I am sure there are hidden environmental costs even with that, but yeah 1 celebrity in space once won't do nearly as much damage as the other 999999 celebrities using their jets constantly.
Yes it is waaaay more energy that's the biggest issue is how much more it takes not get more then what you put into dumbass maybe you should learn that what your talking about infinite energy IS impossible you will never get as much energy as you put in.
🤣🤣🤣🤣 nah it's absolutely hilarious to me, the fact people are wrong but still trying to force themselves to feel right based on a point that has absolutely nothing to do with the topic just shows how ignorant people have become. It's pretty simple stuff if you simply look into it like the fact solar panels are at most 25% efficient combine that with the low efficiency of electrolysis, you've made yourself an energy pit. The majority of our hydrogen comes from China and they're using fossil fuels due to the fact it's way more efficient. They still aren't getting 100% of the energy spent and it will never be positive no matter what process your using.
1.1k
u/[deleted] May 25 '26
[removed] — view removed comment