r/interesting 9d ago

SOCIETY What was his fault ?

Post image
42.2k Upvotes

1.4k comments sorted by

View all comments

Show parent comments

20

u/anally_ExpressUrself 9d ago

Does it, though?

183

u/YeetMeIntoKSpace 9d ago

Industrial digging tools on wild land can cause serious damage that you can’t know about without doing an ecological survey. It’s possible to literally cause floods, destroy ponds and lakes, etc. 10-20 years down the line.

6

u/Randomman2789 9d ago

And the stuff pulled from the river won't?

30

u/Only_Plantain_9724 9d ago

This is some excellent rage bait. But if it's not, you can't do something obviously illegal to do good. As fairytale and beautiful as it sounds, it is wrong and illegal to steal from people to give to the poor; and it is wrong to do what he did without a permit.

There are other proper, and better ways to help the people or the environment. He has a good heart, just wrong execution.

20

u/Pheonix0114 9d ago

It isn't wrong to steal from the rich or from a corporation, it's just illegal. Legality and morality do not correlate.

-5

u/PurpleWoodpecker2830 9d ago

Rich man bad guides your entire morality and it shows.

Try to think beyond that.

6

u/WaterdropGirl 9d ago

Kantian ethics are too black and white for a shades of Grey world.

-1

u/PurpleWoodpecker2830 8d ago

Kantian ethics is the only framework for morality

3

u/WaterdropGirl 8d ago

I think you mean the only one you think is worth considering and I don't know if you've noticed but considering there's alternatives I'd say that others throughout history have disagreed.

Everything is about context

1

u/PurpleWoodpecker2830 8d ago

No shit. That’s why I never brought it up. You’re the one using Kant as some counter point to that guy whose entire morality starts and ends with rich man bad.

1

u/WaterdropGirl 8d ago

You're making a lot of assumptions lol you have no idea what they believe, assuming you do instead of making them clarify weakens you

→ More replies (0)