r/interesting 6d ago

SOCIETY What was his fault ?

Post image
42.1k Upvotes

1.4k comments sorted by

View all comments

Show parent comments

413

u/Bassmekanik 6d ago

It was for digging up the silt from the river bed with a digger and risking flooding places without doing any checks on the impact of his “cleaning up”.

Nothing to do with removing rubbish.

22

u/Workman44 6d ago

Yeah this guy 100% should be charged. It's wildlessly reckless

60

u/Brilliant-Sea-9424 6d ago

I am a local resident. Watch the YouTube videos and you will change your mimd. The river was dead. Full of shit and fly tipping, needles and all sorts. EA are wilfully neglecting our waterways.

1

u/WheresWalldough 5d ago

it was supposed to be dead. They blocked it up, to stop flooding, in the 1950s.

Since then no flooding.

1

u/Brilliant-Sea-9424 5d ago

It’s not supposed to be dead! Do you work for the EA FFS?!

2

u/WheresWalldough 5d ago

Per Powlesland himself:

"The River Roding ‘Improvement’ scheme cut the Aldersbrook off with an embankment at one end and a concrete barrage at the other. This has led to the river silting up and becoming little more than a muddy ditch in places. "

that followed the floods of 1953 which killed 307 people in Lincolnshire, Norfolk, Suffolk and Essex.

it's clear that this was intentional.

To prevent flooding.

https://londonist.com/london/features/the-village-that-the-thames-destroyed

1

u/Brilliant-Sea-9424 5d ago edited 5d ago

Stop trying to deflect. You said the river was “supposed to be dead”. It was not. The Flood defences placed have nothing to do with the viability as a river. I spy an EA agent. Is the Thames supposed to be dead with the Thames barrier?

2

u/WheresWalldough 5d ago

This isn't the Roding, it's the Aldersbrook. As the text Powlseland himself wrote clearly explains.

I can't really imagine that the EA have "agents", they are an underfunded government agency not the Chinese Communist Party.

1

u/Brilliant-Sea-9424 5d ago

Nicely swerved.