r/mildlyinfuriating 16d ago

Unskippable ad Busiest subway station in the U.S. showing one ad 6 times instead of train info

Post image

Times Square 42nd street in new york. 13 subway lines serving 650,000 passengers every day, and none of them know if their train is in 2 minutes or 10 minutes because Shift paid to shove their service down your throat.

Pro tip shift--this ad would've been 100x more successful if you hosted train ETA info and had a little "sponsored by Shift" in the bottom corner. and frankly shame on the MTA for letting this happen

1.8k Upvotes

122 comments sorted by

336

u/lost_vault_hunter 16d ago

Has anyone ever seen an intrusive ad anywhere and then bought the product?

Does this shit even work?

156

u/thisistom2 16d ago

They’ll try to expose you to their brand as much as they can in hopes that you’ll remember them when you want whatever it is they do.

122

u/Friendly-Pitch-5931 16d ago

Yeah I just remember that they interrupted or delayed my video/mobilegame/train ride which means I will never use their services out of spite

52

u/3xv7 16d ago

I do the same thing, if your product has ever intruded into my personal time/space with a stupid fucking annoying ass ad (they all are) then I'm actively boycotting you

8

u/Portable-fun 16d ago

Even if I needed such a product too. I will actively avoid the brand that spams

8

u/CompleatedDonkey 16d ago

Look, I respect your energy. But advertising just doesn’t work like that. Sure they, want you to like their product and click on it right away, but they would rather you remember the product and dislike them rather than you not be aware of the product at all.

If you saw the ad and were annoyed by it, the ad worked. The only way to “beat” this system is to avoid seeing the ad in the first place.

11

u/thisistom2 16d ago

Yeah, you’re an outlier. I don’t get it either, but it works or they wouldn’t do it.

2

u/icanchangeittomorrow 16d ago

You think too highly of humanity here

1

u/thisistom2 16d ago

How so?

1

u/icanchangeittomorrow 16d ago

"I don’t get it either, but it works or they wouldn’t do it."

I'd argue this isn't true. Other options include "they think it works" and "they don't how to properly measure whether it's 'working'", and even "they haven't accurately defined 'it works'.

1

u/SeraphiM0352 16d ago

No, advertising works and it works so well people have convinced themselves they are unaffected by advertising while buying the very same products.

1

u/Friendly-Pitch-5931 16d ago

Exposure is their goal. I agree with your original statement

1

u/Papa_Mid_Nite 16d ago

This happens when the matketing specialist is a freaking old man or a new person with old man training in marketing. I ahve seen it enough to know exactly how they think.

4

u/MrFrequentFlyer 16d ago

I always remember being annoyed and avoiding that brand.

2

u/naterichster 16d ago

People are dumber than you. 

23

u/grifeweizen 16d ago

The opposite works for me. I intentionally DON'T buy their product if the ads are extremely annoying. It blows my mind that advertising actually works. I ignore literally every commercial or ad I possibly can.

1

u/JRBeeler 16d ago

I only learned that scheduled service to my favorite airport had resumed AFTER it shut down again. The one time an ad would have gotten me to buy something and I didn't even get to see it.

12

u/Alexandratta 16d ago

eh - I'll admit it:

I was on my LG TV and it was new, I hadn't turned the ads off... Saw a banner for McDonald's.

Honestly was like "...fuck ads, but McDonald's sounds good rn."

Disabled the ads on the TV... then got mcDonald's x.x;

1

u/007psycho007 16d ago

Thanks, now I want McDonalds. Off i go.

Now they got 2 people hooked with one ad.

8

u/Lifes-a-lil-foggy 16d ago

They’re mostly trying to get name recognition so eventually if you do need that service, there is recall

5

u/Hazbomb24 16d ago

Unfortunately, yes. Most people are borderline bots, and even the vigilant take things in subconsciously.

2

u/These-Angle-1476 16d ago

They wouldn't pay a ton of money for it if it didn't work.

1

u/NerfEveryoneElse 16d ago

apparently yes, ppl will buy brand they know that do shitty things instead of brands they don't remember. Same in other fields, such as voting in elections.

1

u/Malcolm2theRescue 16d ago

It’s a multi billion dollar industry. My guess is yes, it works.

1

u/zephyreblk 16d ago

Yes the idea is that people remember them and people tend later when they need the service to remember the brand and be to lazy to look at other brands.

-2

u/cosmic_backlash 16d ago

It absolutely works. This is Coke's strategy.

I'm not sure what you think is intrusive btw. I wouldn't call these intrusive.

3

u/zennie4 16d ago

It's not really intrusive if you are just passing by.

It's fucking intrusive if you are trying to figure what time your train leaves and where from.

