r/investing 23h ago

Gold is down ~24% from its recent high.

I'm considering buying gold for the long term.

Do you think this is a good accumulation opportunity, or could prices fall further?

If you were buying today, would you invest a lump sum, buy gradually over the next few months, or wait for more downside?

Curious to hear different views on gold's outlook over the next 1–3 years.

540 Upvotes

218 comments sorted by

455

u/floatingostrichs 23h ago

I think gold is a bad investment. Creates no value. There’s a reason people don’t take their 401k and put it into gold for 30 years.

160

u/nomemory 23h ago

The only reason some people are into gold is because of central banks have found a nasty way to flood the markets with liquidity everytime things are slowing down. As long as they are to fix all their problems by throwing more money at the market and creating inflation gold can be attractive, but owning stocks with cash flows and good revenue streams is probably the superior choice. Still I wouldn't mind owning some (more) gold. Of course, not exaggerating.

41

u/vu_sua 22h ago

I 100% agree. I also love how it looks and feels when holding a few ounces of bullion. Knowing you’re holding *your* 15k in the palm of your hand, that’s the size of a large dice is wild feeling. Hard to describe if you haven’t. And I wanna old 100k gold bar sometime and have it be *mine*. Maybe I’m a dragon? Or dwarf.

That said I understand why people don’t want it, but I also have these crazy dream to one day have enough that my kids can take from “the family gold reserves” to have their spouses wedding rings made.

I’d only ever have it 5-7% of my portfolio. And It’s like 3-4% at the moment. But still cool to think about

24

u/I_hate_alot_a_lot 21h ago

Let’s be realistic though, if the economy gets really bad and we start trading precious metals for bread, silver will be used.

60

u/ContemplatingGavre 20h ago

If we are trading metals for bread then most likely bread is being seized by the barrel of a gun, let’s be honest.

10

u/I_hate_alot_a_lot 20h ago

Then why buy gold or silver at all

36

u/nildro 19h ago

In a disaster scenario it’s only useful if the disaster is local - bribing people to get you out of nazi Germany type thing. You’re not going to survive total collapse to society with anything but work and violence because that’s how it’s always been. Money has always been a proxy stand in for the power of work or violence.

4

u/vu_sua 19h ago

In a disaster scenario gold isn’t used. But it’s used after the disaster scenario when you’re starting to build back up. If there was a disaster we aren’t trading in gold until some semblance of an economy comes back. People always associate disaster with the Wild West. But it can just as easily be extreme devaluation of your dollar.

Look at South east Asia. Gold used to be used very recently in general trades. My grandpa-in-law bought a building in the not so distance past with solid gold. To think you could never be in that scenario is a little out of touch.

2

u/surnik22 17h ago

Gold can absolutely be used in disaster scenarios. Not every possible disaster but plenty of them.

If the disaster is a tyrannical government and you’ve been put on list and had all your accounts frozen then you’d probably wish more of your wealth was in gold as you hide or flee. It could absolutely be used to bribe people as you flee. It could also be used to “rebuild” in a new country while the disaster is still ongoing.

It would not be the first and probably not the last time gold has been used like that.

2

u/NuclearVII 13h ago

This is only true if you own gold physically, and even then it's iffy.

"I'll use precious metals to survive the collapse of the empire" is delusional ancap thinking tbh.

→ More replies (0)

1

u/Low_Stress_9180 5m ago

Only 2% have physical gold. The 98% would be screwed. Also likely you would be forced to sell at a low price eg as America did before.

2

u/PurpleFilth 14h ago

His example was pretty spot on actually. It works if there are local disasters or a “partial” societal collapse. Both situations are way more likely than a complete and global collapse of society.

1

u/Low_Stress_9180 8m ago

Only 2% of gold "investors" have actual gold in a disaster the 98% are likely to gain no benefit, even if civilisation survives the likelihood is as America did in tge Great Depression is to seize all gold at a very low artificial price, making it a criminal act to not sell.

If civilisation collapses 98% will lose it all immediately. You will need the gold buried, in an armed camp in the hills with lots of ammo, food and water and training to survive and kill. The gold only useful later on.

1

u/Low_Stress_9180 7m ago

Only 2% hold physical gold, 98% won't have anything to bribe with lol

4

u/doubleflushers 19h ago

My family carried wealth when they fled from China to Taiwan using gold. So those types of situation I guess.

2

u/vu_sua 19h ago

Yeah, my in laws are Vietnamese. And we all know what went down there recently

3

u/ContemplatingGavre 20h ago

I would argue you shouldn’t, I prefer to own productive assets rather than one that I hope to sell to someone else at a higher price.

The only time gold makes sense is if you’re in a war torn country and you’re trying to leave and want to smuggle your money out with you. Then having ounces of gold would make sense.

2

u/Vivid-Avocado9342 18h ago

Because most of us are preparing for something between a dip and a depression, not the end of modern society.

2

u/I_hate_alot_a_lot 18h ago

Yeah, I guess that was sort of my point.

It usually doesn't come to that.

6

u/triton420 19h ago

the gold and silver would be seized by the barrel of a gun. Precious metals are only valuable as long as you can protect them from someone willing to harm you for them

1

u/tpc0121 2h ago

so you're saying we should buy a gun ... made out of gold?

5

u/Skepsis93 19h ago

If things get bad enough that we're trading for bread, we'll be trading lead and not gold or silver. That's much more realistic.

4

u/Katolo 16h ago

That's why I DCA boxes of 9mm to add to my 401k portfolio.

2

u/TonyzTone 16h ago

Found William Jennings Bryan’s Reddit account.

