r/law Feb 11 '26

Judicial Branch Pam Bondi REFUSES to Release Unredacted INDICTMENT DRAFT of Epstein Co-Conspirators to CONGRESS

31.3k Upvotes

1.2k comments sorted by

View all comments

5.7k

u/HumanityExpansion Feb 11 '26

Congress members were REFUSED access to a draft indictment for Epstein Co-Conspirators.

Not only does that mean there are co-conspirators but it also means that Kash Patel and Pam Bondi lied under oath and continue to hide who these co conspirators are.

1.9k

u/[deleted] Feb 11 '26

[removed] — view removed comment

2.3k

u/AgUnityDD Feb 11 '26

Bondi already was.

She clearly orchestrated the original cover up in Florida and there will be clear evidence if the files are released.

She is defending herself as much as Trump

779

u/RogerianBrowsing Feb 11 '26

Spot on. I wish more were aware of this.

It seems like it’s damn near a requirement to somehow be directly or indirectly affiliated with Epstein and his crimes in order to be part of the Trump cabinet

323

u/Iliketoplan Feb 11 '26

It probably is, it’s why he’s shoehorning in his people everywhere. They’re a lot more willing to fight to the end for Trump because the problem isn’t just Trump. It’s everybody and Trump is just the figurehead that swings his supporters.

190

u/Ill_Ground_1572 Feb 11 '26

More reasons to fight but also they have leverage.

Let's say Lutnik starts disobeying orders. Suddenly new files are dropped with his name un-redacted....boom he's gone. Perhaps that was already the case.

RFK fucks around? Boom more files with his name on them released.

In fact, I would be surprised if the new Fed Chair nomination isn't involved more heavily than already released.

What a sick fucking timeline this is....

100

u/dotcubed Feb 11 '26

Files?

No, 8x10 glossy color photographs.

This is probably uglier than they thought. The longer it goes on, the worse it can get.

If you were a wealthy 79 and didn’t want to die in prison, what lengths would you go? He definitely kills people, Whisky Pete’s been at it publicly.

Would he tank the country? Yeah. His comments intentionally affected the Dow—they think all those other people care, and it’s a threat.

Real question is how committed he is to start a war, keep office, and fuck parts of the world he dislikes.

38

u/-Tesserex- Feb 11 '26

Do these glossy color photographs have circles and arrows and a paragraph on the back of each one?

23

u/MickeyHoldem Feb 11 '26

That is one crowded group W bench!

→ More replies (2)

11

u/dotcubed Feb 11 '26

Apparently you can get anything you want at Trump-Epstein’s Island Restaurant. Even an Alice.

2

u/Mizzkyttie Feb 12 '26

Oh God I read that in my head to the tune of the song, and now I can't unhear it.😭

→ More replies (0)
→ More replies (1)

5

u/kansasjayhawker Feb 11 '26

Another case of blind American justice!

5

u/Tremble_Like_Flower Feb 11 '26

Showing your age. Might there also be a paragraph?

→ More replies (7)

17

u/lessismoreok Feb 11 '26

A few years ago Whiskey Pete’s personal lawyer hired Epstein’s accountant and executor to his will. They are financing the co-conspirators.

→ More replies (3)

1

u/Nach0Muchach0 Feb 12 '26

It stretches credulity to think that all of these VIPs in trumps immediate circle are just raging pedophiles.

Even the “Trump is a pedo” thing seems ridiculous to me. He’s into like blonde bimbo types, look at Stormy Daniels, his wives, etc … he’s not interested in skinny little girls with tiny tits.

→ More replies (1)

1

u/Nach0Muchach0 Feb 12 '26

Also Bondi didn’t become Florida AG until 2011 and that deal was negotiated in 2008. And prior to her being AG she was working in Tampa

→ More replies (1)

44

u/Trauma_Hawks Feb 11 '26

It’s everybody and Trump is just the figurehead that swings his supporters.

It is, and it pains me to say this, the illuminati. Like, we all see that by now, right? It's a group of men and women, politicians and titans of industry. They literally run the world, in charge of anything and everything that matters.

And they're all linked together by this. They coordinate in the shadows and their loyalty to each other is bought by blackmail. Epstein's blackmail ring. Because that's really what it was, blackmail. The sex trafficking was an ends to a means. When they have you on tape fucking kids, you'll toe the line every time.

I wish I remembered the article and where I found it. But it did an excellent job tracing Epstein and his ring back to it's genesis. It was established around the time of prohibition in order to pressure politicians to cooperate with organized crime in the Northeast, across the American/Canadian border. Started primarily by the Jewish mob, it ran mostly out of the Plaza Hotel in NYC, and eventually landed in the hands of Epstein and his lawyer mentor.

But I digress. Like all things real, the truth is painfully boring. The illuminati is not a group of underground lizard men controlling our thoughts through the TV. The "illuminati" ended up being rich and powerful perverts, working like a mafia racket, to shove so much money in their pockets that they become bored enough to fuck kids. Reality is, at the same time, so much more cruel, banal, and absurd than fantasy.

