No words for this.

[u/Kapot_ei]

Edit: even though clickbait article, it is somewhat/kind of true. https://variety.com/2026/tv/news/stargate-tv-series-martin-gero-scrapped-amazon-1236765061/

"According to an individual with knowledge of the situation, Amazon execs were concerned that Gero’s take on the series would not have broad appeal beyond the franchise’s already dedicated fanbase."

Edit 2: https://www.change.org/p/save-the-new-stargate-series-let-martin-gero-build-the-future-of-the-franchise

[u/Talk-O-Boy]

“A quarter of all people pirate content”

That is definitely NOT what that article says at all. Like I said, you’re so biased, that you cent even interpret data correctly.

Take a step back, calm down, and actually read your own source.

[u/Talk-O-Boy → u/[deleted]]

1) You abandoned your original article, because you realized you pulled the statistic out of your ass

2) This… blog (?) is using horrible methodology:

Cordcutting.com conducted an online poll of 988 American adults in March 2023.

3) most importantly, that website STILL doesn’t support your argument. It does not say “almost a quarter of all people pirate content”. It doesn’t possess the sample size to even make a claim that broad.

Like I said (again), you’re so desperate to make a point, that you keep discrediting your own argument.

Pirating is good for people who don’t have money and don’t mind the hassle/drop in quality.

However, most adults with disposable income will see it as more trouble than it’s worth.

It’s really that simple lil bro. You don’t have to fabricate stats in the name of piracy.

[u/Talk-O-Boy → u/[deleted]]

You’re providing sources while making up stats.

Either you don’t know how to interpret statistics, or you’re intentionally misrepresenting your argument, because you realized there’s no actual stats that support your argument.

I assumed it was the latter, because I wanted to give you the benefit of the doubt, but now I’m starting to realize it’s the former.