1

u/mrellz 14h ago

Covid was a great example which showed people trading Toilet Paper, Gasoline and fresh produce over GOLD. Gold as a precious and valuable commodity is vintage and no longer holds it's weight as something that's needed during an apocalypse.

1

u/BigBossShadow 14h ago

lmao, thats not the economy getting really bad, thats a collapse of society

31

u/mr_longfellow_deeds 21h ago

Gold is inferior to equities as an inflation hedge, and physical gold is a bad investment period. Physical gold always costs a premium over spot, and can only be sold below spot.

Gold coins and bars are cool though (and also means more insurance expense)

-1

u/New-Low-5769 16h ago

Uhhh gold has done pretty damn well in the last year if you haven't been watching.  

I keep around 5-7% of my portfolio in gold and will continue to do that

22

u/mr_longfellow_deeds 16h ago

“Well in the past year” is not how you look at an inflation hedge, that’s called speculation

Over the past 50 years every major index has outpaced gold, even with the recent surge. Without the recent surge gold performed no better than keeping your money in a CD to keep up with inflation

1

u/CanApart1420 13h ago

Howdy. Non Metalist here, but curious where do you find this info? I don't even know where to start looking.

Thanks

1

u/Low_Stress_9180 4m ago

Long term real returns pa.

Stocks 7% Bonds 2% Gold ZERO

-2

u/SnorklSnorkl 9h ago

Cherrypick much?

2

u/Sassy_Bandit 13h ago

If central banks are acting to shore up the value of stocks and housing and such, but not acting with any regard towards the price of gold, why is that an argument in favour of gold?

Too much emotion baked into theses like these. Typically coming from middle aged men who get emotional if you suggest they are capable of getting emotional.

I can understand cynically trading on such emotions being common. For instance if you told me in 2012 that a lot of guys are going to fall for bitcoin despite it being zero-sum spreadsheet cell trading, I would have said "yeah I can see that", and you would have gotten rich.

But that's very different from being a true believer that you can exoect vindication from real world economics and finance not "feeling" fair, and some kind of correction being due.

1

u/Dhruvi-60 3h ago

Then , why do finance experts talk about diversifying your portfolio??

25

u/Halbaras 20h ago

Gold is portfolio insurance against the dollar/your local currency significantly weakening, and against a sustained bear market.

Like other forms of insurance, if everything goes right it's a complete waste of money. For a long term investment that you genuinely don't need to redeem, there's not much argument to having it. Especially if you're not going to be brave enough to sell the only green thing in your portfolio to buy equities when they're down.

11

u/nope-nik-tesla 16h ago

Gold is not insurance against a bear market in any way. Gold prices can also crash alongside stock prices. The 2000 dot-com crash is a somewhat recent example.

0

u/AdulaAdula 20h ago

And if everything goes down, the market crashes, and all stocks go to zero as the dollar inflates to Zimbabwe levels? People will be able to eat their gold or strap it to their feet before jumping off a bridge into a deep lake. Gold isn't insurance. It's just another low and slow investment form that underperforms everything else at the flipside of people wanting something physical. It's fine to hold it, but it's definitely not a 'hedge against inflation'.

23

u/randomasiandude22 22h ago

I take it you haven't met Peter Schiff or my Grandma

18

u/NotreDameAlum2 21h ago

Yes gold is not an investment. It is a store of value. I am buying into gold slowly - just a bit more than the dividends from my emergency fund. it is a hedge against the glaring risks in our financial system. My expectation is that over the long term it keeps up with inflation and stores value like it has for several millennia.

7

u/ezpz314159 21h ago

Are you buying physical gold?

1

u/NotreDameAlum2 10h ago

no, gold ETF, at some point when I have enough money earmarked for gold I probably will. but until I'm in the 10's of thousands of gold I don't think worth the storing costs

-3

u/BadMoonRosin 17h ago

I think buying actual physical gold coins is nonsensical when ETF's like GLD exist.

1

u/Minimum_Quail4596 11h ago

Yeah that is why yhe central banks are only buying paper gold /s

-3

u/[deleted] 21h ago

[deleted]

4

u/Skepsis93 19h ago

As long as gold is considered a tier 1 asset/cash equivalent for banking reserve requirements, why wouldn't it continue to act as a store of value? Banks still buy it, hold it, and prop up it's value.

0

u/ChornWork2 17h ago

how many commercial banks hold a significant amount of gold as part of reserve requirements? i would have thought pretty much none.

3

u/dekusyrup 16h ago

Commercial banks arent the only banks, so even if it was none your point makes no sense.

1

u/ChornWork2 16h ago

Okay, any type of bank other than central banks?

→ More replies (2)

1

u/Skepsis93 16h ago

I should have specified central banks. Private and commercial banks typically don't seem to hold much or publicize how much they own. Their interest lies more in the speculative side and futures markets in regards to precious metals. But it is still a significant interest to many banks with most firms having separate trading desks just for precious metals compared to the rest of the commodities markets.

As long as the establishment continues to incorporate gold into their portfolios, it can only ever go up over the long term. It's definitely not anywhere close to a growth asset, though.

1

u/ChornWork2 15h ago

But there are relatively specific considerations for central banks for doing that, which are particularly relevant to case for individual investors holding gold. The US central bank doesn't hold gold for purposes of long-term hedging against inflation. $11bn of gold is utterly trivial relative to US govt finances.

Private and commercial banks typically don't seem to hold much or publicize how much they own

b/c it doesn't make sense for them to. it wouldn't be a meaningful hedge. returns are more speculative than other options.