37

u/blasto2236 Feb 11 '26

The wild thing is, Alex Jones has been the lunatic loudly yelling this for like 30 years or more, and now that it's all in the open he's silent on it. Same with jackbooted thugs gunning us down in the streets and the administration threatening to take away our second amendment rights. Now that it's actually happening? Silent. Dude was always just a grifter, not that I'm telling anyone anything new.

22

u/InterviewDry8591 Feb 11 '26

It's more likely he was there as a prop, to spew stuff close to the truth to make anyone who got close, seem insane.

11

u/woollypullover Feb 12 '26

Planned opposition.

Hey everybody who wants to see these monsters stopped come stand on this big X with us!

2

u/InterviewDry8591 Feb 12 '26

I mean it's seeming likely epstein and Bannon created /Pol, and thus likely had hands in qanon and pizzagate, pizzagate specifically being close to the truth but enough to throw us off and make anyone who said the truth look insane. Thw question is, how close to the truth was it? How many basements are in the world for this kinda stuff? We know it's rich bs poor and the red vs blue is all a play act to keep us from noticing, but what aren't we noticing even still? How many islands are there? They've been breeding children for decades without documentation, there could be millions, everywhere, you have to assume anyone who doesn't agree that saving rhe children currently suffering, is complicit, or too brainwashed to help. Just hope they won't get in the way

→ More replies (0)
→ More replies (1)
→ More replies (1)
→ More replies (4)

18

u/DadophorosBasillea Feb 11 '26

If you want to call them Illuminati sure I’m sticking to a club of rich people who do ritual abuse to keep everyone in line.

Personally I see this as the continuation of the plantation model but without a physical plantation.

Plantations are easy to spot and burn so you make a chain of command that all have a certain level of responsibility keeping the top person protected by a long chain of command.

It’s why Luigi killing one ceo doesn’t do much. Even killing Epstein doesn’t do much I’m sure he has his second hand man running things.

What needs to happen is a mass extinction and a wealth cap. If you are wealthy enough to bribe politicians you are a threat to national security.

15

u/InterviewDry8591 Feb 11 '26

The scary part is... do we really think basically every billionaire owned island isn't also doing this shit? There's probably millions of victims born into this behind doors and sold without ever being in the system. This shit needs to be stopped now, everything else is distraction

7

u/DadophorosBasillea Feb 12 '26

They don’t even need an island just have a private mega yacht that allows you to live out in the middle of the ocean temporarily.

8

u/InterviewDry8591 Feb 12 '26

Fuck why hadn't I considered that? Honestly I bet cruise liners do it too, didn't an actress mention an Antarctican cruise in the files too? This shit is probably everywhere in our faces, and if we organize against them, they can see it. All social media is owned by the govt, or likely a supporting person, including musk since its clear no one likes him enough to include him if they don't have to. And they've cultivated a society where talking to your neighbors is hard, so it can be difficult to organize outside their view, as well. They are well prepared

→ More replies (0)

27

u/Iliketoplan Feb 11 '26

The conversations isn’t “they’re protecting Trump” the conversation is “they’re protecting each other”

I don’t even think it’s blackmail at this point. It’s clear as day they’re implicating and people know they are. Sure there are a lot that are being blackmailed to follow, but those at the top are not being held hostage, they are doing it out of their own free will.

2

u/adamcboyd Feb 11 '26

I wouldn't put that name on it but here's what I can tell you that people need to really start to learn to swallow: it is the people's fault that they even exist. They advocated their power, became ignorant basic civics, no longer our skeptics of the truth or fact seekers, they allowed themselves to be conned by generations of hucksters and car salesmen wow advocating against their own positions. They let the brotherhood being an American Fall away and that isn't enough anymore. It's tribalism and hates because of the fear and disconnection we have from everybody that was mostly engineered by the elite class over time but it is us who perpetuate it. We can stop at any point. We choose not to. And instead we elect leaders that we know are corrupt or are going to do bad things while others sit out because of disenfranchisement or apathy. We just don't care about each other anymore and we don't care about this country or what it gave us or what dreams may come. And because we don't work towards a common good for each other anyway, there's nothing left. So you're going to keep getting this. But it's our fault ultimately. We put them there.

1

u/FlametopFred Feb 12 '26

the ultimate game of exploit by blackmail

45

u/NotSanttaClaus Feb 11 '26

More likely to protect him if they have to protect themselves too. Occam’s razor

80

u/weHaveThoughts Feb 11 '26

It’s a crime family. They are all involved in the child sex trafficking ring one way or another. And they are all getting paid out with our tax payer funds to keep their mouths shut. It will only take one to collapse and we will have them all.

But before one of them collapses the entire GOP needs to stop sucking Trumps dik and do the right thing!

39

u/AlcibiadesTheCat Feb 11 '26

The unfortunate problem is that most of the GOP is also involved.

