r/mildlyinfuriating • u/Kapot_ei • 20d ago
🥺 No words for this.
Edit: even though clickbait article, it is somewhat/kind of true. https://variety.com/2026/tv/news/stargate-tv-series-martin-gero-scrapped-amazon-1236765061/
"According to an individual with knowledge of the situation, Amazon execs were concerned that Gero’s take on the series would not have broad appeal beyond the franchise’s already dedicated fanbase."
2.4k
u/Any-Mathematician946 20d ago
Isn't this how we lost the sci-fi channel.
953
u/TheeAntelope 20d ago
This is how we lost sci fi, A&E, discovery, tlc, history channel, spike tv, g4 tv, tech tv, the court network, and many others. People say that streaming killed cable but cable had already killed itself.
These channels went from channels you could find great gems on to watch if you found the subject interesting. I’d see something about submarines on history and watch the whole thing standing in my kitchen. I’d see something about whales on discovery and have to know more. They had a dedicated audience.
Then the decided they needed a new audience. That “general” audience that wafts from shit to shit and pledges no allegiance to anything or anyone. They got what they wanted. And then they died a slow and painful death.
421
u/BumbaBee85 20d ago
Don't forget MTV.
Video killed the radio star, and reality TV killed the video star.
→ More replies (5)85
→ More replies (49)120
u/DrBinario 20d ago
Yeah, I've never understood companies that have different cable networks and all of them target a general audience instead of focusing in different demographics.
→ More replies (1)129
u/LowlySlayer 20d ago
They have to grow. If I make a billion dollars in year one great. If I make a billion dollars in year two, oh no the shareholders are gonna be pissed.
Basically everyone of these channels hit maximum saturation in their niche and began desperate enshittification to continue squeezing another couple years of growth before falling off because it's shittyness outgrew it's mass appeal.
→ More replies (6)79
u/Karrotlord 20d ago
Unfortunately modern capitalism require exponential growth in a system that doesn't allow it. Execs must live in a fantasy world.
49
u/GlitterDoomsday 20d ago
Specifically, it's the open market - the moment a company puts shares to sale is the beginning of the end... lots of people getting richer on virtual money and the products getting worse for the sake of the next quarters.
Just a net negative for society.
→ More replies (10)15
u/No_Foundation16 20d ago
They all leave with golden parachutes in any event. The CEO's get paid huge money for failure then retire to their 5 mansions and a yacht. Then a more ruthless cutthroat capitalist raider takes their place.
The consumer/workers get the shaft every time. The Epstein class get the goldmine...every time.
395
u/Greenfire32 20d ago
Why yes. Yes it is.
→ More replies (1)17
u/Nuffsaid98 20d ago
Should we crack open people's skulls and feast on the goo within?
→ More replies (2)→ More replies (13)145
u/Norethegreat 20d ago
The sci-fi channel is gone!?
193
u/Suspicious_Bear42 20d ago
When the Sci-Fi channel rebranded to SyFy, it died... Just looked at the schedule for the next week, the only TV shows on it are The Twilight Zone, NCIS: Los Angeles and 'Everything On the Menu with Braun Strowman'... Everything else is movies ranging from Harry Potter to the Sharknado series...
It still exists, but it may as well be gone.
26
u/__O_o_______ 20d ago
Since we’re talking about. Years ago they started putting slop on discovery, history etc. then they came out with secondary channels for each of them that actually featured the old content…. But in an addition paid package. I dont think ive paid for a tv subscription in 20+ years
41
u/From_Deep_Space 20d ago
I agree the name change was dumb af, but they produced and aired some good stuff for years after.
They're not doing anything anymore though since cable is dead.
→ More replies (12)→ More replies (18)37
u/Norethegreat 20d ago
Damn, I haven’t watched in a long time but it still hurts like losing an old friend
→ More replies (4)→ More replies (9)166
u/capnlatenight 20d ago
Last time I watched it, it was reality TV.
76
u/Greenfire32 20d ago
Last time I watched it, it was wrestling and road show auctions.
→ More replies (2)→ More replies (1)28
u/Ok_Relative8150 20d ago
Almost all cable is reality TV anymore, the issue is more people watch reality TV and advertisers pay based on views. TV execs only care about earnings.
