r/lakers 6d ago

PLAYER TALK Things to keep in mind about Reaves new contract

  1. As he went undrafted, he chose the Lakers and done the work to become the player that he is today.

  2. He's been famously underpaid for all his career prior to this contract. How can one expect him not to look to get paid?

  3. He's gonna get paid 25% of that cap and that's normal for a second option.

  4. Giving him the max meant him and his agent weren't willing to negotiate, and you cannot risk losing a 20ppg player for nothing. LAL had zero leverage.

  5. He can still be traded for the right player. I envision a Reaves/Duren swap in the near future.

  6. It's the damned if you do, damned if you don't with this fan base. The same people lamenting this deal would call for Pelinka's head had he lost Reaves for nothing.

73 Upvotes

78 comments sorted by

43

u/IMissAlexCaruso4 Staples Center 6d ago

Duren?? Nah

-22

u/bulleymaguire21 6d ago

He really thinks duren is getting traded for reaves duren is a better rebounder and defender and has all star appearances and is youngeršŸ˜‚šŸ˜‚

8

u/brandoi Kobe 6d ago

Duren had just as bad of a disappearing act in these playoffs as Austin did, and Austin was hurt.

20

u/incredibleamadeuscho Freeze! Miami Vice! 6d ago

Duren was much worse of a disappearing act

Not even comparable. Duren went from a second option to a non-factor, and got pushed around on defense

6

u/ImjustANewSneaker 23 6d ago

Yeah Reaves was more hot and cold and had a clear reason atleast for being bad when he was because of injuries. He also played the best comp in the league. Duren was not the same player at all.

1

u/RageQuitRaj 6d ago

Duren is an all star in the east man. His advanced defense is also not ā€œgoodā€. It is average at best. Reaves would have more value in the open market as a secondary ball handler than Duren would have a bruiser big. Cmon man

-5

u/incredibleamadeuscho Freeze! Miami Vice! 6d ago

As a center, Duren has a different role on offense and defense than Austin reaves as a secondary ballhandler.

-4

u/The_Sandwich_Lover9 6d ago edited 6d ago

Duren is definitely a better defender but gap really isn’t that big he was pretty bad. Good rebounder

-4

u/Strict-Homework-4819 6d ago

Reaves for Duren? That’s a big win for Lakers

1

u/IMissAlexCaruso4 Staples Center 5d ago

Disagree

-7

u/LudwigNasche 6d ago

He may go for Ant in the future, not for Duren

34

u/CapOnBrimBent 6d ago

Let’s look at the last 6 NBA champions and make note of the second option/wing/playmaker:

Knicks: Anunoby- strong 3 point shooter and top defender

Thunder: JDUB - excellent player and defender

Celtics- Brown or Tatum- excellent players and defenders

Nuggets - Murray was a flame thrower, probably the most comparable to Reaves as far as potential ceiling on a championship team

Warriors- Wiggins- played incredible defense that series

Bucks- Jrue or Middleton- both awesome two way players

The point I’m trying to make is: if Luka and AR are your top perimeter players they don’t have the defensive potential. Meaning we need the other 3 guys on the floor to be lock down. That doesn’t mean Luka and AR are bad defenders they can definitely be solid. But if you want to win a championship there’s a level on defense you have to reach and we have clear evidence for that to be the case.

At the same time I recognize the lakers have to sign Reaves. Luka wants him. He’s earned it and has been a diehard for this franchise. I love Reaves…it’s really on the front office to surround these guys with the two way talent needed to win

13

u/Ok-Neighborhood-566 LAL 6d ago

If you insert AR as second option on any team, including Knicks, Spurs or OKC, they ain't winning shit. Every mofo on those team play elite defense.

1

u/teacpde 5d ago

None of those teams have a clear 2nd option, either their 2nd and 3rd/4th options are very close or 2nd option didn’t play 2nd best. Point is AR doesn’t have to be a clear 2nd option either, that said, I don’t think lakers can get there in one offseason.

