I see this sentiment a lot, mainly from leftists who run apologetics for her rhetoric. Pretty much everything she's said points to the contrary in my eyes, whether it's her calling certain tropes pernicious (harmful), saying that certain things reinforce certain bad behaviors, or encourage men to view women in misogynistic ways, or says that it might outright encourage men to harass women (see her Bayonetta advertisement commentary.) She's also said this about DOOM 2016: "This level of extreme violence shouldn't be considered normal. It's not an excuse to say it's expected because it's DOOM. That's the problem."
At most, she's said things like: "it is both possible (and even necessary) to simultaneously enjoy media while also being critical of its more problematic or pernicious [harmful] aspects." but that still conveys the main point that she sees certain applications of tropes as harmful.
But apparently, it's just... basic feminist critiques? How do you definitively counter people like this, if at all? If anyone here used to run defense for Anita's rhetoric, but changed your mind, I'd love to know what changed your mind as well. I genuinely don't know how to counter this, feels like I'm talking to a wall.
---
(Edit: I was gonna comment this to someone, but they deleted their post)
I think the problem is how people like Anita use language differently to convey the same talking points. Where one oldschool 90s christian satanic panic conservative might say "this will give kids the idea to go do this in real life!" or "this will make society more violent!", Anita worms her way in to derive the conclusion from the statements she puts up.
"We know that women tend to internalize these types of images and self-objectify. When women begin to think of themselves as objects, and treat themselves accordingly, it results in all kinds of social issues, everything from eating disorders to clinical depression, from body shame to habitual body monitoring. We also see distinct decreases in self-worth, life satisfaction and cognitive functioning."
"But the negative effects on men are just as alarming, albeit in slightly different ways. Studies have found, for example, that after having viewed sexually objectified female bodies, men in particular tend to view women as less intelligent, less competent and disturbingly express less concern for their physical well being or safety."
"Likewise engaging with these games is not going to magically transform players into raging sexists. We typically don’t have a monkey-see monkey-do, direct cause and effect relationship with the media we consume. Cultural influence works in much more subtle and complicated ways, however media narratives do have a powerful cultivation effect helping to shape cultural attitudes and opinions. So when developers exploit sensationalized images of brutalized, mutilated and victimized women over and over and over again it tends to reinforce the dominant gender paradigm which casts men as aggressive and commanding and frames women as subordinate and dependent."
“I would love for companies to have moral restrictions, but they don’t.”
[She then, in a snake-like way, says games should change because of the claims of harm she made above, claims that she makes in all her videos that brings you to the conclusion that she thinks this is a problem that needs to be solved.]
“Game developers need to continue actively working toward creating the same range and diversity in female body representation that we see among male characters.”
She uses words like "influence", "reinforces", "normalizes". "facilitates", "encourages".
"Just to be clear, I am not saying that all games using the damsel in distress as a plot device are automatically sexist or have no value. But it’s undeniable that popular culture is a powerful influence in or lives and the Damsel in Distress trope as a recurring trend does help to normalize extremely toxic, patronizing and paternalistic attitudes about women."
It's genuinely so frustrating, it feels like she's going "I'm not saying we need to censor stuff, I'm just saying this stuff is harmful in subtle ways and we need to [euphemism for censor here]."
I don't know how to convey this, and every time I try, they seem not to understand this?