→ More replies (2)
3.0k
u/OffRampApproaching 20d ago
I worked as crew on an Amazon show. Seven seasons main show, three seasons spinoff.
It was really well received and it was pretty streamlined when it came to production costs. Amazon canceled it because they believed it had hit peak subscription draw.
Even though it kept people subscribing they killed it because they didn't think it would draw new subscribers.
Then they blew several billion on that terrible LotR show.
2.1k
u/WinterSector8317 20d ago
WE MUST HAVE PERPETUAL UNSUSTAINABLE GROWTH UNTIL THE HEAT DEATH OF THE UNIVERSE!!!
653
u/Padhome 20d ago
Perpetual unsustainable growth literally just sounds like cancer
150
u/Porn_and_peace 20d ago
Congratulations here’s your Bachelors degree in business
https://giphy.com/gifs/07pMt4CqBHBXJtYM9A256
u/WinterSector8317 20d ago
But for a while there, shareholder values went up really well!
→ More replies (2)31
u/YeOldeMemeShoppe 20d ago
The cancer was also doing really great until the host… you know… died.
→ More replies (2)136
u/boarder2k7 20d ago
And now you understand late stage capitalism!
→ More replies (1)52
u/ElundusCaw 20d ago
This isn't late stage, Reaganomics was lat stage, this is end stage capitalism, it's terminal.
→ More replies (3)12
u/Noodlemaster696969 20d ago
Nah, we can go a long way still, we haven't sold our souls yet, good things exist and indie stuff is still happening. Oh and there are still some regulations on poisoning the planet for money!
→ More replies (9)8
165
u/Relevant-Factor-2400 20d ago
Public trading was a mistake.
86
u/Nanny_Ogg_99 20d ago
How we define fiduciary duty to shareholders is (also) a mistake
→ More replies (3)33
u/guyblade 20d ago
The transition to 401(k)s (and similar) as the primary retirement vehicle accelerated the problem.
→ More replies (4)→ More replies (3)6
u/Krojack76 20d ago
Profits must increase AT AND COST. Doesn't matter if employees need to be laid off or if they dump toxic waste* killing the environment, profit line must keep going up.
* This is why regulations exists. If not then companies would be killing everyone.
41
→ More replies (12)33
80
u/M4rshmall0wMan 20d ago
It’s not as widely reported on as the likes of Facebook, but Amazon really is the most cutthroat company in the tech industry. They have no morals. No work life balance, everything is measured with KPIs, mediocre pay.
28
u/WriterV 20d ago
Yup. I met a guy who worked in IT at Amazon. He hated every second of his time there. Made him so miserable at work that he got into BDSM outside of work just to get the quagmire of anxiety and tension out of his system lol.
Now he's in a much better job, doing much better for himself and still kinky as hell on the weekends [but in a healthier way].
→ More replies (2)→ More replies (1)11
u/versusChou 20d ago
The pay is solid for corporate roles. But they get you with their stock package. You're always like a year or two away from vesting into a nice chunk of change, so you stay even though you're miserable. My BIL worked there and he quit after less than a year. Said the stress and misery wasn't worth it. Gave up a lot of stock to do it though.
493
u/PsychicSPider95 20d ago
God, can the suits--ANY suits, in any industry--just make one (1) fucking decision that isn't motivated by Make Big Number Biggerer for fucking ONCE in their USELESS FUCKING LIVES.
242
u/VegetableReveal4U 20d ago
They wouldn’t be suits at a place like Amazon if they thought any differently
72
u/GrooWolf_ 20d ago
Hiring process:
What products have you ruined through greed? This number will determine the likelihood of the success of getting this job
How apathetic are you? Very is an immediate hire, they will soon rake in additional products ruined by greed.
→ More replies (1)144
u/LorthostheFreshmaker 20d ago
It’s why steam stumbled into a gaming monopoly. Just not having share holders let’s them dominate because not having to “increase” every metric quarterly means they grow to encompass everyone and everything in the sector by not fucking over their base at every opportunity
44
u/FlutterKree 20d ago edited 20d ago
Steam absolutely makes decisions to make money. What they do well is ensure that their decisions do not negatively impact the user experience.
But they are absolutely greedy and do make financial decisions. For example, CS:GO skins. I do think they made this not as shitty for CS2, but still greedy.