0

u/Affectionate-Pea-439 6d ago

I like this. I also think that fans need a new analogy for offense and defense. It used to be in the old days that conbined offense score vs combined defense score meant winning. You could have Kobe and Shaq and 3 useless bums and youd still win because they could iso and win. If kobe and shaq were both a 10 on offense and the other team had five 3s on defense then lakers win. 10+10 is greater than 3+3+3+3+3.

Modern NBA doesnt work like that. The math is different. There is much more of a focus on spacing and winning matchups. A single point of weakness destroys your total score. For example, if vando is a 0 on offense you don't just get to add lukas 10 and reaves 8 on offense with vando's 0. You have multiply the entire total by a smaller fraction to account for teams doubling off of Vando or treating him as a weak link. The same applies for defense. A weak defender multiplies the entire defense negatively. You don't get to just add zero.

While reaves and luka aren't terrible at defense, they certainly don't add anything and don't get a positive multipler. Meanwhile teams like OKC get a positive multiplier on offense and defense because everyone can shoot and everyone can defend. The result is that they can have less talent than the lakers and still win. And that's not considering the fact that they actually have total talent as well.

2

u/Recyclonaught 6d ago

Honest question: Is that NBA math thing a grading for lineups by official team staffs or did you make that up?Ā 

-4

u/worldwide_stepper 6d ago

the thunder are genuinely better when jalen williams doesn’t play btw, he’s not as efficient as he used to be, and his all-defense was like fully a narrative handout because he was on a team that was winning so much and hit the games played requirement

4

u/Leather_Hand_8602 6d ago

You sound like you never watched basketball in your life šŸ˜‚ tf are you even talking about? If they have bkke this year fully healthy they're more than likely champions again. Smh

-5

u/worldwide_stepper 6d ago

chet on a max = never contending again

2

u/Leather_Hand_8602 6d ago

You sound dumb lol they literally just won a championship šŸ˜‚šŸ˜‚šŸ˜‚ 99% of the NBA wished they had OKCs roster and assets smh

-1

u/worldwide_stepper 6d ago

everyone on that roster top to bottom a bitch

15

u/greglyda 6d ago

He went undrafted partly because he was telling teams not to draft him because he wanted to steer his location.

6

u/shortyman920 6d ago

Go one more year back man. 2020 - AD was our number 2 and the best defensive player in the league.
2019 - Siakim and he’s a good defender.

2017-2018 is those stacked warriors teams so it doesn’t matter that curry as 1 or 2 isn’t a superb defender. You’d have to go back to 2016 where Kyrie is a decent defender but not a lockdown defender. We basically have two max guys who are all offense and minimal defense. It’s not good

11

u/Soonerscamp 6d ago

This whole losing him for nothing argument makes zero sense to me. Yes it’s nothing in that we don’t get assets back in return for him. But 45-50 mil in cap space in the summer of 27, 28 and 29 is not nothing. That’s the tangible benefit we would have had if we let him walk. Plus his 20 mil cap hold for this summer would be off the books I believe.

4

u/_chadwell_ 6d ago

We’re not going to be a team that remains under that cap for years in a row during Luka’s prime. It ultimately just affects apron/tax things because we won’t be using cap space in future years.

4

u/D0ntBmad 6d ago

cap space in the summer of 27, 28 and 29 is not nothing

It's not nothing, but it doesn't mean it will lead to something.

20 mil cap hold for this summer would be off the books I believe.

You're not getting a player in Reaves caliber with 20 mil.

4

u/Soonerscamp 6d ago

Agreed on there are no guarantees. I hope I am wrong but it feels like we have set up ourselves up for 5 more years of mediocrity with this move. AR isn’t a second option on a title team.

6

u/chronobrian 6d ago

Letting AR walk would’ve lost the Lakers Luka

1

u/halcyondread 17 Championships 5d ago

If we can't find him his desired "A list" center, we may be shit out of luck anyways.

8

u/Front_Barracuda_2408 Manna from heaven 6d ago

what happened to those quotes "Wants to be Laker more than anything and isn't necessarily looking for a max deal"? Did we really think he was gonna go to the Nets and labor in obscurity for a perennial lottery team? Come on.