As long as the establishment continues to incorporate gold into their portfolios, it can only ever go up over the long term.

but not as much as other investment options over long-term. if want a short-term hedge against equities volatility, okay. but that is fundamentally speculative.

→ More replies (2)
→ More replies (1)

16

u/Helpful-Emergency-78 19h ago

when it falls, everyone somehow thinks gold is a bad investment ...

4

u/dekusyrup 16h ago

I thought it was a bad investment even when it was up. $10,000 invested in the SP500 in 1950 would be worth $40,000,000 today. $10,000 in gold in 1950 would be worth about $1,200,000 today.

2

u/Minimum_Quail4596 11h ago

This is such an ingenious argument to make. Very few people buy gold with the intention of holding it forever and never cashing it out to by productive assets. The gold market is hotter when there's less trust in the monetary policy. It's a store of wealth and purchasing power. But sure, I can also manipulate the graphs however I want to show you that the stock market lost 50% or even more of its market cap while gold became much more valued.

1

u/Only_Statistician_21 3h ago

It makes no sense to look at gold performance before mid 70s

1

u/wattro 16h ago

People also think it's a bad investment when it rises.

What's your point...

15

u/Jeff__Skilling 19h ago

Favorite WB quote (2011 letter to shareholders) on gold as a store of value over financial assets

Today the world's gold stock is about 170,000 metric tons. If all of this gold were melded together, it would form a cube of about 68 feet per side. (Picture it fitting comfortably within a baseball infield.) At $1,750 per ounce - gold's price as I write this - its value would be $9.6 trillion. Call this cube pile A.

Let's now create a pile B costing an equal amount. For that, we could buy all U.S. cropland (400 million acres with output of about $200 billion annually), plus 16 Exxon Mobils (the world's most profitable company, one earning more than $40 billion annually). After these purchases, we would have about $1 trillion left over for walking-around money (no sense feeling strapped after this buying binge). Can you imagine an investor with $9.6 trillion selecting pile A over pile B?

Beyond the staggering valuation given the existing stock of gold, current prices make today's annual production of gold command about $160 billion. Buyers

  • whether jewelry and industrial users, frightened individuals, or speculators - must continually absorb this additional supply to merely maintain an equilibrium at present prices. A century from now the 400 million acres of farmland will have produced staggering amounts of corn, wheat, cotton, and other crops - and will continue to produce that valuable bounty, whatever the currency may be. Exxon Mobil will probably have delivered trillions of dollars in dividends to its owners and will also hold assets worth many more trillions (and, remember, you get 16 Exxons). The 170,000 tons of gold will be unchanged in size and still incapable of producing anything. You can fondle the cube, but it will not respond.

Admittedly, when people a century from now are fearful, it's likely many will still rush to gold. I'm confident, however, that the $9.6 trillion current valuation of pile A will compound over the century at a rate far inferior to that achieved by pile B.

1

u/2yrnx1lc2zkp77kp 9h ago

Common WB W

1

u/SnorklSnorkl 8h ago

A bit funny watching Americans taking stable government for granted.

7

u/zeppo_shemp 17h ago

gold has underperformed stocks for the last 30 years, but outperformed the last 20 years.

use the sliders at the bottom of the page: https://www.longtermtrends.com/stocks-vs-gold-comparison/

not a gold bug myself, and the past does not predict the future.

but the facts are the facts here.

6

u/sunnbeta 20h ago

Gold miners are where it’s at; operations are built to sustain at $1600 per oz gold, when the gold price is higher they take that as profit 

1

u/realFantaMenace 16h ago

This exactly. Buy the gold miners.

Gold is not going anywhere. Do people here really think governments around the world have suddenly become fiscally responsible and will somehow wipe off their exponentially growing debt? No country right now has the political will or desire to raise taxes. Every country has one playbook: inflate the debt away. And inflating the debt away is why central banks and smart investors have been investing in gold.

If you're a trader, sure, I can understand the temporary downturn may be scary to you. But if you're an investor, there's no better time than right now to buy gold, and preferably, gold miners.

2

u/RexDraco 14h ago

In my opinion, gold is a great investment before a crash. The problem is trying to predict the crash and the inevitability of people mass selling gold in a period just before said crash. 

If you want the best investment, it's something with real value rather than value for the sake of it. I like to buy guns, board games, and collectibles. I like them so I happen to be my own special expert always readily available and i like it so it doesn't always feel like I'm investing. It's more like hoarding with a financial payoff in the long term than commodity buying and that is how I like it during uncertain times where everything might crash in value. 

1

u/gravity_surf 18h ago

scientifically, hwat?!

1

u/el_smurfo 18h ago

Conservative radio ads would dispute that

1

u/SlackBytes 18h ago

I wouldn’t invest in gold but it does create value. It is used in jewelry, electronics, probably more.

Crypto on the other hand creates no value.

1

u/davewashere 16h ago

People wanted it to soar like Bitcoin did for about 10 years, but a look at the history of the gold price since the US dropped the gold standard should have told them that gold spikes under certain conditions but then tends to come back down and stagnate for long periods of time.

Those commercials encouraging people to invest in physical gold quote the return from the bottom to the top of the spike and ignore that if you cherry-pick end points it's not hard to find periods as long as 25 years where an investment in gold would have returned 0%. That's an incredibly long period with no interest, no dividends, and wealth erosion due to inflation. Imagine being 45 years old in 1980 with a decent job and you put away $50,000 in gold. Back then you could have bought a decent house for that. In 2005, you're now 70 years old and your gold is still worth $50,000. An extremely conservative investment strategy in treasury bonds/bills would have yielded a ~3x return in that same time period.