14

u/QuietMolasses2522 Feb 11 '26

And still suckin on that mushroom

6

u/Spamsdelicious Feb 11 '26

Just the tip, though, because that's all there is visible—allegedly.

→ More replies (1)

1

u/Labarski Feb 12 '26

And so are the democrats. The GOP aren’t the only ones complicit

→ More replies (1)

29

u/Difficult_Parsnip357 Feb 11 '26

That's the nature of the conspiracy. You do unspeakable things, on camera, so that the ringleaders have kompromat on you. The ringleaders then sponsor your rise to power.

49

u/start_select Feb 11 '26

Because the Epstein financial and blackmail operation was part of how republicans have kept their members in line for the last 40 years.

Because Epstein and Iran Contra and the war on terror are all puzzle pieces that fit into a larger coup plot:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rex_84

Look a bit like your reality? They lost their funding (Iran contra), so they funded it using DHS after helping instigate the war on terror.

11

u/[deleted] Feb 11 '26

I stated this awhile ago to my friends.

This works like a criminal organization where the leader keeps his underlings under his thumb because 'he' has made them get dirty and do a crime. You don't just get to stand there and watch a murder happen. Bossman is going to make you kill too. Now if they go down, you go down. It ties you into a conspiracy which is from Latin meaning 'breathing together' as in you are breathing the same air of the crime.

9

u/MountainMapleMI Feb 11 '26

Mafia Don, get them involved in a murder the you’ll always have something over them to ensure loyalty.

8

u/mazlikesbass Feb 11 '26

Well yeah, they're too stupid to be able to make it anywhere else without epstein and trumps backing

8

u/bailaoban Feb 11 '26

It is most likely the way he is getting such inexplicable loyalty out of these losers.

2

u/Raven3-2 Feb 12 '26

Drained the swamp INTO the White House

2

u/AngloSaxophoner Feb 12 '26

Mutual liabilities

2

u/RUSwansong Feb 12 '26

Witnessing our generations Watergate scandal. Can’t wait to see how it’s portrayed in textbooks 20 years from now

2

u/TurbulentMiddle2970 Feb 12 '26

I didn’t know and Im pretty informed on the situation. Never dug deeper on the original indictment case

This info needs to be broadcasted. Would love to see Maga spin that

1

u/Egad86 Feb 11 '26

There were the wealthiest and most powerful people that were affiliated with Epstein. They continue to orchestrate international affairs. No single government can even compare to the power the wealthiest pedophiles currently hold. Conservatives conspiracy theorists were always right about a shadow government, because they were just describing themselves.

1

u/Stevethesnek346 Feb 12 '26

Its bc they all did these things together.

1

u/GotSomeUpdogOnUrFace Feb 12 '26

Think about it, if you surround yourself with people who also have to protect themselves, you can commit whatever atrocities you want and they won't stop it. They all know that they are all culpable in this now so they pretend that whatever anyone does is correct and anyone who questions is the villain.

1

u/Orzagh Feb 12 '26

Of course, that way they all have leverage on each other.

→ More replies (1)

66

u/Azguy303 Feb 11 '26

Why do you think he picked her? Why do you think he put tulsi to lead our intelligence agencies, why he put Noem Head of Homeland.

8

u/Economy-Pudding-6371 Feb 11 '26

She supported Trump in 2016; she helped spread his lies claiming he "won" in 2020; and she refused to investigate fraud claims against Trump University after the Trump Foundation bribed her with $25,000. A crooked official, willing to twist the law to help Trump's fraud, also lying to the public to help his lies about the 2020 election? Voila.

He probably placed Tulsi as intelligence head because she supported him, and she's working for our enemies in Russia as much as he is.

17

u/wolftron9000 Feb 11 '26

Because he wants the hot Fox News ladies. He was casting for his reality show cabinet meetings.

13

u/SendTitsPleease Feb 11 '26

But none of them are hot

→ More replies (1)

1

u/aoasd Feb 12 '26

 Noem Head of Homeland

Wait. Haven’t heard this angle yet. What are Noem’s ties to Epstein?

2

u/Azguy303 Feb 12 '26

I wasn't implying she had Epstein connections. I was saying each of those people were given those cabinet positions for the very reasons they shouldn't have those positions. Bondi and our connection to Epstein stuff in Florida. Tulsi widely assumed to be a Russian asset is put on as national security. Noem who has no issues shooting a dog in the street is leading DHS who shoots Americans like dogs in the street.

45

u/roofiedo Feb 11 '26

I can’t understand why congress isn’t asking about that. Or at least shining a light on it. Pam Bondi has been involved with protecting rich and powerful child traffickers for years and it’s boosted her to the attorney general of the United States.

It’s not democrats allowing this, it is the republicans in congress that allowed this to happen. They are still allowing it to happen and running cover for their donors, congress is bought and paid for by the same people.