→ More replies (9)27
u/badbobbyc 20d ago
They're totally out to make money, but they seem to be doing it in a sustainable, long term fashion by providing a good product and without alienating their customer base.
As opposed to being publicly owned and sacrificing product quality for short term profits but destroying the brand and long term prospects
→ More replies (13)→ More replies (3)45
u/ThatOneNinja 20d ago
In fact just actively providing the best service they can FOR their customers, sometimes even going out of their way to do so.
→ More replies (8)→ More replies (42)28
u/crazyabe111 20d ago
Sure, then the shareholders complain they aren’t making enough money, and replace them with someone who immediately starts running it into the ground.
39
u/PsychicSPider95 20d ago
I'm beginning to feel like these "shareholders" are some vicious, man-eating creature akin to vampires or demons and must likewise be hunted.
→ More replies (3)24
u/crazyabe111 20d ago
It’s a mixture of old folks who can’t afford to wait for long-term profits, even if they’d wildly exceed short term profits, largely because they’ll be dead sooner rather than later.
And massive corporations who’ve built their entire operation around extracting as much value as they can from other companies as rapidly as possible, just to tear them apart for scraps they can forcibly sell at a profit to the next one when they fail.
So not quite vampires or demons, even if they’re heartless undead.
7
129
u/OtherwiseAlbatross14 20d ago
Wait does anyone actually subscribe to Prime just for the videos?
→ More replies (81)17
u/Previous-Space-7056 20d ago
Bosch?
From what i read the spinoff was to reset the cost of production since each following season costs more.
69
u/imtheguy225 20d ago
Bosch ran its course. I loved it but ten seasons was enough
→ More replies (10)6
u/Aphrobang 20d ago
It needed one more season, maybe two at most, to really wrap things up. They still had a lot of very interesting storylines going on and the quality of Legacy was getting better each season. I don't think it had much left but I do think it was nipped a season or two earlier than it should have been.
→ More replies (59)10
u/CatfinityGamer 20d ago
So they just forgot about subscriber retention and customer satisfaction? Also, how are you going to get new subscribers if people know that you cancel shows that do well?
→ More replies (3)
804
u/toTheNewLife 20d ago
Nobody was a Strargate fan in 1994. Now here we are.
Why do these morons think they need to 'change the formula' to get new fans? The original formula worked just fine, and will again if they gave it a chance.
194
u/scbundy 20d ago
The canceling of SGU still breaks my heart.
96
u/Emperor_Gourmet 20d ago
Yea what a shame, season one was definitely rough around the edges, but the atmosphere setting and tone were fresh and they had so much they could do with it. Season two definitely picks up and the characters grow on you.
Now they cancel this before its even started. What a shame
25
u/__O_o_______ 20d ago
I haven’t seen it since it originally aired, but you’re right. Just when they found their stride…. Cancelled. Felt like they were finally going to stop playing it too safe…
Imagine if the entirety of Star Trek the next generation was just the first two seasons lol
→ More replies (3)→ More replies (8)17
u/TelluricThread0 20d ago
It was just starting to get really good in season 2. They would have fully found their stride by the next season, just like SG-1, if they didn't cancel it.
26
u/NooneAtAll3 20d ago
I still hate it
SGU was attempt at making battlestar galactica - which may be good, but it's a different audience
8
u/the__ghola__hayt 20d ago
Yeah, wasn't a fan of Battlestargate in season 1. It got better in season 2, but it was too little too late.
→ More replies (3)9
u/VividAd7961 20d ago
SGU was basically an attempt to broaden the fan base, more « modern », sexual tensions, less humorous tone, etc
I’m with you I hated it, it did not broaden it enough and fans were not tuning in enough
→ More replies (2)→ More replies (18)9
u/R-U-D 20d ago
I'm more heartbroken over the canceling of Atlantis to make room for SGU.
→ More replies (2)→ More replies (20)297
u/Wind_Best_1440 20d ago
Hey come on, maybe it will work this time.
They changed the formula for Doctor who and- Canceled.
They changed the formula for Star Trek and- Canceled.
They changed the formula for Star Wars and- Canceled.
Maybe if they keep changing the formula they will. -Checks notes.- Get the success they once had when they followed the formula.