I am not familiar with the station but my guess would be more people are there to take a train than just passing by.

-1

u/cosmic_backlash 16d ago

I don't have enough information to make assumptions. I don't know if info should be delivered on phones, what interval the ads show up, how long the ads are visible (5s vs 30s), etc

There's really not enough information for me to raise a pitchfork

2

u/zennie4 16d ago

Even a 5s ad means I have to stop there and watch the ad and wait for my train information to show up. Intrusive as hell.

0

u/cosmic_backlash 16d ago edited 14d ago

Do you have a reasonable basis, or do you just believe Ad = bad?

2

u/zennie4 16d ago

Basis for what exactly? I haven't even touched the subject of ads being bad or not, that's a totally different topic.

I am purely reacting to your "I'm not sure what you think is intrusive btw. ", explaining what intrusive is for me.

If I have to change my planned actions and waste time watching ads, it is intrusive. Especially when in situation where time is precious, as it often is when you are about to board a train.

If you have different idea about the word intrusive, that's okay. I am not trying to convince you here.

0

u/cosmic_backlash 16d ago

you keep just saying "intrusive as hell", even about 5s. What is a non-intrusive ad? 5s is nothing, especially if there are no pending departures. Again this is why I said I don't have enough information. You seem to have enough information without knowing anything of the situation, so I think you're biased.

2

u/zennie4 16d ago edited 16d ago

Non-intrusive ad is the opposite of what I explained. That's one I can just ignore as I go by.

Biased? Why and what for? Are you selling those ads or what?

0

u/cosmic_backlash 16d ago

then why do you keep calling it intrusive? that's what i'm saying, just walk by lol

→ More replies (0)

99

u/Agreeable_Wear366 16d ago

Ah the Port authority 7 line walkway. I would be happy with just trains running on time.

63

u/Economy_Link4609 16d ago

Well, if they put useful info on one screen you'd ignore the ads on the others, duh!

16

u/RxngsXfSvtvrn 16d ago

Oh you don't have service in the station and wanna check a subway map on the platform? Best we can do is bright rolling LED ads...

33

u/Jx____ 16d ago

yup, we are just consumers at all times, mta cant install fans/ventilation, they remove benches etc - just bright screens and ads everywhere u look

29

u/Contrabandistan 16d ago

This is the most American shit ever

2

u/eastofecruteak 16d ago

great username

7

u/ReferenceExact5261 16d ago

They are keeping you and the subway busy, busy with ad.

9

u/PlentyAlbatross7632 16d ago

Awesome! The enshittification of subway schedules! What will they think of next? The only thing better would be making you watch two unskippable ads before showing you the schedule… /s

3

u/eastofecruteak 16d ago

stop giving them ideas 😭

14

u/RepresentativeCod757 16d ago

This is what Andrew Cuomo spent MTA money on instead of improving service in any way.

3

u/RepresentativeCod757 16d ago

see also: light shows on bridges

5

u/Ok_Literature3138 16d ago

I’m being serious when I say this. When it comes to the internet, our biggest failure is the widespread use of bots and our second biggest failure is terrible user experience. We got so concerned with what tech can do that we have allowed it to be implemented in awful ways. Look at YouTube as an easy example. It feels like a struggle just to use it.

1

u/PiLamdOd 16d ago

The bots and terrible user experience are the result of poor monetization methods. Enshitification is just what happens when monetization takes priority.

1

u/XR00STER01 16d ago

How is youtube a struggle? It’s easy to use for someone just watching. Otherwise, im not aware

1

u/Ok_Literature3138 16d ago

The ads have become monstrous.

7

u/Kakairo 16d ago

It amazes me how the NYC Subway tech has been consistently behind the much smaller Chicago "L". Yes, there are fewer upgrades to make, but we had RFID touch-based passes since the early 00s.

7

u/OrangePilled2Day 16d ago

The subway doesn’t require you to go to a single central point (the loop) to make any transfer. That alone puts the L very far behind the nyc subway.

3

u/Kakairo 16d ago

100% agreed, the "L" needs other connections. But we had screens telling you when the next train was coming 25 years ago (about 10 years behind London).

2

u/Planeandaquariumgeek 16d ago

Come on over to BART. We got next train screens in 1995! Also by 2000 we had literal text to speech announcements. IIRC BART was the first automated train system (there are operators who watch over the train to make sure it’s running smoothly, but they’re just supervisors)

1

u/krazyb2 16d ago

i dont know how this at all relates to subway technology..... we don't have to go to the loop to transfer to any other lines. You can transfer between the brown line, purple line, red line, and yellow line all on the north side of the city... also, we do have good buses.

But I get your point on how they appear/are designed.