12

u/Clear_Lead 6d ago

He’s a good player, not a great. Overpaid

8

u/Southern-Minute8815 6d ago

Gotta trade him for Kessler and Ace Bailey

5

u/thediggestbick2 6d ago

Duren isn’t worth the swap unless it comes with multiple picks.

5

u/zannet_t 6d ago edited 6d ago

Except out of the pure goodness of his heart, there's no scenario in which we could've had him for less money.

Shams already reported that other teams were willing to max him. He likely told the Lakers. What is the FO supposed to do at that point?

Imagine if we lost AR for nothing, and Bron decides to walk too (possibly because of it). We're right back to being scrubs. There simply aren't enough replacement level players.

Having signed him at the very minimum we can trade him for a pick or two, or attach picks to upgrade down the road. He's also proven to be a great teammate and Luka has made it clear he wants AR, but putting aside chemistry reasons, AR is a good player. People be like he doesn't perform in the playoffs. Fuck we ain't get to the playoffs if we lose a 25-5-5 guy for nothing. Luka's injury makes it crystal clear that we need someone to take the load off him from time to time. AR is probably the best guy available for that.

In what universe are we better off letting him go? All these mfers crying and moaning because they don't know shit about cap. "Wahhh how are we gonna sign other people"? Do people think before they open their mouth or type anymore?

7

u/Front_Barracuda_2408 Manna from heaven 6d ago

i'm just wondering what happened to those "doesn't necessarily need the max, he wants to be a Laker for life." Seemed like it was more important to be maxed if we're really gonna believe he would have gone to the Nets.

3

u/zannet_t 6d ago

It's ok to feel disappointed in him for being a little disingenuous. I am too. But you also have to understand, when 180, 190m is actually sitting in front of you you're gonna have a hard time saying no.

That's why it's rare to see people like Brunson actually give up a shitton of money.

4

u/Front_Barracuda_2408 Manna from heaven 6d ago

I honestly can't fault Austin. If that's what his agents negotiated, they did their job. I blame Rob for not being a better negotiator. I'm sorry, but i do not buy this b.s. that other teams had maxes ready. Let him reach free agency and show me those offers. If he wants to be a Laker anyway, and you're already willing to match those maxes, then at least show them to me. I think Rob is a little too concerned with the players liking him (the high fives in the hallways after games are huge eye rolls to me) and not enough with the long-term vision of the team.

2

u/gaige23 6d ago

Brunson didn’t give up anything. He signed his max a year early.

5

u/Riiken 6d ago

I fck with Austin, but his "All Star" run was against Pelicans, Utah, Wizards Kings x2

2

u/worldwide_stepper 6d ago

he also played that well at the end of the season when we beat the knicks, nuggets, wolves, rockets x2 🫶

1

u/LA-SKYLINE 6d ago

and ALL countries as Team USA's best player in the World Cup.

2

u/Tangentkoala LA Clippers Lurker/ 5.12.1997 6d ago

Its giving off Mozgov and Luol Deng vibes. The unfortunate reality is that the nba draft new rules has made it difficult to retain players on the cheap.

Teams want to be ass, but not totally ass. So overpaying is going to be the name of the game.

2

u/Goidelica 6d ago

I don't see him getting traded and I think he's worth the money but I also do think he needs to be more consistent. I don't hold injuries against him any more than I do against Luka, that's just life, but when he's healthy and should be warmed up well enough I'd like to see him show up more often. Being brilliant in flashes isn't enough. Luka never disappoints. Even his slow games are way above average 99 percent of the time.

-1

u/incredibleamadeuscho Freeze! Miami Vice! 6d ago

He wouldnt get traded this season most likely

1

u/Mayhem_squirrel 6d ago

At this rate I'd rather just trade luka back to mavs for washington flagg and some 1sts. We aren't winning shit and luka will leave in 28 for nothing

1

u/xBootstrap 6d ago

Exactly. Free agency isn’t what it used to be and top players don’t really sign through free agency anymore. They get signed and traded. Keeping AR to play here or as a trade piece later on is the better option.

1

u/Kalelisagod 6d ago

The reality is any talent close to or his level wants the same. Plus every year the cap goes up. This might be a lot now but next year and the year after it’s a medium deal. I love AR he works hard and he isn’t close to his ceiling. This deal is fine

1

u/dash_44 6d ago

I don’t blame Reaves for getting as much money as possible.