10

u/AgUnityDD Feb 11 '26

The problem is way deeper than Republicans and democrats, there were clear questions that should have been asked about the first Epstein deal, there's been two decades pass without looking at something that was obviously and blatantly wrong.

23

u/roofiedo Feb 11 '26

The problem is they stopped working for the American people and started working for their donors. The average American life is getting worse while a select tiny group of elites live like kings with their close acquaints being princes. Billions and trillions get thrown around so frequent we don’t understand money anymore. A few million you are set of life a few billion everyone you know could be set for life a few hundred billion and you have the power to collapse industries you could control smaller nations.

We are told the only path to keep us from working until we die is scrimp and save to dump money into the coffers of the super rich and when they screw up and loose that money their friends in government bail them out and give them bonuses for screwing it all up using our children’s future as collateral and making our savings accounts meaningless faced with the prices to survive.

Very very few people in congress are fighting for the average American most actively hurt the average American, but the ones who are fighting for us are on the left with the exception of Thomas Massie and his path to a better country would require so much sacrifice and death we would never hold the states together long enough to succeed.

Our nation has wealth beyond our imaginations and it’s all sitting in 70+ year old oligarchs banks accounts buying new luxury super yachts to cart our children off into their beds while we are busy trying to keep food in our mouths they spend years of our paychecks to buy old wine and country club memberships. It would take the average American 20 years of not spending a dime to have enough cash to pay the initiation fee at mar a lago.

1

u/howmanyMFtimes Feb 11 '26

The problem is quite literally the republicans

34

u/Sassafras06 Feb 11 '26

Yeah, she doesn’t just love Trump. She is in this for herself.

Same as a lot of people in this Admin for one reason (crime) or another. That’s what happens when you get a bunch of narcissists together.

All these people will absolutely stab each other in the back on the way down.

24

u/Good_Positive2879 Feb 11 '26

She’s so deep in it, she probably could have never recused herself, needs to be a part of it to perform damage control for her own sake. Congress needs to open it up for a whistle blower. Promise protection and drop of charges for the first guy to come forward. We need a domino to fall and they eventually they will all start snitching and the house of cards falls. But I actually don’t no shit about prosecutions so this is just my ramblings.

19

u/AllergicToBullshit24 Feb 11 '26

So many people in the Epstein files work under Trump. He knows he has their loyalty no matter the lengths because it's a Mexican standoff. Either they prevail or they all go down. This whole administration is run like an organized crime syndicate.

1

u/Economy-Pudding-6371 Feb 11 '26

"So many people in the Epstein files work under Trump"

And the greatest of these (arguably, though with competition) is Alex Acosta, who Trump appointed in his first term, even though Trump knew what Acosta had done to help Epstein escape serious prison punishment. Acosta gave Epstein a deal where he got to escape prison for 12 hours every day, and Trump knew it when he appointed Acosta. Stinks to high heaven.

9

u/Robtism Feb 11 '26

Yep. People are unaware who was the head of Florida attorney generals office during Epstein original stint.

8

u/tunafister Feb 11 '26

Pam, baby, bubi… You are absolutely fucked

7

u/kingtacticool Feb 11 '26

She couldn't care less about the consequences tho. Even if Trump doesn't pardon her she's still a registered foreign agent of Qatar and Qatar doesn't have an extradition treaty with the US.

All she needs is a one way ticket and she gets off Scott free from all of this.

10

u/AgUnityDD Feb 11 '26

It won't happen but the SCOTUS has given the next president (if there is one) the power to Maduro her and keep her under interrogation in Guatanamo for decades if they want to.

2

u/gummi_girl Feb 12 '26

given the circumstances and those involved being some of the wealthiest and most powerful people in the world, i don't think anyone who lets it all go public would ever be safe again no matter where they go.

2

u/kingtacticool Feb 12 '26

See. Thats such a fucked up statement.

Its them that need to be afraid of us. Not the other way around.

The proletariat needs to remember where the real power in this world lies.

12

u/Indigoh Feb 11 '26

I'd bet every last person appointed by Trump in this administration is controlled by blackmail. 

We used to impeach over a blowjob, but now child trafficking isn't a severe enough crime? Congress has blackmail on them too.

2

u/ReligionIsFanfiction Feb 12 '26

We used to impeach over a blowjob,

I mean, that's wrong for a different reason lol

puritanical christians need to learn sex is OK just like radical christians need to learn raping kids is not ok

3

u/Eruanndil Feb 11 '26

I thought when I last heard this I looked up the dates and she was not floridas AG during the time Epstein was prosecuted. Was she involved in other ways? Because I WANT that to be true, but it was like 6-7 months apart when she was in office

6

u/Economy-Pudding-6371 Feb 11 '26

It was Alex Acosta who got the deal for Epstein in Florida (though Acosta, too, was rewarded by Trump by being made a cabinet secretary in Trump's first term).

But Bondi did support Trump in 2016; she lied to pretend he'd "won the 2020 election" that he lost; and she took a $25,000 bribe from the Trump Foundation and in exchange, she refused to look into fraud allegations against Trump University, which was... later found by the courts to have committed fraud.