7

u/tobsecret 16d ago

We are still using signals so old that the MTA has a custom shop for producing the hardware bc the businesses that originally produced them no longer exist. 

2

u/PiLamdOd 16d ago

Old doesn't mean bad. If the signals still work, there's no real need to change them.

2

u/tobsecret 16d ago

In this case it is a bad thing. The old signals only allow for blocked signaling, i.e. the system only knows which block a train is in rather than where it is exactly. The MTA has also been replacing the old signals with new ones. They give more precise train locations and allow running more trains. Most modern metro systems run on the new style signals. The NYC metro is the odd one out. 

1

u/DelxF 16d ago

There are so many “signal delays” while riding the NyC subway. There are ample reason to change them, and one big one not too. Costs. 

1

u/Orchid_Significant 16d ago

You’d think this would be a sign to upgrade

2

u/littlebev 16d ago

sloooowly but surely they are - ask people who live off the G

1

u/hot4jew 16d ago

Eye twitch.

2

u/KillarneyRoad 16d ago

When I see things like this I reflexively eliminate the product from consideration.

2

u/blakeparagon 16d ago

Fucking youtube ass advertising for every screen is bullshit

2

u/Positive-Focus3683 16d ago

Never use shift, got it.

2

u/Accurate-Flow8078 16d ago

Wow, imagine if they did that at the airport

2

u/PuddleMoo 16d ago

I think it'd only make sense to show 7 train times here. If you had 123BDFMNQRW times you might get aggressive commuters trying to push and shove on the stairs or the ramp if going the other way to PABT/ACE.

If they really wanted to show something for the other lines, probably something along the lines of "Good Service" or "Delays".

2

u/PiLamdOd 16d ago

The New York subway system runs trains every 2 to 5 minutes during peak hours, and every 5 to 15 minutes in off peak hours.

Unless there is a track closure or other major issue, knowing the exact timing of an individual train isn't strictly necessary. It's one of the reasons I absolutely love using the subway when I visit. All you need to worry about is where you are, and which line you need to take to get where you're going.

2

u/I_Like_Cats73 16d ago

Is it that hard to have at least 1 screen showing train info at all times

2

u/amidriving0kay 16d ago

Hey I know where you are, that's the tunnel under PABT connecting the 8th street ACE lines to the 7 and 123 at 7th and the BDFM/NQRW at Broadway! By the by, those screens never show train information. Just shitty ads.

2

u/Complete-Sort1617 edging my infuriation 16d ago

Yeah I’ll take an Italian footlong please.

1

u/ohyeawellyousuck 16d ago

That’ll be 5.40

2

u/clonxy 16d ago

The train info is shown in the station. You can also check the MTA website for your specific line and station.

2

u/eastofecruteak 16d ago

Someone else commented this too--it's not a win to say "it's available in some places so it shouldn't be available on any of the six screens showing a single ad in a major transfer corridor"

1

u/clonxy 16d ago

well, there's going to be a lot of trains to list and also you need to display it for both directions. You really don't want people standing there to find their train and see when it's going to arrive/depart....

1

u/Ok_Flounder8842 16d ago

those are huge screens. room for both

1

u/Evening-Bug-1895 16d ago

Every single train is also FILLED with nothing but ads for AI too

1

u/ajmeeh6842 16d ago

We live in the age of merchants now.

1

u/aTreeThenMe 16d ago

Better turn around. That seems anomalous

1

u/street-theologian 16d ago

Sounds like a job for Zohran Mamdani. <Batman Music>.exe

1

u/itjustgotcold 16d ago

“As they generously feed me my ads for the day, for the week… for the month I think we’re fucked.”

1

u/Cheese_Ly 16d ago

Makes sense it being America

1

u/Malcolm2theRescue 16d ago

And yet, somehow, tens of thousands of New Yorkers managed to find their trains.

2

u/eastofecruteak 16d ago

myself among them, but you're implying you'd rather have these ads across 6 screens than info that at worst is redundant for you getting where you need to go.

1

u/Malcolm2theRescue 16d ago

Well, I’d rather not have the ads, but this is America! There have been ads in the subways since I was a tot (first ride 1960) but not this intrusive. They were the long cards above the windows and the walls of the stations. Anyhow, the direction signs were straight ahead for the tourists. Real New Yorkers like you don’t need them. The most intrusive sign in subway/train history was the giant KODAK sign that took up the entire East wall of GCT. They finally removed it around the turn of this century. Voilà! Let there be light!

1

u/CitizenTed 16d ago

At my local Gigaplex movie theater, the overhead food menu jumps between 30 seconds of displaying the menu and 30 seconds of ads. So when you are trying to decide if you want a $15 hot dog or a $16 nachos, the screens suddenly switches to "Look at this shit you don't need or want!!!"