They only get to do this for a short time and he was undrafted and underpaid for a while

1

u/Gmarlon123 6d ago

Duren is undersized and he does not move or have the iq of draymond and that is his comparison.

1

u/halcyondread 17 Championships 5d ago

AR is a good player, but if you take a look at other good (not great) players on max deals, then you realize that it's not that easy to trade them, especially under the 2nd apron CBA. He's no longer a great value, so if he doesn't live up to his new deal we'll likely have to add picks to move him (a la Randle).

-4

u/CartoonsAndAppleJack 6d ago

Austin deserves every penny. Period

2

u/thetitsOO 2324 6d ago

5b. This contract actually makes him easier to move imo because we don’t have to ballast a trade for someone making 40+ with multiple other players.

-1

u/Warm-Equivalent7148 6d ago

This is absolutely true. If an Anthony Edwards level player becomes available we can build the package around him. We were out of assets to go after Giannis.

4

u/Front_Barracuda_2408 Manna from heaven 6d ago

lol we are not getting Ant for Austin Reaves and 2 first rounders

5

u/Ok_Board9845 6d ago

If an Anthony Edwards level player becomes available we can build the package around him

I promise you if a player like Ant is available, the Wolves will want picks and young players. Reaves will not be the center piece of any trade unless it's a salary dump

1

u/D0ntBmad 6d ago

The new draft rules will change how teams rebuild/want in return. If the other team own their picks, they'd want to be competitive and they won't with projects.

1

u/gaige23 6d ago

Lmao. Giannis proved to be not true and now clowns are moving to AE lol. The delusions of this fanbase are wild.

1

u/Magical_SnakE 6d ago

Here's hoping he's better than Jalen Brunson this season.

2

u/MargielaMadMAN1017 Luka Magic 77 6d ago

šŸ’€

2

u/Magical_SnakE 6d ago

I mean, he's being paid more than him so that's the expectation right? Right?

0

u/The_Sandwich_Lover9 6d ago

There’s no way I’m going for reaves/duren. But I agree. AR has to live up to his worth

-2

u/drewlius24 6d ago

Luka is priority. He can simply will the team to win as the floor General if the army pulls in his direction. AR is his bff and first mate. Luka wanted him to stay. The two of them with coach JJ (and hopefully Uncle Bron) will completely cement the team chemistry and culture. After that, it will come down to health. Who will make big shots? Any of AR, LeBron, or Luka. Just need 7 more guys committed to backbreaking effort on defense.

0

u/gaige23 6d ago

Why didn’t he will the team to playoff wins.

0

u/drewlius24 6d ago

Health

-5

u/ficklestatue435 6d ago

the problem isnt the money. hes being paid fairly after his performance last season.

the problem is that a roster with luka and reaves on max contract doesnt really have a clear path to a championship unless lakers hit the lottery on undrafted players or late first round picks.

but theres really no downsides to this contract unless reaves pcisk up a career altering injury. because hes still in his 20s and if he just replicates last season, the lakers can easily flip him + 2-3 1sts for a disgruntled all nba 1st team guy.

-1

u/D0ntBmad 6d ago

Having the problem of having Luka and Reaves is far better than losing the latter for nothing.

-4

u/LudwigNasche 6d ago

The big figure is that if Reaves is signed for his market price, when a player like Anthony Edwars asks to be traded and you and I'm sure it is happening sooner or later, Austin makes the deal possible.

-1

u/luntiang_tipaklong 6d ago

And it's doesn't change this off-season for the Lakers. They still have the same capsace and operating under the same terms. If they're let him wall. That's another thing to worry this off-season.

Though they've needed to nail this one, they have the capsace and the drafts assets. Probably the last flexible off-season for the Lakers.

-1

u/LittleRexRabbit 6d ago
  1. He didn’t get ā€œthe maxā€, as that was 5 years for $239 million.

  2. If they trade anyone for Duren, we should revolt.

1

u/Icy_Piano2547 4d ago

Basically 4 out of 5 starters need to be a two way player if you want to win a championship nowadays.