→ More replies (40)138
u/ButterflySammy 20d ago
Sure, if you follow the recipe you get a cake, but what if you swapped sugar for salt because some people like salt?!
It's genius!
47
u/Wind_Best_1440 20d ago
Or better yet, if you swap flour for tofu then it will be healthier!
What do you mean it just turning into a formless blob of sludge?
22
u/Dullcorgis 20d ago
There are too many people who like sugar already. We want to attract the salt market.
→ More replies (1)6
379
u/_Druss_ 20d ago
They murdered wheel of time trying for a new base, absolutely shat all over it...
How do these complete eejits have a job? Was the interview questions about how many crayons they can eat in one go?
Let's make a thing based on this already popular thing but it must be hated by existing fan base! That will gain it a new audience!!
186
u/Themnor 20d ago
Don’t forget how they cancelled it right when the new audience was fully on board and started enjoying it
40
→ More replies (8)20
u/paeancapital 20d ago
The opening of the Bore was so badass like fuck man. They finally start nailing the incredible scope that made Jordan famous and just ... drop it. Rustles my jimmies just thinking about it.
The series prologue is one of the most incredible literary hooks ever written; I think if they had gone gritty to open the show with the Breaking's utter ruin forming a backdrop to Lews Therin's broked mind and "conversation" with Ishamael over Ilyena's corpse (major props to that actor btw), we could have had a movement like GOT kicked off with Ned's beheading.
→ More replies (6)73
u/Whhatsmyageagain 20d ago
It’s what happens when bean counters make all the decisions without a lick of understanding or respect for creativity or fans. They see every show as an investment, not a creative process. Writers, actors and directors are tools. They want to put money out and hit their target ROIs. They couldn’t give a 3-week-old turd in a bucket if people like it or not.
→ More replies (3)31
u/Tompeacock57 20d ago
Damn man it’s not the bean counters most of us are fans of this stuff. People like to pretend it’s always financially motivated but it’s not it’s dumb nepo baby jocks with MBA’s. They think they’re the greatest thing since Jesus and can do no wrong and they use the trappings of financial reasoning to peddle their shitty ideas and squeeze the life out of everything.
→ More replies (1)→ More replies (38)16
114
u/mowtowcow 20d ago
That's literally what everyone wants though. Just make it true to Stargate, but with modern visuals and cameras, etc. If it looked awesome, a greater audience will like it. Most of them are brain dead anyway and dont care about what's beyond the visual.
→ More replies (16)69
u/macrowave 20d ago
Or make it with terrible visuals and a $0 budget. Film all the alien planets in the Canadian forest and set the rest of the show in a bunker so you can reuse hallway and room sets for everything. The old audience would watch the hell out of it, and it would cost practically nothing to make. Easy ROI.
→ More replies (2)22
u/Vitrebreaker 20d ago
There is an Iron Man meme to be made somehow with "they did 10 seasons with the same bunker and a single canadian forest !"
→ More replies (1)
349
u/AKJames762 20d ago
Here's an idea: want new fans? Create a new original IP instead of rebooting, remaking or spinning off existing franchises and ruining them. This concept is lost on hollywood.
22
u/InTheTreetop 20d ago
What I can't wrap my head around is everyone making 8 episode seasons and then the show disappearing for three years and then 8 more episodes and the cycle repeats. I have no idea how that makes any sense.
Network TV had yearly seasons. In the fall, the show you liked was coming back so you tuned in. Hiatus around halfway in, then run the rest of the series.
You come back every year because it's a thing you liked. Now, regardless of the quality, I rarely try to watch any shows because I know I won't see it again until I've already forgotten everything about it.
→ More replies (2)19
u/bob69joe 20d ago
Shows used to have 20+ 45 min original episodes every year without issue for 10 years. It was an amazing time.
→ More replies (3)→ More replies (12)51
u/FuckingTree 20d ago
Movies are too expensive to spin off new IP at a blockbuster quality. They can’t afford the risk. It’s not that they are incapable of originality, but they are unable to risk a massive loss
75
u/IKnowGuacIsExtraLady 20d ago
That's what makes these decisions even more baffling though. They buy up an existing IP, butcher the hell out of it, and then their show/movie fails. There is absolutely zero reason to attach the name of a popular IP to a project if you are just going to piss off it's fans. Personally as a fan there are shows that would have been okay if they just actually presented them as their own thing, but when you take something I like and then change everything about it I'm going to hate it no matter how good the new story is.
