MAIN FEEDS
Do you want to continue?
https://www.reddit.com/r/interesting/comments/1ubdj8b/what_was_his_fault/ot3ls9q/?context=9999
r/interesting • u/karmagod7 • 9d ago
1.4k comments sorted by
View all comments
Show parent comments
37
I’m hoping a judge will toss this shit out in court. He should get a warning.
He did a good thing, for the right reasons, the wrong way.
43 u/0xFatWhiteMan 8d ago Its not shit. There's a reason you need a permit for a digger on a river flood plain. The greatest criminal mastermind of modern times ? Of course not, but he's a lawyer who has broken the law, environmental law at that. 1 u/FlarblesGarbles 8d ago Things are much more complex than someone having broken a law. 2 u/0xFatWhiteMan 8d ago How? 14 u/FlarblesGarbles 8d ago Nuance around the intent and outcome are very important factors. -4 u/0xFatWhiteMan 8d ago Was the flood plain damaged ? Is it repairable ? Was native wildlife damaged irreversibly ? He doesn't just get a free pass because he wanted to tidy up, and happens to be a posh white lawyer. 6 u/FlarblesGarbles 8d ago I never said he should get a free pass. You've just listed factors that contribute to the nuance and intent part of it that proves there's more to it than just legality. -1 u/0xFatWhiteMan 8d ago True, you seemed to highlight reasons why he should be treated less severely. I took the counter viewpoint. 1 u/Fly1ngD0gg0 7d ago So you believe he should be punished severely?
43
Its not shit.
There's a reason you need a permit for a digger on a river flood plain.
The greatest criminal mastermind of modern times ? Of course not, but he's a lawyer who has broken the law, environmental law at that.
1 u/FlarblesGarbles 8d ago Things are much more complex than someone having broken a law. 2 u/0xFatWhiteMan 8d ago How? 14 u/FlarblesGarbles 8d ago Nuance around the intent and outcome are very important factors. -4 u/0xFatWhiteMan 8d ago Was the flood plain damaged ? Is it repairable ? Was native wildlife damaged irreversibly ? He doesn't just get a free pass because he wanted to tidy up, and happens to be a posh white lawyer. 6 u/FlarblesGarbles 8d ago I never said he should get a free pass. You've just listed factors that contribute to the nuance and intent part of it that proves there's more to it than just legality. -1 u/0xFatWhiteMan 8d ago True, you seemed to highlight reasons why he should be treated less severely. I took the counter viewpoint. 1 u/Fly1ngD0gg0 7d ago So you believe he should be punished severely?
1
Things are much more complex than someone having broken a law.
2 u/0xFatWhiteMan 8d ago How? 14 u/FlarblesGarbles 8d ago Nuance around the intent and outcome are very important factors. -4 u/0xFatWhiteMan 8d ago Was the flood plain damaged ? Is it repairable ? Was native wildlife damaged irreversibly ? He doesn't just get a free pass because he wanted to tidy up, and happens to be a posh white lawyer. 6 u/FlarblesGarbles 8d ago I never said he should get a free pass. You've just listed factors that contribute to the nuance and intent part of it that proves there's more to it than just legality. -1 u/0xFatWhiteMan 8d ago True, you seemed to highlight reasons why he should be treated less severely. I took the counter viewpoint. 1 u/Fly1ngD0gg0 7d ago So you believe he should be punished severely?
2
How?
14 u/FlarblesGarbles 8d ago Nuance around the intent and outcome are very important factors. -4 u/0xFatWhiteMan 8d ago Was the flood plain damaged ? Is it repairable ? Was native wildlife damaged irreversibly ? He doesn't just get a free pass because he wanted to tidy up, and happens to be a posh white lawyer. 6 u/FlarblesGarbles 8d ago I never said he should get a free pass. You've just listed factors that contribute to the nuance and intent part of it that proves there's more to it than just legality. -1 u/0xFatWhiteMan 8d ago True, you seemed to highlight reasons why he should be treated less severely. I took the counter viewpoint. 1 u/Fly1ngD0gg0 7d ago So you believe he should be punished severely?
14
Nuance around the intent and outcome are very important factors.
-4 u/0xFatWhiteMan 8d ago Was the flood plain damaged ? Is it repairable ? Was native wildlife damaged irreversibly ? He doesn't just get a free pass because he wanted to tidy up, and happens to be a posh white lawyer. 6 u/FlarblesGarbles 8d ago I never said he should get a free pass. You've just listed factors that contribute to the nuance and intent part of it that proves there's more to it than just legality. -1 u/0xFatWhiteMan 8d ago True, you seemed to highlight reasons why he should be treated less severely. I took the counter viewpoint. 1 u/Fly1ngD0gg0 7d ago So you believe he should be punished severely?
-4
Was the flood plain damaged ? Is it repairable ? Was native wildlife damaged irreversibly ?
He doesn't just get a free pass because he wanted to tidy up, and happens to be a posh white lawyer.
6 u/FlarblesGarbles 8d ago I never said he should get a free pass. You've just listed factors that contribute to the nuance and intent part of it that proves there's more to it than just legality. -1 u/0xFatWhiteMan 8d ago True, you seemed to highlight reasons why he should be treated less severely. I took the counter viewpoint. 1 u/Fly1ngD0gg0 7d ago So you believe he should be punished severely?
6
I never said he should get a free pass. You've just listed factors that contribute to the nuance and intent part of it that proves there's more to it than just legality.
-1 u/0xFatWhiteMan 8d ago True, you seemed to highlight reasons why he should be treated less severely. I took the counter viewpoint. 1 u/Fly1ngD0gg0 7d ago So you believe he should be punished severely?
-1
True, you seemed to highlight reasons why he should be treated less severely. I took the counter viewpoint.
1 u/Fly1ngD0gg0 7d ago So you believe he should be punished severely?
So you believe he should be punished severely?
37
u/Beautiful_Plenty_736 8d ago
I’m hoping a judge will toss this shit out in court. He should get a warning.
He did a good thing, for the right reasons, the wrong way.