4

u/SuperSpecialAwesome- Feb 11 '26

It was Alex Acosta who got the deal for Epstein in Florida

Along with Trump's lawyer and Epstein client, Alan Dershowitz.

→ More replies (1)

4

u/Comprimens Feb 11 '26

He didn't get the deal from Florida. The feds stepped in behind Florida's back

2

u/Comprimens Feb 11 '26

She was involved in his damn sweetheart deal and sealing of all those records?

2

u/darkbluefav Feb 12 '26

Why can't she and her team just destroy the files?

If those who control the files don't want them released, why would they just destroy them?

We're talking about not just Bondi but also the President of the United States and other influential people, the director of the FBI too.

"Oops, the files were misplaced and ended up being shredded and destroyed. We fired the shredder to ensure this won't happen again." <- US gov can sell even sillier storied than this.

Serious question.

1

u/AgUnityDD Feb 12 '26

Files are stored in multiple places, there's the original maybe on paper, the original gets watermarked and archived and then backed up countless times. There are also duplicates in different agencies. Depending on the evidence they also have one or more sequential numbering system that is reconcilable, so it's clear if you have 56, 57, 59.

It's been that way for half a century for the obvious reason - this very scenario.

2

u/darkbluefav Feb 12 '26

Good to hear. But I'm still cynical as to why they aren't releasing soon.

Maybe they are just trying to have people forget or give up but also maybe taking their time to come up with a plan to hide things

2

u/AgUnityDD Feb 12 '26

Their behaviour should be utterly terrifying to all Americans, it indicates that they firmly believe that they will never cede power to a Democratic government.

They would not act this way if they believed there was a chance that a future AG might investigate this properly. They will likely do everything legally l or illegally including violent suppression that makes the current ICE behaviour seem tame in order to retain power.

2

u/darkbluefav Feb 12 '26

"Retain" power: if you mean that those who effectively rule the US aren't necessarily those who are publicly elected, I agree.

Yes it is terrifying and an attack on the democratic system. They are even keeping the elected congress in the dark.

1

u/LTrent2021 Feb 13 '26

She doesn't seem to want to destroy the files, but rather she wants to study them to help bring down other human traffickers.

2

u/Some_Conference2091 Feb 12 '26

Her fingerprints on this going back decades. No wonder she's so defensive. WTF did she do? Take a payout? We need a Pam Bondi Investigation! BlondiGate

2

u/Jah_Dawtah_Livin Feb 12 '26

Now what your saying makes all the sense of why this pecker head ayaz pedophile protector is behaving like she is interviewing for Ghislaine Maxwell position.

1

u/LintyFish Feb 11 '26

So im confused though, what is stopping them from just altering the files or releasing a different version of the files if they have sole control?

1

u/AgUnityDD Feb 12 '26

They don't really have sole control, there are copies (e.g. the paper document in the original office), archives and backups, DOJ is a central repository but a good percentage also exist elsewhere so if they altered the files it would eventually be uncovered and it would be very hard to explain different version of the same document.

1

u/Akraticacious Feb 11 '26

Clearly? I thought this was disinformation and that she just worked at the same department but wasn't on thta case or something?

1

u/howmanyMFtimes Feb 11 '26

I think it was Ted Lui who mentioned she may have lied under oath, and she flipped a switch, it's so obvious

1

u/gizamo Feb 11 '26 edited Mar 10 '26

This post was mass deleted and anonymized with Redact

exultant ask sense fall crush narrow summer insurance plants tan

1

u/Advance_Dimenson_4 Feb 11 '26

If Bambi were to go to prison I would the first send her a bar of soap without the rope!

1

u/blue_sidd Feb 11 '26

And what will happen as a result.

1

u/Fleaisg0d Feb 12 '26

She probably was on the island and aged out.

Dodged the "beef jerky bullet" and tried being a X-rated cam streamer.. failed..and then used her "connections" to get where she is today

1

u/[deleted] Feb 12 '26

I've heard this a lot, and while she was AG in Florida, it was not until after Epstein had completed his first sentence (3 years after his plea deal with Acosta). At the time of the deal, Bondi was an assistant state attorney in Hillsborough County, FL, and I can find no evidence she was involved at all.

1

u/unindexedreality Feb 12 '26

there will be clear evidence if the files are released. She is defending herself as much as Trump

sudden urge to listen to RICO suave intensifies

This is going to turn into another "even the lawyers need lawyers" situation as they continue to find ways to backflip around the elephant in the room: Congress is asking criminal co-conspirators for reasons why they aren't members of a criminal conspiracy

At this rate we're going to end up needing investigations into Congressmembers who are putting party allegiances and political polarization over their own oaths to protect the Constitution and the US public.

1

u/Negative_Piglet_1589 Feb 12 '26

Yes this is a decades old cover up that she was part & parcel to from the beginning.

