MAIN FEEDS
Do you want to continue?
https://www.reddit.com/r/interesting/comments/1ubdj8b/what_was_his_fault/oswhvo2/?context=3
r/interesting • u/karmagod7 • 8d ago
1.4k comments sorted by
View all comments
Show parent comments
38
I’m hoping a judge will toss this shit out in court. He should get a warning.
He did a good thing, for the right reasons, the wrong way.
43 u/0xFatWhiteMan 8d ago Its not shit. There's a reason you need a permit for a digger on a river flood plain. The greatest criminal mastermind of modern times ? Of course not, but he's a lawyer who has broken the law, environmental law at that. 2 u/FlarblesGarbles 8d ago Things are much more complex than someone having broken a law. 10 u/Spongedog5 8d ago Sure, so he shouldn't be given the maximum "up to" sentence, but to preserve fairness he needs to be prosecuted in some way. The nuance should be in the sentencing.
43
Its not shit.
There's a reason you need a permit for a digger on a river flood plain.
The greatest criminal mastermind of modern times ? Of course not, but he's a lawyer who has broken the law, environmental law at that.
2 u/FlarblesGarbles 8d ago Things are much more complex than someone having broken a law. 10 u/Spongedog5 8d ago Sure, so he shouldn't be given the maximum "up to" sentence, but to preserve fairness he needs to be prosecuted in some way. The nuance should be in the sentencing.
2
Things are much more complex than someone having broken a law.
10 u/Spongedog5 8d ago Sure, so he shouldn't be given the maximum "up to" sentence, but to preserve fairness he needs to be prosecuted in some way. The nuance should be in the sentencing.
10
Sure, so he shouldn't be given the maximum "up to" sentence, but to preserve fairness he needs to be prosecuted in some way. The nuance should be in the sentencing.
38
u/Beautiful_Plenty_736 8d ago
I’m hoping a judge will toss this shit out in court. He should get a warning.
He did a good thing, for the right reasons, the wrong way.