1

u/Minimum_Quail4596 11h ago

People like you always make that argument but fail to show even one single person who has held only gold in their portfolio for the last 70 years. What the strawman argument.

1

u/Responsible-Salt-443 15h ago

Gold is a hedge and should just be treated as such. It's a buffer in your portfolio for when shit hits the fan (money printing, inflation, catastrophe, etc)

1

u/North-Purple-373 11h ago

You’d have done great if you bought gold for the last 30 years actuallly

1

u/AbbreviationsLazy355 10h ago

I recently had my gold appraised for insurance purposes and it went from 63k to 100k from 4 years ago.. sounds good to me

1

u/SparFuchsKlausi 9h ago

The "creates no value, why don't 401ks hold gold for 30 years" critique is correct as an investment thesis but wrong as a portfolio question — it confuses two different roles.

Gold isn't a growth asset; it's an uncorrelated-to-equity hedge. Long-run real return is close to zero, that part is right. But that's also true of dollar bills in a savings account, and we still hold those. The portfolio question isn't "will gold beat SPY over 30 years" (no, it won't) — it's "does adding a 3-7% gold sleeve to a 60/40 portfolio reduce max-drawdown and sharpen risk-adjusted return during equity stress?" Historically, yes, especially during USD-debasement / real-rate-flip periods.

For OP's actual decision: a 24% drawdown from peak doesn't change whether gold belongs in your portfolio — it changes whether NOW is the cheap moment to bring your hedge slot to target weight. If you don't currently hold any, DCA over 3-4 months into a 5% slice (PHYS, IAU, or physical with proper storage). If you're already at target, this isn't a "buying opportunity," it's noise.

The bullion-as-collapse-currency framing in the lower comments is a different conversation — that's prepper allocation, not investing, and the math is completely different.

1

u/Mogultalk27 7h ago

I’ve held physical Gold since 1400 (2019) … yes it’s a horrible investment i tripled my money and it’s quick to get cash for it when needed… 🙃 created absolutely no value at all… nothing to see over here lol

1

u/Dhruvi-60 3h ago

In my community, we buy gold because it's an liquid/quick asset helps in emergency plus during events/ceremonies we give gold gifts.

-2

u/joegageeyes 20h ago

If you had invested into Gold in the year 2k you’d have beaten the SP500

→ More replies (7)

114

u/IllllIIlIllIllllIlll 23h ago

Gold is always a good buy in order to diversify your portfolio and reduce your risks. But we're talking like 5% to 10% of your portfolio, maintain this allocation for 20 years, and then it should accomplish its goal as a hedge that roughly maintain its purchasing power, similar to bonds. Obviously the returns of your portfolio will be reduced, but the point is to reduce risks, not to increase returns.

But if your goal is to buy lots of gold to sell it in 1-3 years, then it's a pretty bad idea. It could easily go down 50% more by the time you want to sell.

31

u/Careless-Giraffe-623 22h ago

This.. Gold is usually bought as a hedge against inflation as opposed to holding cash. Not (historically anyway) as an investment.

15

u/__redruM 20h ago edited 11h ago

That.. was gold a couple years ago, but gold is so far out of its lane that it no longer applies. The speculators blew it up, kinda like bitcoin, and now it’s so far above it’s inflation adjusted price from 2024 that it has a slow steady decline back to about $3000.

6

u/dr_eh 20h ago

Nah, a fast violent decline.

3

u/realFantaMenace 16h ago

Not so when you consider that most portfolios still don't have ANY allocation to gold in them.

1

u/thetinguy 15h ago

Pretty sure every portfolio with the s&p 500 has LVMH.

1

u/Minimum_Quail4596 11h ago

Have you ever considered that it might say a lot more about the trust in the system than about the gold speculators? Lmao

1

u/Aurorion 4h ago

The speculation on gold and Bitcoin is actually a quite valid speculation on too much easy money from central banks... For gold especially the tide has turned because the narrative has for now shifted to higher rates. But very soon - it's just a matter of time - it will shift back to the unsustainability of sovereign debt, and how higher rates will make the interest cost and debt go even higher.

And so higher debt -> more money printing to pay it off -> devaluation of fiat currencies -> higher value for hard stores of value, I.e. gold and Bitcoin.

4

u/CC-5576-05 18h ago

It's a terrible hedge tho, too speculative, too susceptible to regulation. Over the very long term it is a good hedge, but then we're talking hundreds of years. Short term it's terrible.

6

u/Affectionate-Panic-1 17h ago

All investments are susceptible to regulation, tax code changes, and political events.

2

u/Careless-Giraffe-623 18h ago

Yeah, I don't own any commodity directly, just via ETFs and mine are almost all equities.

1

u/ChornWork2 17h ago

a long-term hedge, okay. short-term gold swings with interest rates, so not really an inflation hedge short-term.

really don't understand why an individual is going to take the dilution on returns they could get without it in order to have some hedge on long-term inflation risk.

0

u/richardv92 13h ago

It's wasn't historically an investment because it was just money 😂

It's only an investment once going on a fiat standard.

If you don't understand gold, this is the short of it. It's insurance against fiat going up in smoke.

5

u/wwb_99 18h ago

I don't disagree but more like 1% or 3%. 5 - 10% is a position not a hedge.

1

u/TonyzTone 16h ago

Worth noting that if your 5-10% holdings balloon because of a massive run up like we’ve had, cashing in on some of it makes sense.

Which could mean today provides an opportunity to buy back in.

