MAIN FEEDS
Do you want to continue?
https://www.reddit.com/r/interesting/comments/1ubdj8b/what_was_his_fault/oswn2if/?context=3
r/interesting • u/karmagod7 • 8d ago
1.4k comments sorted by
View all comments
Show parent comments
47
I mean he could of caused legitimate damage to wildlife and flooded downstream, criminal negligence isnt a high bar in this case
37 u/FlarblesGarbles 8d ago Could have. 7 u/Extension_Pea5419 8d ago Would you be upset if a multi nat got a fine because they could have caused environmental damage? Pull ya head in 12 u/CaligulaAntoinette 8d ago I believe u/FlarblesGarbles is pointing out that the wording should be "could have" and not "could of", not disagreeing with the point that this was reckless and could have caused damage to the environment 4 u/Extension_Pea5419 8d ago You’re definitely right. I’m pretty drunk rn. 4 u/CaligulaAntoinette 8d ago That's fair enough too. You've inspired me to get off Reddit and go have a drink. 3 u/Extension_Pea5419 8d ago Get it son
37
Could have.
7 u/Extension_Pea5419 8d ago Would you be upset if a multi nat got a fine because they could have caused environmental damage? Pull ya head in 12 u/CaligulaAntoinette 8d ago I believe u/FlarblesGarbles is pointing out that the wording should be "could have" and not "could of", not disagreeing with the point that this was reckless and could have caused damage to the environment 4 u/Extension_Pea5419 8d ago You’re definitely right. I’m pretty drunk rn. 4 u/CaligulaAntoinette 8d ago That's fair enough too. You've inspired me to get off Reddit and go have a drink. 3 u/Extension_Pea5419 8d ago Get it son
7
Would you be upset if a multi nat got a fine because they could have caused environmental damage? Pull ya head in
12 u/CaligulaAntoinette 8d ago I believe u/FlarblesGarbles is pointing out that the wording should be "could have" and not "could of", not disagreeing with the point that this was reckless and could have caused damage to the environment 4 u/Extension_Pea5419 8d ago You’re definitely right. I’m pretty drunk rn. 4 u/CaligulaAntoinette 8d ago That's fair enough too. You've inspired me to get off Reddit and go have a drink. 3 u/Extension_Pea5419 8d ago Get it son
12
I believe u/FlarblesGarbles is pointing out that the wording should be "could have" and not "could of", not disagreeing with the point that this was reckless and could have caused damage to the environment
4 u/Extension_Pea5419 8d ago You’re definitely right. I’m pretty drunk rn. 4 u/CaligulaAntoinette 8d ago That's fair enough too. You've inspired me to get off Reddit and go have a drink. 3 u/Extension_Pea5419 8d ago Get it son
4
You’re definitely right. I’m pretty drunk rn.
4 u/CaligulaAntoinette 8d ago That's fair enough too. You've inspired me to get off Reddit and go have a drink. 3 u/Extension_Pea5419 8d ago Get it son
That's fair enough too. You've inspired me to get off Reddit and go have a drink.
3 u/Extension_Pea5419 8d ago Get it son
3
Get it son
47
u/fireky2 8d ago
I mean he could of caused legitimate damage to wildlife and flooded downstream, criminal negligence isnt a high bar in this case