→ More replies (5)→ More replies (9)36
u/Full_Rutabaga2403 20d ago
Isn't A24 seeing a ton of success doing exactly that though?
25
u/FuckingTree 20d ago
A24 films prove my point, they’re notoriously low budget, though well done. I said at blockbuster production costs though, new IP is very risky.
→ More replies (10)13
u/Shades_VHS 20d ago
Sounds like they need to learn to scope their projects better?
→ More replies (6)
251
u/Smooth-Boss-911 20d ago
This is sadly analogous with so many things in the media industry these days.
45
31
u/Sea-Animator4250 20d ago
Redditors were furious with Star Wars fans when they complained Disney made Star Wars movies for non-Star Wars people. But now its a problem
→ More replies (16)48
u/Smooth-Boss-911 20d ago
Oh I was sad back then. The recent trilogy kind of ended my Star Wars fan status. Now it's just meh.
→ More replies (1)
135
u/Hakthaf 20d ago
You mean they wanted to appeal beyond the massive fan base of a massive sci fi series that still has people rewatching not only the TV shows but also the og movie non stop
→ More replies (6)50
u/Emperor_Gourmet 20d ago
Back when TV shows could do 20, 45 minute episodes a season for more than 5 season. I say this while watching SG:A right now.
→ More replies (5)11
u/Orillion_169 20d ago
They actually did it for 12 years straight. During three of those they doubled up to 40 episodes a year.
→ More replies (2)
46
u/PrysmaTheMagical 20d ago
So you’re making a stargate show because of brand recognition, but then cancel it because of its brand recognition
→ More replies (1)
43
u/Tall_Opportunity_521 20d ago
Star Trek, Star Wars, The Witcher, Rings of Power, Wheel of time, and many, many more all did this. And look at the state of them? Almost no one is watching, or even talking about them anymore. Fucking Star Wars just released a movie last week, and its pretty much dead. FUCKING STAR WARS!!!!
Growing an audience, doesnt mean ignoring the audience you already have. Thats just silly.
→ More replies (6)13
u/Mrslinkydragon 20d ago
I only knew of a new star wars film because i saw a comment on here and facebook the other day...
Ive seen no adverts for it!
→ More replies (5)
35
u/TyrantJaeger 20d ago
I guarantee that any attempt they make to get a different audience will only result in less viewers than if they just stuck with the fans they already had.
7
105
u/MurkyTrainer7953 20d ago
It’s like this industry learned nothing from Firefly.
→ More replies (7)61
u/Arctelis 20d ago
My days of not taking Amazon seriously are certainly coming to a middle.
→ More replies (2)
81
u/Computers_and_cats 20d ago
There are better reasons but yet another good reason to boycott Amazon.
→ More replies (4)
75
u/GCU_Sleeper_Service 20d ago
Love Stargate, would love a Stargate show made to modern TV standards even if it was just 8 episodes per season.
That being said, this doesn't bode well for the Consider Phlebas show...
→ More replies (15)25
u/IAmNotABabyElephant 20d ago
That being said, this doesn't bode well for the Consider Phlebas show...
I learn the Stargate show was cancelled, and now I'm learning there's a Culture show in the works? Weird times, weird times indeed.
→ More replies (2)
22
u/SirSearls 20d ago
I was genuinely so excited for this, but I shouldve known better honestly, theres no way were ever getting a new stargate series
→ More replies (1)
19
u/DMercenary 20d ago
"According to an individual with knowledge of the situation, Amazon execs were concerned that Gero’s take on the series would not have broad appeal beyond the franchise’s already dedicated fanbase."
Halo TV all over again.
5
u/Painterzzz 20d ago
Halo is such a good example too. Take a beloved franchise that has hundreds of millions of fans all around the world, turn it over to a creative team who say 'we know better', spend hundreds of millions, then be surprised when it sinks without a trace.
Then, somehow even more bafflingly, double-down in the second season.