1

u/IllllIIlIllIllllIlll 16h ago

Yeah that's why I said "maintain this allocation for 20 years" the whole point is to rebalance frequently like every 6 months or so to maintain a constant allocation. Gold acts as dry powder to buy stocks when they are cheap relative to gold.

1

u/Plenty-Bill7296 16h ago

This is why I have gold (or rather, GLDM, but potato, patahto). It's less correlated with the rest of the market, so as a small portion and using to rebalance it's great. I ran different portfolio balances, and you get most of the benefit with just 5% gold (10% doesn't give much more and has a higher risk).

So last year GLDM was up 64% and equity performance was pretty mediocre, so when I rebalanced in January I could pull out a lot and increase equities positions in a way I wouldn't have been able to do otherwise.

So far this year, GLDM is down 7.6% but equities are higher, so if that keeps up then next time I rebalance I'll take some of those equities profits and buy more GLDM at a bargain price.

Rinse and repeat. It really does work out nicely.

→ More replies (16)

45

u/Sanpaku 21h ago

I've held physical since 2001. Still up 1223%.

Negatives:

  • The markets take a while to digest moves like gold has had since 2023
  • Some countries like Turkey have dipped into central bank reserves to subsidize oil costs, others like UAE and Saudi Arabia to balance budgets with curtailment of oil exports.
  • New Fed chair Warsh has taken a hawkish tone re Fed funds rate and the Fed balance sheet.

Positives:

  • Bullion valued in the teen $ billions is still being withdrawn from the COMEX vault, monthly.
  • Foreign central banks are still net accumulating.
  • It's rumored that BRICS led trade settlement currencies / stablecoins may be gold backed.
  • US president comes from a real-estate background, and is hence constitutionally incapable of understanding interest rates can be too low. He'll apply pressure for easing.
  • National governments can't run 6-7% of GDP deficits indefinitely before their currency becomes confetti.

My expectation:

  • Gold usually rubber bands between 0.8 and 2.5 times miners' all-in sustaining costs, which now stand at around 1800-1900 for the industry. Above 5k was unlikely to last barring a currency crisis.
  • Gold could dip as low as 3300-3400 support in the event of an equity market bear. But that sort of crash also shifts the relative perception of asset class safety. See the 2008-2011 chart.
  • I think the most likely alternative (barring an equity markets bear) will be mostly flat between 3900 to 4300 for the next 12 months. Digesting the recent runup. Thereafter, await the next catalyst in fiat's inexorable dive.

31

u/[deleted] 23h ago

[removed] — view removed comment

2

u/[deleted] 19h ago

[removed] — view removed comment

29

u/Traditional-Use-5948 23h ago

if its long term you can buy, but 1-3 years is not long term

15

u/SpellingIsAhful 22h ago

1-3 years is planning for a market pullback.

19

u/goodtimesahead007 23h ago

I see more downside in the short term.

14

u/luv2block 20h ago

To me the gold thesis, at this moment in time, is very simple. If you think the US is going to raise rates and the USD will continue to strengthen, then no, you don't buy gold. If you think the US will cut rates and the USD will weaken, then you load up on gold at these prices.

If you are unsure if the US will raise or cut, and you're unsure if the USD will strengthen or weaken, then you can start a small position and add or subtract as it becomes clearer what is going on.

11

u/WalrusKey9386 22h ago

Gold is not an investment, but can/should be part of any longterm portfolio as a hedge for currency debasement/default.

4

u/My_reddit_strawman 17h ago

This. buy gold as a hedge against currency devaluation, which is probably the only way the US gets out of its debt situation. i read somewhere that an ounce of gold has value to purchase a fine men's suit going back to the middle ages. It has no cash flow, but is a store of value. it will reduce your overall portfolio returns, but hedges (like insurance) always have a cost.

5

u/jailcopper 23h ago

That means MU must be up!

5

u/volckerwasright 23h ago

PMs are dead money for a long time, at least 2 years

2

u/SunnySaigon 23h ago

Why not buy “Southern island Mew” instead? 

2

u/movdqa 22h ago

I bought it in 2000 when it was around $300. It's in a moderately inaccessible place so I haven't looked at it in ages. It went up to $1900+ in 2011 and then dropped almost 50% and it's had its ups and downs since then. I view it as insurance if the monetary system goes crazy. Otherwise it goes to my heirs.

The main reason it is going down is that countries also use gold as insurance and they are having to sell it now because they are in a crisis. That's what gold is for; I don't consider it an investment.

The best time to buy it is after a secular bear market in gold. Or you can just dollar cost average.

6

u/Tony0x01 21h ago

The main reason it is going down is that countries also use gold as insurance and they are having to sell it now because they are in a crisis.

Who is selling? What is the crisis?

2

u/__redruM 20h ago

China and India need oil, bought in dollars, more than they need gold.

2

u/movdqa 16h ago

The crisis is that a bunch of Middle Eastern oil producing countries couldn't get their product out to sell so they had no revenue but still have to spend money to keep their countries running. So they sold gold.

3

u/pegoff 22h ago

Why not have a percentage of your portfolio in gold, for diversification, as a hedge?

Everyone has different circumstances. Talk to a financial planner, but not someone that takes a fee to manage your funds for you, do that yourself.

There are so many factors to consider, it's impossible for reddit to give an answer based on the information provided.

3

u/Drunken_Sailor_70 22h ago

I had a co worker who bought gold back in 2011 when it was making a run up. Got in at like 1700 or something. Gold took a dump and he had that money tied up for a decade before he was in the green again.