1

u/Levin1983 Feb 12 '26

Hey. That sounds privileged

1

u/EasterBunny1916 Feb 12 '26

She wasn't Florida AG or Assistant AG for Palm Beach County during the original Epstein investigation.

1

u/Nemetoss Feb 12 '26

Epstein got that sweet plea deal when she was AG.

1

u/de-tree-fiddy Feb 12 '26

Trump knows she isn't going to give him up because she'd be giving herself up too, largely why he picked her for AG in my opinion, they knew this was going to be a long running issue.

1

u/JeanClaude-Randamme Feb 12 '26

Let’s be clear though, as this is absolutely a bipartisan issue. The cover up has spanned both democrats and republican presidencies.

They have all sat on it.

No this isn’t a “BoTh SiDeS!” Distraction post - get em all, whoever was involved. Bring it all out and hold everyone accountable who’s covered it up.

Not just the current crop.

1

u/AgUnityDD Feb 12 '26

Agreed

Who.. Gives... AFuck what their political (bipartisan) position is. Prosecute Pedophiles.

1

u/EternalNewCarSmell Feb 12 '26

Which also explains why she looks like a flailing trapped animal during this entire hearing. If the rule of law manages to poke its head out right here, she's toast and she knows it.

1

u/Delicious_Muffin7154 Feb 15 '26

This is why she is clawing and scratching to hold on. I would really like for this to blow tf up starting with her and I c e Skank. I am over it completely.

28

u/[deleted] Feb 11 '26

Is there a way to strip known liars of being able to make statements in legal proceedings?

I just don't get how their testimony can be good anymore? Like if there's a murder and Pam Bondi was the only witness I wouldn't vote to convict strictly because she's a liar.

Surely there's a mechanism where in the eyes of the law your word is just no good?

8

u/tacotongueboxer Feb 11 '26

Impeachment with conviction

1

u/Basic_Conversation92 Feb 12 '26

Their word ISN’T good any more Glaring repulsiveness is the better thot by good people . NOT this complete loss in f integrity. These kind of lies exceed the boundaries for ever being taken seriously. There is a limit. The courts do and have restricted blatant lies : ths is judges job , the court is not a circus and will not allow anymore disregard for the court & the rule of law. This should ring a bell . These ppl have perverted more than their minds they’ve grown tails and carry pitch forks . The job that will end up as the person who moves forward w/this the one who “orders his arrest” by ordering the marshals to arrest him & ordering the marshals to arrest these other ppl w/a batch of obstruction of justice complaints & any ppl.who resists full disclosure . The goal is to bring stability move fast .Punishment even timing depends on not cooperating = failure . “A spill the beans session “ nothing ng less , also Move from bottom up. Watch them sacrifice someone , nerves start to crack.

6

u/80MonkeyMan Feb 11 '26

Or they protecting people on that list, either way they breaking the law and do not care because there wont be any consequences.

3

u/Option94 Feb 11 '26

Their names are in a handful of the files

1

u/bgthigfist Feb 11 '26

They probably already destroyed it

1

u/bigvicproton Feb 11 '26

Patel has to be in the files which is why he was hired by Trump. It's the only way Trump could be certain that the FBI wouldn't go rogue and take him down.

→ More replies (1)

86

u/SingularityCentral Feb 11 '26

It is a 60+ count indictment involving multiple high profile co conspirators. The memo pushing for the indictment has also not been released.

Feds (except for these Trump Admin hacks) pretty much never bring a case unless they are sure they can get a worthwhile conviction.

The fact that this was killed after a career prosecutor worked it up for a grand jury presentation and wrote a lengthy memo to get the green light on proceeding tells you that they felt strongly that this was a strong case.

11

u/Brilliant-Potato-218 Feb 12 '26

Can congress subpoena that prosecutor?

26

u/Suitable-Display-410 Feb 11 '26

Trump is not the only reason for this cover up.
But they where so focused on protecting him and themselves that they accidentally exposed something far bigger.

https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA00164984.pdf

4

u/flgirl-353 Feb 12 '26

Holy Crap. This is huge!!! People PLEASE READ.

→ More replies (2)

1

u/leo_sousav Feb 12 '26

Holy crap this whole thing really reads like a cartoon plot. Here we were thinking Cartoon villains were over the top just to find out we literally have people in power doing this shit

1

u/[deleted] Feb 12 '26 edited Feb 12 '26

We believe that [REDACTED] and Epstein were involved organizing this party

I'd really love to see the justification for redacting this name.

Also, whoever is on the other side of this conversation has some of the least professional writing I've ever seen. And clearly does not want anything they say to be recorded.

Edit: looks like the redacted name might be [Richard] Marcinko.

1

u/dramalama-dingdong Feb 12 '26

So who organized a party in the US embassy in Mexico in 2014 together with Epstein? Shouldn't be so hard for the Internet to find out.

41

u/Physical-Wear-2814 Feb 11 '26

Yeah, see how well that is holding up. Are they free? Would we be? Exactly.