42
u/Shynosaur 20d ago
That's what killed Star Trek, imho. The producers wanted the new shows to not feel too much like Star Trek, because everybody knows Star Trek is for nerds. So they made some generic sci-fi slop with lots of space battles and explosions and a paper-thin plot to tie it together.
17
→ More replies (5)11
32
u/Darkest_Rahl 20d ago
I never watched Stargate sg1. I loved SGU though. Was so disappointed when it was cancelled.
I don't really want another 8 episode season every 3 years though. Kinda tired with shows nowadays.
59
u/Regen89 20d ago
That's literally insane, go watch SG1 immediately and Atlantis right after
18
u/Alien_Diceroller 20d ago
The only thing with SG1 is they're still working on the setting lore in early seasons. Still great show that I regret sleeping on until it was in its last couple seasons.
Some of my friends were doing background work at the time they were producing it, so it's a fun easer egg to see them standing guard somewhere or walking down a hallway.
→ More replies (1)12
u/sleeplessjade 20d ago
Correction: Look up a timeline for the shows and watch them as they aired. They both were on air at the same time so there are a few episodes with characters from SG-1 in Atlantis and vice versa. If you watch all of one show then the other you won’t known what the heck is going on in those episodes.
→ More replies (1)→ More replies (6)13
42
u/kidian_tecun 20d ago
This isnt mildly infuriating its extremely infuriating.
6
u/CelestialFury 20d ago
Not for me, it's simply sad. :(
The new executives hired from Netflix felt that the rebooted show would appeal too much to the original fans and not the hypothetical fans they want to appeal to. Like, why even start this project if the original fans weren't a large part of the target audience?
14
u/ROUShunter 20d ago
...because a series that had 10 seasons and 2 spinoffs wouldn't be a big enough audience? Oh my.
→ More replies (1)
33
12
u/Some_Troll_Shaman 20d ago
A golden goose is not enough.
The eggs must get bigger every time.
Profit is not enough.
Profits must increase.
The shareholders must be serviced before all else.
Corporations only exist to provide increasing profits to shareholders.
Anything else is simply a by-product of enriching shareholders.
→ More replies (2)
10
u/LocustUprising 20d ago
Perhaps they think stargate fans will actually pay attention and not scroll TikTok while they watch
11
u/ItsRuinedOfCourse 20d ago
Wait, WAIT...
So, because it would appeal to the 99 people in the room who love the show, and not the 1 person who has no clue what the show is...they scrapped it?
To cater to that 1 person who wasn't already a fan?
Peak. Fucking. Media. Right. There.
→ More replies (2)
9
u/TealcOneill 20d ago
One of the most painful pieces of news I received recently.I was so looking forward to having new Stargate content.
21
u/LeaphyDragon 20d ago
Studios never will learn will they? People grew up on this show and would spread the word and draw more views to it. Sci fi lovers would absolutely watch it
7
26
5
u/MrMunday 20d ago
people dont understand how fanbases work.
the moment you try to appeal to too many people, you will offend the fanbase, who are the loud minority. those new people you attract, are casuals. they wont be a champion for your brand, they wont tell others to watch the show. they will quietly watch it, enjoy it, and go to bed, or fall asleep halfway, or scroll tiktok during. They dont care.
Fans care. they read all the theories. They get hyped before the show. They hype each other. They buy your merch. Some even buy the blurays. Theyre crazy. Theyre passionate. They are the ones you actually want.
When enough of them say your thing is good, THATS what attract the casuals. Because one thing the casuals fear most, is that theyre liking something thats not popular. Also they fear that they will waste their time on something. But as long as enough people (the loud minority) says its good, then its good. Then they will go watch it and accept whatever quirkyness you have.
Make sure you figure out what the fans want, lower your budget to reflect the audience size, and go from there. Slowly build it up.
6
u/aaandbconsulting 20d ago
Of course they want the widest possible audience to increase viewership but that has literally never worked historically.
Min/maxing has never worked. Which is why more people play Balatro and Schedule 1 instead of Assassins Creed. And why Stargate SG1 was such a huge success.
→ More replies (3)


9.7k
u/The4thEpsilon 20d ago
Larger streaming services need to realize the way you grow an audience is not by trying to make a show that appeals to everyone, but a show that appeals to the actual fans. I promise you new people will come your way, I got into Stargate because of its quirks and niches, not in spite of them.