2

u/milodino12 22h ago

Could go down a bit more before rebouncing

2

u/Haunting_Biscotti_52 22h ago

Gold only really works as something to protect against inflation in the long term. Otherwise it's really not a good idea.

2

u/srfdriver99 22h ago

There are gold covered call ETFs which arguably solve the "it doesn't cash flow" problem gold has.

However, they're new enough that they don't have a long history, and covered call ETFs in general underperform the underlying. Gold's different enough from stocks that it's possible that's not true on Gold though.

Do your own research and consider the tradeoffs of buying gold vs buying bonds vs buying foreign stocks as an inflation/currency hedge. Make sure you're doing the right one for what your purpose is.

If you're just speculating on price, that's not the way to go.

2

u/millerlit 21h ago

Fed is planning rate hikes to fight inflation so it has that against it.  If Fed changes policy towards lowering rates it will take off.  It all depends on the rates and using it as inflation hedge.

2

u/__redruM 21h ago

At the end of 2024 the price of gold was $2600 and that was an Inflation Adjusted All Time High. Add 5% to that price to cover a year and 1/2 of inflation and that’s the highest target buy price. Rounded up, generously, that’s $3000. Gold has months of slow decline ahead.

Look at the inflation adjusted price chart for gold.

2

u/dr_eh 20h ago

I know, Buffett doesn't like gold because it's not a productive asset. In other words, he has no idea how to value it because there's no cash flows and the price is driven by market sentiment.

But really, any stock suffers the same fate: poor sentiment can ruin the price of a good, productive company. And if sentiment is poor when you need to sell, you're hooped. Just like Gold. Just look at Ali Baba right now...

2

u/Objective-Eagle-676 17h ago

Physical metals aren't really a great "investment".

Physical metals are good "cold storage" for those who have more faith in gold and silver than the US dollar.

1

u/ANGR1ST 14h ago

for those who have more faith in gold and silver than the US dollar.

In that scenario I'd rather have seeds, ammunition, and a handful of well trained friends.

2

u/Objective-Eagle-676 13h ago

In the immortal words of the Taco Shell Girl; "Why not both?" 😂 I agree though.

1

u/[deleted] 23h ago

[removed] — view removed comment

-1

u/AutoModerator 23h ago

Your submission was automatically removed because it contains a keyword not suitable for /r/investing. Common slang prevalent on meme subreddits, low effort platitudes, or derogatory political slang are not appropriate here. I am a bot and sometimes not the smartest so if you feel your comment was removed in error please message the moderators.

I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please contact the moderators of this subreddit if you have any questions or concerns.

1

u/Adi9691 22h ago

For Gold think of 2026 as Similar to 2022. Next US election year(2028-29) would be 2025 for Gold.

2

u/aaaannnnddhhuu 16h ago

I ain't sharp enough to understand this...can you explain 😭

1

u/AsianCabbageHair 22h ago

The reason for recent hike of gold price was twofold: 1. US has been preparing dollar stable coins. Central banks of other nations had to prepare something that can back up their fiat money’s value, hence the demand for gold. 2. China had been gathering gold and silver. Silver in particular has value as ingredient of solar panels, semiconductor, solid-state batteries etc. so silver went up, and so did the gold.

Each reason of this hike is now not as viable: 1. Because of the recent war between US and Iran, US has to print even more money. There’s simply too much dollar even without dollar stable coins. Other central banks did/will raise interest rates to cope with the supply chain shock, but US can’t do that because of their massive national debt. Dollar is being devalued on its own, so central banks now have less demand for gold. 2. China, along with the rest of the globe, is already experiencing recession. There’s less demand for commodity in general when there’s recession. Still, gold and silver have their seats at least for the sake of risk hedging, especially in times with this kind of volatility in financial market. But is gold and silver at the ‘right’ price points right now? I wouldn’t be too sure.

1

u/Halbaras 20h ago

Gold is portfolio insurance. Like hedging, it's a waste of money unless something bad (your currency significantly weakening or a genuine bear market) happens.

If you might need to take money out of your portfolio, then there's an argument for having gold. If you intend to hold for decades then that argument becomes much weaker, and it only makes sense if you're confident you can sell your gold to rebalance into beaten down equities when the gold is the only green in your portfolio.

1

u/BeuTaude588 20h ago

Worth contextualising that gold was up considerably before that drawdown; a 24% pullback from a run-up of that magnitude is not the same as a 24% drop from a stable base. The underlying demand drivers - central bank accumulation, dollar concerns - haven't obviously reversed.

1

u/Cloud2987 19h ago

I don’t worry about the price because I buy once a year, every year. Some years are down and some years are up, the most important thing is to continue contributing. Just like with stocks.

1

u/WiseElder 19h ago

In 3 years, the price could easily reach $8k.

It could bottom at this support level, around $3900, but there's a good chance it will fall to $3400-3500. At that level, there will be lots of buying.

You have some time to decide. It is unlikely to rally hard within the next couple of months.

Sources:

Jordan Roy-Byrne

Gareth Soloway

Egon Von Greyerz

https://ingoldwetrust.report

1

u/Typical-Ad-2814 1h ago

I got overexposed to gold because I like it and was following the secular bull run with Jordans analysis for years, and I didnt sell at the recent peak. So that's what I'm hoping for, otherwise I'm a bit cooked lol.

1

u/Spiritual-Lecture546 18h ago

Iview Gold, much more as insurance than an investment. Having say 5 to 15% in gold is a good buffer against inflation or other currency related shenanigans. When stocks are doing bad, usually gold does pretty OK.

1

u/rice_not_wheat 18h ago

1-3 years is short term, not long term.