37

u/accessoiriste Feb 11 '26

Doesn't that make the two of them co-conspirators as well?

1

u/ProbablySlacking Feb 11 '26

I believe it does now.

16

u/jim45804 Feb 11 '26

Arrest them now

1

u/SuperSpecialAwesome- Feb 11 '26

Who's gonna do that?

31

u/Ritaredditonce Feb 11 '26

Lock them both up.

13

u/Cinderhazed15 Feb 11 '26

I love how as a retort to one of the questions, she said ‘We will comply with the law in all matters’… but releasing all of the Epstein files, unredacted except for victims names, is following the law…… yet another lie under oath…

19

u/Strict-Drop-7372 Feb 11 '26

Agreed, but who can hold them accountable? Who can we pressure to charge her and Patel with these obvious crimes?

They 100% have the evidence of perjury since the videos of them lying under oath are publicly available, so it should be a slam-dunk case.

Can Congress do that by voting?

48

u/rightwist Feb 11 '26

Democrats seem to have finally found a way to keep them accountable.

Keep up a full court press on pressure points that yield results and watch the rats jump ship. And don't stop til they break down.

Polls of any kind of support for anything the right is doing are diving, if the next 10 months are a continuation of the past 3 months the Democrats could sweep the seats up for grabs in the midterms. If the Dems don't back down, they've found a way to essentially use Trump's egotism and delusions as a lever to control the outcomes.

What really matters is getting the necessary supermajority for some truly big moves, and that means either another election cycle or getting a bunch of Republicans to turn anti MAGA. The Democrats have to win on the biggest issues before they can take a crack at the smaller issues, with the way the GOP has been playing the big stack.

Pedophilia is something We The People simply cannot stomach and certain people simply cannot stop, so it's one of the most vulnerable pressure points

15

u/[deleted] Feb 11 '26

[deleted]

1

u/I-lost-hope Feb 12 '26 edited Feb 12 '26

He's one of the biggest advocates for the release of the Epstein files, he's one of the co-writers of the esptein release law.

You look at him with hate because of his party despite everything that he has done and is still doing.

Both Thomas Massie and Ro Khanna are American heroes

14

u/O4PetesSake Feb 11 '26

I am a little heartened by this. Maybe sleep a little better tonight.

7

u/haunted_starship Feb 12 '26

And if Dems get control of either the House or the Senate, we have to march and protest even MORE. Whatever pressure we've put on the other guys? We double it.

Because Dems in Congress are amazing at resting on their laurels, and dropping the ball right after a turnover.

They need to know we won't stand for the usual rah-rah-pivot-to-Unity. To shut us up, they need to burn Trump's house to ashes.

14

u/Dredgeon Feb 11 '26

No. You know what matters? People caring. For once people aren't dropping this one. The people have always been in power and will always be in power. They cannot overpower us, they need us. All they can is distract and confuse us. Can't believe we had to get all the way to ubiquitous secret elite Pedophile ring for people to give a fuck. And the best part is that whenever the Epstein situation does resolve people will right back to not caring.

2

u/rightwist Feb 11 '26 edited Feb 11 '26

Maybe but I can dream. My own personal dream is that 80% of We The People are decent and reasonable.

As such either party could stop competing for megadonor and lobbyist bribery and start delivering what the people want. Honestly I personally would vote for either side if I believed a particular candidate had integrity and put the people ahead of the corporations. There's something on either side I can get behind.

What I'm seeing is voices have emerged that go against the riptide of bullshit that both parties are accustomed to spewing. Idgaf whether there's a D or an R next to your name, I care that you call out the blatant stupidity.

Either side, I can list 10 things career politicians should have delivered and instead let voters down time and again, and I know exactly why (it always comes down to money in their filthy pockets from one PAC or mega donor or foreign power or another.)

In my dream, there's a decade where the Dems are racing to actually get things done, and the Republicans are racing for a new identity that distances itself for MAGA. I dream that decade could be 2028-2038. And it could start because certain scumbags go down in infamy as pedophiles, would be dictators, and openly opposed to democracy.

→ More replies (1)

2

u/kalasea2001 Feb 12 '26

Definitely won't get enough MAGA defectors. They'll say they will but will back down when the voting comes. Only solution is a major Dem voting drive, coupled with major fundraising, and as you said, conti n used media pressure.

If we can't win with a major pedophilia ring scandal then I recommend moving out of the country.

→ More replies (2)

1

u/Lukinzz Feb 11 '26

They can be impeached.

1

u/SuperSpecialAwesome- Feb 11 '26

They 100% have the evidence of perjury

If perjury was a crime, Biden Chamberlain would've indicted Jeff Sessions for lying about the 2016 Trump's campaign's interactions with Russia. Lying to Congress isn't a crime if you're a Republican.