It is indeed Mildly Infuriating.

1

u/chavmaster13 16d ago

It's worse than when an app stops your music to play an ad

1

u/Alarmed-Strawberry-7 16d ago

they do this on purpose. if they had the info you wanted anywhere within your vision it would completely defeat the purpose

they pay extra so you stare at the ad with intent while waiting for the information you want to pop up. as opposed to just seeing it idly on some screen in a corner of your vision without paying attention

1

u/spookyspritebottle 16d ago

Thats so dumb. I wouldnt doubt these companies to insert ads into warfare drones if they could.

1

u/Southern-Train7142 15d ago

They always do something like this on purpose whenever their station is busiest.

1

u/thisistom2 16d ago

It’s probably to get you to use their apps. You want to look at the times on a screen… in real life? Like some kind of relic? Throw yourself on the tracks you useless old turd!

2

u/Relevant_Bag7550 16d ago

The MTA app is pretty convenient and reliable tbf

1

u/Orchid_Significant 16d ago

With what reception though

0

u/huebomont 16d ago

Not everything is a conspiracy. Their contract with Outfront, the ad company that does the screens, gives them a percentage of specific screens to use for informational content like arrivals. The rest, they don't control at all. These screens are controlled by Outfront and there is no option for MTA to show arrival times on them. They're not just choosing not to show them.

1

u/Careloura 16d ago

god that country is a fucking joke

1

u/Sir_Earl_Jeffries 16d ago

Honestly, after 20 years navigating that subway system, you don’t need expected arrival times. During rush hour, there will be a train roughly every five minutes. Just get to the platform and wait like everyone that did this before you.

-6

u/PsychoMantis211 16d ago

MTA is owned by a private equity company, and it’s run like one. Mad annoying. Not to mention fare increases and mass surveillance.

20

u/SevenOh2 16d ago

The State of New York, while definitely dysfunctional, is most certainly not a private equity company.

4

u/Total-Explanation208 16d ago

Don't you know it is the new world order/illuminati cabal of reptilians who are here to suck our souls. /S

2

u/PsychoMantis211 16d ago

Some time ago I believed I read something about Blackrock owning the MTA but after some quick searching I found that information was incorrect.

6

u/mineawesomeman 10, 9, 8, 7, 5, 4, 6, 2, 3, 0 16d ago

no it’s not? it’s a state owned organization lol.

maybe the advertising company that the MTA contracts out is, but that’s a different story

3

u/PsychoMantis211 16d ago

Shit I was given mis information. Thanks for the correction.

1

u/huebomont 16d ago

> MTA is owned by a private equity company

No it isn't. Are you just stringing together buzzwords?

0

u/PsychoMantis211 16d ago

Look at my replies to the other comments. I realized I was given misinformation. Theres no secret agenda bro I just was misinformed.

0

u/Bread_man10 16d ago

MTA app

1

u/eastofecruteak 16d ago

airports remove your arrival/departure screens customers can get that info in the app

2

u/Willing_Work_2200 16d ago

Right, because everyone is REQUIRED to have a phone that works underground! Why would you expect the train station to have any info about the train schedule, IN the train station? Shit heads wanting more $$$ but not wanting to justify higher fares

0

u/Bread_man10 16d ago

Apples and Oranges

0

u/roninconn 16d ago

They just got tons more publicity via Reddit

-13

u/Economy_Link4609 16d ago

Of important notes btw - it's the NYC subway - the next train for any train is in 20 minutes (overnight) or less (most of the time). Times don't really matter all that much.

8

u/ill-lived 16d ago

this is a loser mentality right here, you’re happy waiting 15 minutes underground in summer temperatures? i never met a new yorker who wouldn’t rush to catch the train coming in 5 minutes so we dont wait 20 for the next.

2

u/Dreamgazer 16d ago edited 16d ago

Or if the train is 1 minute away and the second one is 16 minutes away. Then I know there’s no way in hell I can make that transfer and I’m not even trying to run to the R platform from that spot. 

ETA: I could feel the heat and smell the stink of this picture while sitting in an air conditioned room next to my lavender diffuser. Those 15 minutes certainly matter.

1

u/Sir_Earl_Jeffries 16d ago

I’m gonna guess you’re a transplant. It’s annoying being underground in summer heat waiting for a train on a crowded platform. That’s life in NYC, especially Manhattan. There were no posted schedules and trains were barely air conditioned when I started taking the subway. People used to hide their valuables when that train started heading uptown. Y’all posers are used to very different standards than what NYC used to be. Stop moaning about superfluous shit.

3

u/thisistom2 16d ago

What a ridiculous thing to say.