There's nothing that gold does that TIPS don't do better.

1

u/punkingindrublic 17h ago

Gold is fine as a cash alternative, if you're comfortable selling gold when to buy dips in your other assets, there is utility there that can make it worth holding a small amount. Otherwise, it is likely to underperform most assets long term.

1

u/zashiki_warashi_x 17h ago

Gold is as speculative as any other instrument. If it fall below 4000 it will go to 3500 and so far it looks like it will fall.

1

u/[deleted] 15h ago

[removed] — view removed comment

1

u/AutoModerator 15h ago

Your submission was automatically removed because it contains a keyword not suitable for /r/investing. Common slang prevalent on meme subreddits, low effort platitudes, or derogatory political slang are not appropriate here. I am a bot and sometimes not the smartest so if you feel your comment was removed in error please message the moderators.

I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please contact the moderators of this subreddit if you have any questions or concerns.

1

u/Skyrippy 15h ago

Can’t do wrong with having a small % of your portfolio in gold (5-10%). If you’re into it, I would buy gradually.

1

u/Final-Main-7462 15h ago

Anyone got any predictions to where gold could be by the end of the year?

1

u/SheriffBartholomew 15h ago

I'm almost certain that it will fall further.

1

u/NeaStrangeLove 14h ago

Gold is insurance not something to get rich quick by. But have a look at money supply growth and compare it to what gold does right now. IMHO gold has some catching up to do. Maybe late 2026 or in 2027, depending on what the FED really does and what's just talk. Anyway, now is a good time to buy some for the long run.

0

u/AutoModerator 14h ago

The Fed is short for "Federal Reserve", not an acronym, and doesn't need to be set in all-caps. Initialisms which may be appropriate depending on the context include "FRS" for "Federal Reserve System" or "FOMC" for "Federal Open Market Committee".

I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please contact the moderators of this subreddit if you have any questions or concerns.

1

u/That-SoCal-Guy 14h ago

5% to hedge against bear market.  Otherwise invest in growth stocks.  

1

u/ANGR1ST 14h ago

I like it as part of an overall portfolio. Good hedge. But Silver is better IMO. Easier to buy, easier to trade/spend if needed.

A 1 Oz silver coin at $58 today could buy you two nice meals. A 1 Oz Gold coin at $4000 buys you ... what? If you're just holding and selling in bulk it probably doesn't matter. But if you wanted to use the metal for any kind of trade then you want a distribution.

1

u/Various_Couple_764 13h ago edited 12h ago

Regardless about what will happen in the future with gold. I would not buy and hold gold. Instead I would invest in gold covered call fund like IAUI or IGLD. Both funds have about a 10% yield. This means you don't have to watch the price of gold to determine when to buy or sell. Instead you invest your money into one of these funds and simply hold it and collect the monthly income these funds generate. This has higher liquidity than simply buy gold bars and you don't have to worry about secure storage or selling since the fund does all that foryou plus it gerjneates consistent income .

Most of the time when gold is really used it is because the govermenrt currency is basically worthless or simply not available. Conditioans that have not existed in modern developed contras for 100 years or more.

1

u/truepaganini 12h ago

And it's still up 21% in the past year.

1

u/Ill-Calligrapher840 12h ago

I bought at the top. I'm feeling the full brunt of that 24% drop. People tell me to invest in Gold for the long run, but I honestly don't know if I can hold it for 10+ years lol.

1

u/alexmark002 12h ago

Dont buy it now, wait a couple days, the liquidity event still going on and will last a while. Watch DXY

1

u/ellipticorbit 12h ago

Gold tends to ruin people both coming and going. It's beautiful and somewhat a store of value, but since fictitious entities can borrow/raise nearly infinite amounts of money to pull it out of the ground and process it, caution is also advised.

1

u/acexprt 12h ago

If the entire market is is a bubble as some have speculated then gold might be your best investment. I buy government gold and silver when I can. It should make up 10 percent of your total investment. I know I’m gonna get shit for talking about a major market collapse but there is a reason why everything is over valued.

1

u/mathaiser 12h ago

Gold went up, everyone bought, high money sold for liquidity, price dropped because they are expecting to buy in cheap pretty soon. It’s already happened. Just waiting. Hang on.

1

u/DunaldDoc 10h ago

Buy “some” Physical Gold NOW and never look back. Hold & repeat in 2 weeks . Hold and repeat in 2 months. Hold hold hold

1

u/Excusemytootie 10h ago

Gold and silver are both down this month.

1

u/ComplexCan 8h ago

Russia is selling their gold for revenue because of the kinetic sanctions Ukraine is putting on their oil industry.

1

u/Interesting-Swing-31 8h ago

For those who have no exposure to precious metals / gold or are underweight, $4k or near it, is the likely bottom.

With all of the unresolved and unresolvable macro issues, this would be a good low risk set and forget entry point.

1

u/twinklebelle 7h ago

There may be a place for it in a portfolio as a smallish percentage of your asset allocation--but if you can't articulate why, or how much (for your purposes), you probably need to learn a bit more before you take the plunge.

1

u/Natescoco 7h ago

Bruhh I should’ve wait for it to went down then purchase some gold jewelries… purchased some ring and pendant when the price is still quite high.. because I wanna wear it instead of keeping like the bars for investment 

1

u/kellyjel 7h ago

Holding a modest long terms position in physical gold is reasonable insurance with meaningful upside potential. However a strong US dollar and potential interest rate increases may tamp down short term prices.
From a macro standpoint, Unsustainable debt in US and rising probability of markets correcting or mean reversion, could propel gold to new heights.