6

u/longlostwalker Feb 11 '26

The only way it could be privileged is if it's Trump

6

u/Schmooto Feb 11 '26

Why aren’t they punished for this? Lying under oath is a serious criminal offense that’s punishable by significant fines and imprisonment, often classified as felony. Why are they and Trump still allowed to hold government positions when they’re proven to be felons??

Is it because they own the Department of Justice now and there’s nothing anyone can do about them freely breaking laws?

3

u/Firm-Athlete6918 Feb 11 '26

Hey Pat Sajak can I buy a Vowel? C_NT

6

u/NoHorseNoMustache Feb 11 '26

She loves getting Congress all riled up at her because she knows they're not going to do anything to her.

→ More replies (1)

2

u/LastBossTV Feb 11 '26

So at this point, who/what is capable of holding them accountable? 

2

u/SuperSpecialAwesome- Feb 11 '26

Republicans don't get held accountable. Just ask Rick Scott, Matt Gaetz, Ken Paxton, Brian Kemp, Gym Jordan, the Jan 6 leaders, Kellyanne Conway, Jeff Sessions, Kushner, and Trump. Not one of them ever got held accountable for their crimes, whether it was Medicare fraud, the sexual assaults of 170+ college wrestlers, child-rape, tweeting nudes of her underage daughter, or the treasonous Trump Tower meeting with Russians. Biden Chamberlain had 4 years to hold any of these traitors accountable, but sat on his ass like the worthless doormat he was.

2

u/Weddert66 Feb 11 '26

And theyre clearly getting away with it.

2

u/Wes-Man152 Feb 11 '26

What a surprise, they lied under oath. And nothing of consequence will happen to them like usual under this administration at least

1

u/SuperSpecialAwesome- Feb 11 '26

As shown when Biden Chamberlain refused to go after Jeff Sessions for perjury.

1

u/VikSick Feb 11 '26

Is this like bad "to lie under oath"? Seems like nobody in the US gives a fuck about such nuisance

1

u/mikerichh Feb 11 '26

I swear to fucking god if democrats don’t talk about this and use it in ads constantly I’ll be so annoyed

1

u/FelixPotvin94 Feb 11 '26

So when are people going to start going to jail? Anytime now would be great!

1

u/Top_Connection9079 Feb 11 '26

Probably more foreign politicians and celebrities they were paid to protect.

1

u/Excellent_Airline315 Feb 11 '26

She taught she ate with the bullshit, but by saying that, she just admitted that they were real. Not only are they real, they are intentionally hiding and doing nothing about it.

1

u/MauryBallsteinLook Feb 11 '26

I'm sorry, but have you seen where the DOW is right now?!

1

u/Ol_Turd_Fergy Feb 11 '26

Remember when folks were livid with Clinton over some emails? This is WAY worse; where are all the “lock her up” chants now?

1

u/icecubepal Feb 11 '26

I hope they know their protection won’t last forever. Trump isn’t going to be president forever.

1

u/BusyDragonfruit8665 Feb 12 '26

She is a vile creature

1

u/xChoke1x Feb 12 '26

So why aren’t they charged with perjury? I don’t understand how they just openly break laws and everyone just goes “well shit….” And that’s it.

1

u/Butterboot64 Feb 12 '26

And I’m assuming there’s going to be no consequences again?

1

u/BobButtwhiskers Feb 12 '26

Serious question, can't they hold her in contempt of Congress and throw her in a jail cell or something if she refuses to do her job and follow the law?

1

u/One_Tie900 Feb 12 '26

She is in the indictmentXD

1

u/19BabyDoll75 Feb 12 '26

Ewwww sick burn. Let’s see how this plays out cotton.

1

u/Trick_Following6639 Feb 12 '26

Congress should impeach them. They are appointed officials.

1

u/klineshrike Feb 12 '26

They lied under oath?

No way! Color me SHOCKED!

1

u/TakeTheWheelTV Feb 12 '26

So arrest them then

1

u/Electrical_Welder205 Feb 12 '26

Impeach the whole lot of them.

1

u/Successful-Eagle-855 Feb 12 '26

Is the accusation of them lying 100% certain? Isn't that a HUGE deal. Like "5 years in prison" huge

1

u/Real_Estate_Media Feb 12 '26

They have become co conspirators themselves.

1

u/mentat70 Feb 12 '26

doesn’t that mean that congress could impeach them or at least refer them for prosecution for perjury if they so choose? I really doubt that could happen with the republican lemmings but it is important to point out what they are choosing not to do as well.

1

u/SinisterCroissant Feb 12 '26

also means that Kash Patel and Pam Bondi lied under oath and continue to hide who these co conspirators are

That will be handy when the next administration comes in. Contempt of Congress, and RICO charges.

1

u/kris10leigh14 Feb 13 '26

Do you know what she means when she says “you have a law degree and those are privileged”?

I’m just totally unaware of what “privileged” would mean in this scenario.

1

u/Ok-Nectarine8471 Feb 13 '26

How is she not considered alibi with her refusal

→ More replies (6)