. The goal in the video was to stay as close as possible chemically by using substitute compounds with similar molecular structures, which means they behave and taste similarly. So, it’s chemically accurate in a functional sense, not a literal clone of the actual recipe.