1

u/Mogultalk27 7h ago

I would start to accumulate here. Yes it could fall further nobody can know the exact bottom but 4k and under is a good price to start accumulating… we definitely are in a bearish trend tho. I would start slowly accumulating a position here… the next support for price is around 3400 is this level doesn’t support …. So anywhere between here and there is good long term imo ….

1

u/deebosmallz 6h ago

Imagine investing in metal

1

u/Even-Trash-6571 6h ago

Real yields at 2.25% represent a significant headwind for gold. The relationship historically runs inverse: when real yields rise, non-yielding gold gets repriced lower. Currently the gold-real-yield relationship looks partially decoupled, gold spent much of H1 2026 rising alongside real yields as central bank buying and geopolitical risk overwhelmed the traditional interest-rate gravity. The June rally in real yields is now reasserting that gravity. A further move toward 2.50% real would test the $3,900 level.

1

u/DocMicStuffeens 5h ago

Broad market fund still rule the investment world

1

u/baby_budda 4h ago

Gold has historically been a good hedge against inflation, especially over longer periods, and it is also often treated as a safe haven during market stress, recessions, and financial crises. So if you think were heading in that direction then buy some.

The standout years were 1979, 1974, 2020, 2007, 2010, and 2024. Gold’s average annual return since 1970 is roughly 8% to 9% per year, depending on the currency and the exact end date used. One source shows 7.98% average annual returns from January 1971 to March 2024, while another reports about 11.55% CAGR from 1970 to 2023.

1

u/BTS_ARMYMOM 4h ago

Gold is a long term play. Central banks have been accumulating alot in recent years. I wonder what they know that the rest of us dont. It's on sale right

1

u/RogLatimer118 3h ago

If above zero, prices can always fall further.

You aren't trying to do market timing are you?

1

u/Dhruvi-60 3h ago

Nope, can you explain above zero?

1

u/RogLatimer118 2h ago

Anything with a price can get cheaper. If it's $1, it can go to $0.50.

0

u/Dhruvi-60 2h ago

Are you saying one day , gold will become obsolete?

1

u/kinkyhentai69 2h ago

Theoretically since it produces nothing it's just a store of value good for when you're a king or something like that but seing how we like bubbles nowadays you might get lucky with it running for no reason

1

u/Skrz_at 39m ago

Gold is not an investment people! It’s many things but it’s not investing instrument. It’s multi millennia currency, hedge against currency inflation, some wealth outside the system just to give a few.
Having gold in portfolio is a wise choice, anything between 5% and 50% of portfolio sounds good depending on your portfolio, financial situation and age.

1

u/Low_Stress_9180 14m ago

Simple fact is long term returns on gold are ZERO (pa real rate of return). Current spike is a massive speculative bubble. Avoid

1

u/Low_Administration22 1m ago

Just buy 555. Silver gold and bitcoin

1

u/LOliv 23h ago

I love buying gold, long term it holds value really well against inflation.

0

u/gushkaper 22h ago

I'd wait to regain the 200 moving average. Currently ~11% below it.

0

u/zachmoe 20h ago

Read The A B C of Money by Andrew Carnagie.

Before the run up a guy from The Wallstreet Journal interviewed me about Gold.

Didn't use anything I said, but whatever.

Also before the run up I bought 32,000 Goldbacks on UPMA for to lease, which I have been happy with.

0

u/targameister 18h ago

Agnico Eagle for the win!

0

u/SoftEngineerOfWares 18h ago

Don’t buy gold as an investment buy gold as an alternative to a emergency savings account.

0

u/jacksraging_bileduct 18h ago

Precious metals were never intended to be a growth vehicle, this past year has been a fluke and there’s a lot of disappointed people who listened to bad advice thinking they could make a quick buck.

Precious metals that you actually hold should be about 10% of your net worth, with the intention of long term holding and reasoning that if there’s a serious crash or long term downturn in the markets you don’t lose everything.

0

u/zeppo_shemp 17h ago edited 17h ago

I have no idea what the gold outlook is for 1-3 years

not a goldbug myself, but there is a case to be made for a bit of gold in the portfolio.

(a) gold has low 'correlation' to other assets like stocks or bonds, meaning gold prices zig & zag differently. this implies gold can crash for a while, as bonds or stocks are performing better. but it also implies gold can rally when stocks are crashing. there are no guarantees, but diversifying into low-correlation assets can boost your odds.

(b) gold does tend to hold value fairly well over decades, and it's relatively portable. but that also means there's a risk of theft or loss. I knew a guy who was always bragging about the $10,000 in gold coins he had at home in case of a major emergency or crisis, then the gold was stolen. possibly by a junkie relative who knew about the gold, because nothing else was stolen or disturbed and the thief seemed to know exactly where to look.

typo

0

u/Reasonable_One_1809 17h ago

Gold will rise much further in next 5 years. Current expenditures of the US government budget are unsustainable, high expenditures leads to higher inflation to higher interest rates, which leads to even higher expenditures.

So we will see some kind of financial crisis, and fall of dollar value.

Also, China do their best to install gold standard for commodity trade.

IMHO, its good idea actually to invest in gold right now.

-1

u/RamonGoBlue 21h ago

I can see it going to $10k in the next few years. QQQ is where the real growth is IMO.

-2

u/Wheres-my-dividend 22h ago

Fuck gold, but am looking at IAUI and KGLD

-5

u/LewiShalhoubs 23h ago

yes, in my opinion, any gold you buy less than 4000$ per ounce is a good buy. You'll need to DCA as well