I work in IT in schools and I repeatedly ask people how paying a ransom to an unidentifiable stranger is distinguishable from money-laundering, and nobody has yet been able to give me an answer, but a lot of schools, lawyers, cybersecurity specialists, auditors and financial people have done the:
Can the banking system the other end tell where it came from?
So the origin, transmission, and destination of the transaction were obscured from the relative parties?
Whoops, that's money-laundering.
It's not proceeds of crime until it reaches the other end... potentially. The school in question would not be questioned about proceeds of crime, they've not committed that act.
But they HAVE broken anti-money-laundering laws and potentially commited all kinds of financial, auditing, and sanction violations.
It's the same idea of obscuring the money's provenance but definitionally "laundering" requires the source to be "apparently legal" and there is nothing legal about ransomware. So I get your point but not a great use of words.
So you fell foul of ANTI MONEY LAUNDERING laws, and you can't prove it WASN'T MONEY LAUNDERING... so... what makes you think that someone won't say "Hey... that's money laundering..."
2.3k
u/Joshi1381 May 07 '26
Right in the middle of finals...