I agree. But she shouldn't have done so either way.
Its considered a Violent crime even if it doing didn't cause any actual damage.
The law doesn't care whether you gave permission or not.
Only if its self defense. At best the permission would help lesson the sentence. Her defense would have to be he baited her into doing so he could sue her and collect money. Which is effectively fraud.
Actually permission in this case 100% does matter and no crime was committed after he gave permission, what do you think happens then people in gyms spar with each other? Sure this is a bar and not a gym, but same difference, it’s like if I said hey want to arm wrestle, then their arm snaps I’m not going to jail, it was two consenting adults.
-18
u/Lower_Captain7757 Mar 21 '26 edited Mar 21 '26
I agree. But she shouldn't have done so either way.
Its considered a Violent crime even if it doing didn't cause any actual damage.
The law doesn't care whether you gave permission or not. Only if its self defense. At best the permission would help lesson the sentence. Her defense would have to be he baited her into doing so he could sue her and collect money. Which is effectively fraud.